link.springer.com

Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty? - Memory & Cognition

  • ️Phelps, F. G.
  • ️Wed Jun 01 2005

References

  • Abel, M. (1990). Experiences in an exploratory distributed organization. In J. Gallagher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.),Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 489–510). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramovitch, R., &Daly, E. M. (1978). Children’s use of head orientation and eye contact in making attributions of affiliation.Child Development,49, 519–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. H., O’Malley, C., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Langton, S., Newlands, A., Mullin, J., Fleming, A. M., &Van der Velden, J. (1997). The impact of VMC on collaborative problem solving: An analysis of task performance, communicative process, and user satisfaction. In K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, & S. B. Wilbur (Eds.),Videomediated communication (pp. 133–156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1996).Bodily communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M., &Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation.Sociometry,6, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, G. W. (1981). A further investigation of the cognitive interference hypothesis of gaze patterns during conversation.British Journal of Social Psychology,20, 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V. (1995). The role of the face in face-to-face video communication. In S. J. Emmott (Ed.),Information superhighways: Multimedia users and futures (pp. 227–238). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Manusov, V., Mineo, P., &Hale, J. L. (1985). Effects of gaze on hiring, credibility, attraction and relational message interpretation.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,9, 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., &Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.),Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (1999). The impact of television on the presentation and reception of children’s testimony.International Journal of Law & Psychiatry,22, 241–256.Davies, G., & Noon, E. (1991).An evaluation of the live link for child witnesses [Home Office report]. London.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A. H., O’Malley, C., Langton, S., Garrod, S., &Bruce, V. (1997). Face-to-face and video mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,3, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bonner, L., &Bruce, V. (2001). Cognitive demands of face monitoring: Evidence for visuospatial overload.Memory & Cognition,29, 909–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bruce, V., Bonner, L., Longbotham, S., &Doyle, C. (2002). Development of gaze aversion as disengagement from visual information.Developmental Psychology,38, 438–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty-Sneddon, G., &Kent, G. (1996). Visual signals and the communication abilities of children.Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry,37, 949–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty-Sneddon, G., &McAuley, S. (2000). Influence of video mediation on adult-child interviews: Implications for the use of the live link with child witnesses.Applied Cognitive Psychology,14, 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F. (2005).Teachers’ responses to children’s gaze aversion during classroom interactions. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Ellyson, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., &Corson, R. L. (1981). Visual behavior differences in females as a function of self-perceived expertise.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,5, 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R., Gray, D., &Schuette, D. (1965). Visual behavior in a dyad as affected by interview content and sex of respondent.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,1, 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L., &Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering.Memory & Cognition,26, 651–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Wein, D., &Chang, C. (1992). Assessing knowledge through gesture: Using children’s hands to read their minds.Cognition & Instruction,9, 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Tobey, A. E., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., Orcutt, H., Thomas, S., Shapiro, C., &Sachsenmaier, T. (1998). Face-to-face confrontation: Effects of closed-circuit technology on children’s eyewitness testimony and jurors’ decisions.Law & Human Behavior,22, 165–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, A. G. (1985). Differences between blacks and whites in nonverbal communication. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 229–259). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, J. L. (1984). Black/white non-verbal differences, dance and dissonance. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.),Nonverbal behavior: Perspectives, applications, intercultural insights (pp. 373–409). Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction.Acta Psychologica,26, 22–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, A. (2004, January).Are the eyes the windows to the soul? Talk given at University of Kyoto, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review,92, 350–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, F., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Warnock, H. (in press). Functional benefits of children’s gaze aversion during questioning.British Journal of Developmental Psychology.

  • Russell C., &Lavie, N. (2001). Changing faces: A detection advantage in the flicker paradigm.Psychological Science,12, 94–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., O’Shea, T., O’Malley, C., Scanlon, E., &Taylor, J. (1991). Preliminary experiments with a distributed, multi-media, problem-solving environment. In J. Bowers & S. Benford (Eds.),Studies in computer-supported co-operative work: Theory, practice and design (pp. 31–48). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, G., &Martin, D. S. (1968). Eye-contact and the recall of material involving competitive and noncompetitive associations.Psychonomic Science,13, 337–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (2002). Deception in children: A literature review and implications for children’s testimony. In H. L. Westcott, G. M. Davies, & R. H. C. Bull (Eds.),Children’s testimony (pp. 175–194). London: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, O. M. (1970).Proxemic behaviour: A cross-cultural study. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., &Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references