path space object in nLab
Context
Homotopy theory
homotopy theory, (∞,1)-category theory, homotopy type theory
flavors: stable, equivariant, rational, p-adic, proper, geometric, cohesive, directed…
models: topological, simplicial, localic, …
see also algebraic topology
Introductions
Definitions
Paths and cylinders
Homotopy groups
Basic facts
Theorems
Model category theory
model category, model ∞ \infty -category
Definitions
Morphisms
Universal constructions
Refinements
Producing new model structures
Presentation of (∞,1)(\infty,1)-categories
Model structures
for ∞\infty-groupoids
-
on chain complexes/model structure on cosimplicial abelian groups
related by the Dold-Kan correspondence
for equivariant ∞\infty-groupoids
for rational ∞\infty-groupoids
for rational equivariant ∞\infty-groupoids
for nn-groupoids
for ∞\infty-groups
for ∞\infty-algebras
general ∞\infty-algebras
specific ∞\infty-algebras
for stable/spectrum objects
for (∞,1)(\infty,1)-categories
for stable (∞,1)(\infty,1)-categories
for (∞,1)(\infty,1)-operads
for (n,r)(n,r)-categories
for (∞,1)(\infty,1)-sheaves / ∞\infty-stacks
Contents
Idea
A path space object in homotopy theory is an object in a homotopical category that behaves for many purposes as the topological path space does in topological homotopy theory.
Definition
Definition
(path space object)
For 𝒞\mathcal{C} a category with weak equivalences and with binary products, a path space object of/for an object XX of 𝒞\mathcal{C} is a factorization of the diagonal morphism X→(Id,Id)X×XX \stackrel{(Id, Id)}{\to} X \times X into the product as
X→sPaths X→(d 0,d 1)X×X X \xrightarrow{\;\;\; s \;\;\;} Paths_X \xrightarrow{\;\;\; (d_0, d_1) \;\;\;} X \times X
such that ss is a weak equivalence (Quillen 1967, §I.1).
Moreover (Dwyer & Spalinski 1995, §4.12):
If 𝒞\mathcal{C} in addition has the structure of a fibration category then one speaks, furthermore, of a good path space object if (d 0,d 1)(d_0,d_1) is a fibration.
If 𝒞\mathcal{C} furthermore has the structure of a model category then one speaks of a very good path space object if (d 0,d 1)(d_0,d_1) is a fibration and ss is a cofibration (hence an acyclic cofibration).
Examples
In model categories
If CC is a model category then the factorization axiom ensures that for every object X∈CX \in C there is a factorization of the diagonal
X→≃X I→(d 0,d 1)X×X X \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} X^I \stackrel{(d_0, d_1)}{\to} X \times X
with the additional property that X I→X×XX^I \to X \times X is a fibration.
If XX itself is fibrant, then the projections X×X→XX \times X \to X are fibrations and moreover by 2-out-of-3 applied to the diagram
X I s↗ ↘ d i X →Id X \array{ && X^I \\ & {}^{\mathllap{s}}\nearrow && \searrow^{\mathrlap{d_i}} \\ X &&\stackrel{Id}{\to}&& X }
are themselves weak equivalences X I→≃XX^I \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} X. This is a key property that implies the factorization lemma.
If moreover the small object argument applies in the model category CC, then such factorizations, and hence path objects, may be chosen functorially: such that for each morphism X→YX \to Y the factorizations fit into a commuting diagram
X →≃ X I → X×X ↓ ↓ ↓ Y →≃ Y I → Y×Y \array{ X &\stackrel{\simeq}{\to} &X^I &\to & X \times X \\ \downarrow && \downarrow && \downarrow \\ Y & \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} & Y^I &\to & Y \times Y }
In simplicial model categories
If CC is a simplicial model category, then the powering over sSet can be used to explicitly construct functorial path objects for fibrant objects XX: define X→X I→X×XX \to X^I \to X \times X to be the powering of XX by the morphisms
Δ[0]∐Δ[0]↪d 0,d 1Δ[1]→≃Δ[0] \Delta[0] \coprod \Delta[0] \stackrel{d_0, d_1}{\hookrightarrow} \Delta[1] \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} \Delta[0]
in sSet QuillensSet_{Quillen}. Notice that the first morphism is a cofibration and the second a weak equivalence in the standard model structure on simplicial sets and that all objects are cofibrant.
Since by the axioms of an enriched model category the powering functor
(−) (−):sSet op×C→C (-)^{(-)} : sSet^{op} \times C \to C
sends cofibrations and acyclic cofibrations in the first argument to fibrations and acyclic fibrations inif the second argument is fibrant, and since this implies by the factorization lemma that it then also preserves weak equivalences between cofibrant objects, it follows that X Δ[1]X^{\Delta[1]} is indeed a path object with the extra property that also the two morphisms X Δ[1]→XX^{\Delta[1]} \to X are acyclic fibrations.
Right homotopies
Path objects are used to define a notion of right homotopy between morphisms in a category. Thus they capture aspects of higher category theory in a 11-categorical context.
Loop space objects
From a path space object may be derived loop space objects.
References
The general definition in model categories is due to:
- Daniel Quillen, § I.1, Def. 4, p. 9 (15 of 165) in: Axiomatic homotopy theory in: Homotopical Algebra, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 43, Springer 1967 (doi:10.1007/BFb0097438)
The terminology of “good” and “very good” path space objects appears in:
-
William Dwyer, Jan Spalinski, §4.12 in: Homotopy theories and model categories (pdf)
in: I. M. James, Handbook of Algebraic Topology, North Holland 1995 (ISBN:9780080532981, doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-81779-2.X5000-7)
Lecture notes:
Last revised on December 31, 2023 at 03:30:57. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.