web.archive.org

gamma distribution: Definition and Much More from Answers.com

️Wed Jul 01 2015

Gamma

Probability density function
Cumulative distribution function
Parameters	$k > 0\,$ shape (real) $\theta > 0\,$ scale (real)
Support	$x \in [0; \infty)\!$
Probability density function (pdf)	$x^{k-1} \frac{\exp{\left(-x/\theta\right)}}{\Gamma(k)\,\theta^k}\,\!$
Cumulative distribution function (cdf)	$\frac{\gamma(k, x/\theta)}{\Gamma(k)}\,\!$
Mean	$k \theta\,\!$
Median	no simple closed form
Mode	Failed to parse (unknown function\text): (k-1) \theta\text{ for }k \geq 1\,\!
Variance	$k \theta^2\,\!$
Skewness	$\frac{2}{\sqrt{k}}\,\!$
Excess kurtosis	$\frac{6}{k}\,\!$
Entropy	$k + \ln\theta + \ln\Gamma(k) \!$ $+ (1-k)\psi(k) \!$
Moment-generating function (mgf)	Failed to parse (unknown function\text): (1 - \theta\,t)^{-k}\text{ for }t < 1/\theta\,\!
Characteristic function	$(1 - \theta\,i\,t)^{-k}\,\!$

In probability theory and statistics, the gamma distribution is a two-parameter family of continuous probability distributions. It has a scale parameter θ and a shape parameter k. If k is an integer then the distribution represents the sum of k exponentially distributed random variables, each of which has mean θ.

Characterization

That a random variable X is gamma-distributed with scale θ and shape k is denoted

$X \sim \Gamma(k, \theta) \,\,\mathrm{ or }\,\, X \sim \textrm{Gamma}(k, \theta).$

Probability density function

The probability density function of the gamma distribution can be expressed in terms of the gamma function:

$f(x;k,\theta) = x^{k-1} \frac{e^{-x/\theta}}{\theta^k \, \Gamma(k)} \ \mathrm{ for }\ x > 0\,\, \mathrm{ and }\,\, k, \theta > 0.$

(This parameterization is used in the infobox and the plots.)

Alternatively, the gamma distribution can be parameterized in terms of a shape parameter α = k and an inverse scale parameter β = 1 / θ, called a rate parameter:

$g(x;\alpha,\beta) = x^{\alpha-1} \frac{\beta^{\alpha} \, e^{-\beta\,x} }{\Gamma(\alpha)} \ \mathrm{for}\ x > 0 \,\!.$

If α is a positive integer, then Γ(α) = (α - 1)!

Both parameterizations are common because either can be more convenient depending on the situation.

Cumulative distribution function

The cumulative distribution function can be expressed in terms of the incomplete gamma function,

$F(x;k,\theta) = \int_0^x f(u;k,\theta)\,du =\frac{\gamma(k, x/\theta)}{\Gamma(k)} \,\!$

Properties

Summation

If X_i has a Γ(α_i, β) distribution for i = 1, 2, ..., N, then

$\sum_{i=1}^N X_i \sim \Gamma \left( \sum_{i=1}^N \alpha_i, \beta \right) \,\!$

provided all X_i are independent.

The gamma distribution exhibits infinite divisibility.

Scaling

For any t > 0 it holds that tX is distributed Γ(k, tθ), demonstrating that θ is a scale parameter.

Exponential family

The Gamma distribution is a two-parameter exponential family with natural parameters k - 1 and 1 / θ, and natural statistics X and ln(X).

Information entropy

The information entropy is given by

$\frac{-1}{\theta^k \Gamma(k)} \int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^{k-1}}{e^{x/\theta}} \left[ (k-1)\ln x - x/\theta - k \ln\theta - \ln\Gamma(k) \right] \,dx \!$

$= -\left[ (k-1) (\ln\theta + \psi(k)) - k - k \ln\theta - \ln\Gamma(k) \right] \!$

$= k + \ln\theta + \ln\Gamma(k) + (1-k)\psi(k) \!$

where ψ(k) is the digamma function.

Kullback-Leibler divergence

The directed Kullback-Leibler divergence between Γ(α₀, β₀) ('true' distribution) and Γ(α, β) ('approximating' distribution) is given by

$D_{\mathrm{KL}}(\alpha,\beta || \alpha_0, \beta_0) = \log\left(\frac{\Gamma({\alpha_0})\beta_0^{\alpha_0}}{\Gamma(\alpha)\beta^{\alpha_0}}\right)+(\alpha-{\alpha_0})\psi(\alpha)+\alpha\frac{\beta-\beta_0}{\beta_0}$

Laplace Transform

The Laplace transformation of the gamma distribution is

$F(s)=\frac{\beta^\alpha}{(s+\beta)^\alpha}$

Parameter estimation

Maximum likelihood estimation

The likelihood function for N iid observations (x₁,...,x_N) is

$L(\theta)=\prod_{i=1}^N f(x_i;k,\theta)\,\!$

from which we calculate the log-likelihood function

$\ell(\theta) = (k-1) \sum_{i=1}^N \ln{(x_i)} - \sum x_i/\theta - Nk\ln{(\theta)} - N\ln{\Gamma(k)}.$

Finding the maximum with respect to θ by taking the derivative and setting it equal to zero yields the maximum likelihood estimate of the θ parameter:

$\hat{\theta} = \frac{1}{kN}\sum_{i=1}^N x_i. \,\!$

Substituting this into the log-likelihood function gives

$\ell=(k-1)\sum_{i=1}^N\ln{(x_i)}-Nk-Nk\ln{\left(\frac{\sum x_i}{kN}\right)}-N\ln{(\Gamma(k))}. \,\!$

Finding the maximum with respect to k by taking the derivative and setting it equal to zero yields

$\ln{(k)}-\psi(k)=\ln{\left(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N x_i\right)}-\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N\ln{(x_i)} \,\!$

where

$\psi(k) = \frac{\Gamma'(k)}{\Gamma(k)} \!$

is the digamma function.

There is no closed-form solution for k. The function is numerically very well behaved, so if a numerical solution is desired, it can be found using, for example, Newton's method. An initial value of k can be found either using the method of moments, or using the approximation

$\ln(k)-\psi(k) \approx \frac{1}{k}\left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{12k+2}\right). \,\!$

If we let

$s = \ln{\left(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N x_i\right)} - \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N\ln{(x_i)},\,\!$

then k is approximately

$k \approx \frac{3-s+\sqrt{(s-3)^2 + 24s}}{12s}$

which is within 1.5% of the correct value.^{[citation needed]} An explicit form for the Newton-Raphson update of this initial guess is given by Choi and Wette (1969) as the following expression:

$k \leftarrow k - \frac{ \ln k - \psi\left(k\right) - s }{ 1/k - \psi'\left(k\right) }$

where $\psi'\left(\cdot\right)$ denotes the trigamma function (the derivative of the digamma function).

The digamma and trigamma functions can be difficult to calculate with high precision. However, approximations known to be good to several significant figures can be computed using the following approximation formulae:

$\psi\left(k\right) = \begin{cases} \ln(k) - ( 1 + ( 1 - ( 1/10 - 1 / ( 21 k^2 ) ) / k^2 ) / ( 6 k ) ) / ( 2 k ), \quad k \geq 8 \\ \psi\left( k + 1 \right) - 1/k, \quad k < 8 \end{cases}$

and

$\psi'\left(k\right) = \begin{cases} ( 1 + ( 1 + ( 1 - ( 1/5 - 1 / ( 7 k^2 ) ) / k^2 ) / ( 3 k ) ) / ( 2 k ) ) / k, \quad k \geq 8, \\ \psi'\left( k + 1 \right) + 1/k^2, \quad k < 8. \end{cases}$

For details, see Choi and Wette (1969).

Bayesian minimum mean-squared error

With known k and unknown θ, the posterior PDF for theta (using the standard scale-invariant prior for θ) is

$P(\theta | k, x_1, ..., x_N) \propto 1/\theta \prod_{i=1}^N f(x_i;k,\theta).\,\!$

Denoting

$y \equiv \sum_{i=1}^N x_i , \qquad P(\theta | k, x_1, \dots , x_N) = C(x_i) \theta^{-N k-1} e^{-y / \theta}. \!$

Integration over θ can be carried out using a change of variables, revealing that 1/θ is gamma-distributed with parameters Failed to parse (unknown function\scriptstyle): \scriptstyle \alpha = N k,\ \ \beta = y .

$\int_0^{\infty} \theta^{-N k-1+m} e^{-y / \theta}\, d\theta = \int_0^{\infty} x^{N k -1 -m} e^{-x y} \, dx = y^{-(N k -m)} \Gamma(N k -m). \!$

The moments can be computed by taking the ratio (m by m = 0)

$E(x^m) = \frac {\Gamma (N k -m)} {\Gamma(N k)} y^m, \!$

which shows that the mean +/- standard deviation estimate of the posterior distribution for theta is

$\frac {y} {N k -1}$ +/- $\frac {y^2} {(N k-1)^2 (N k-2)}.$

Generating gamma-distributed random variables

Given the scaling property above, it is enough to generate gamma variables with β = 1 as we can later convert to any value of β with simple division.

Using the fact that a Γ(1, 1) distribution is the same as an Exp(1) distribution, and noting the method of generating exponential variables, we conclude that if U is uniformly distributed on (0, 1], then −ln(U) is distributed Γ(1, 1). Now, using the "α-addition" property of gamma distribution, we expand this result:

$\sum_{k=1}^n {-\ln U_k} \sim \Gamma(n, 1),$

where U_k are all uniformly distributed on (0, 1] and independent.

All that is left now is to generate a variable distributed as Γ(δ, 1) for 0 < δ < 1 and apply the "α-addition" property once more. This is the most difficult part.

We provide an algorithm without proof. It is an instance of the acceptance-rejection method:

Let m be 1.
Generate V_{3m - 2}, V_{3m -
1} and V_3m — independent uniformly distributed on (0, 1] variables.
If $V_{3m - 2} \le v_0$ , where $v_0 = \frac e {e + \delta}$ , then go to step 4, else go to step 5.
Let $\xi_m = V_{3m - 1}^{1 / \delta}, \ \eta_m = V_{3m} \xi _m^ {\delta - 1}$ . Go to step 6.
Let $\xi_m = 1 - \ln {V_{3m - 1}}, \ \eta_m = V_{3m} e^{-\xi_m}$ .
If $\eta_m > \xi_m^{\delta - 1} e^{-\xi_m}$ , then increment m and go to step 2.
Assume ξ = ξ_m to be the realization of Γ(δ,1)

Now, to summarize,

$\theta \left( \xi - \sum _{i=1} ^{[k]} {\ln U_i} \right) \sim \Gamma (k, \theta),$

where [k] is the integral part of k, and ξ has been generated using the algorithm above with δ = {k} (the fractional part of k), U_k and V_l are distributed as explained above and are all independent.

The GNU Scientific Library (which has ports for Visual Studio) has robust routines for sampling many distributions including the Gamma distribution.

Related distributions

Specializations

Others

If X has a Γ(k, θ) distribution, then 1/X has an inverse-gamma distribution with parameters k and θ^-1.
If X and Y are independently distributed Γ(α, θ) and Γ(β, θ) respectively, then X / (X + Y) has a beta distribution with parameters α and β.
If X_i are independently distributed Γ(α_i,θ) respectively, then the vector (X₁ / S, ..., X_n / S), where S = X₁ + ... + X_n, follows a Dirichlet distribution with parameters α₁, ..., α_n.

References

R. V. Hogg and A. T. Craig. Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 4th edition. New York: Macmillan, 1978. (See Section 3.3.)
Eric W. Weisstein, Gamma distribution at MathWorld.
Engineering Statistics Handbook
S. C. Choi and R. Wette. (1969) Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Parameters of the Gamma Distribution and Their Bias, Technometrics, 11(4) 683-69

	Probability distributions []
Univariate	Multivariate
Discrete:	Benford • Bernoulli • binomial • Boltzmann • categorical • compound Poisson • discrete phase-type • degenerate • Gauss-Kuzmin • geometric • hypergeometric • logarithmic • negative binomial • parabolic fractal • Poisson • Rademacher • Skellam • uniform • Yule-Simon • zeta • Zipf • Zipf-Mandelbrot	Ewens • multinomial • multivariate Polya
Continuous:	Beta • Beta prime • Cauchy • chi-square • Dirac delta function • Coxian • Erlang • exponential • exponential power • F • fading • Fermi-Dirac • Fisher's z • Fisher-Tippett • Gamma • generalized extreme value • generalized hyperbolic • generalized inverse Gaussian • Half-logistic • Hotelling's T-square • hyperbolic secant • hyper-exponential • hypoexponential • inverse chi-square (scaled inverse chi-square) • inverse Gaussian • inverse gamma (scaled inverse gamma) • Kumaraswamy • Landau • Laplace • Lévy • Lévy skew alpha-stable • logistic • log-normal • Maxwell-Boltzmann • Maxwell speed • Nakagami • normal (Gaussian) • normal-gamma • normal inverse Gaussian • Pareto • Pearson • phase-type • polar • raised cosine • Rayleigh • relativistic Breit-Wigner • Rice • shifted Gompertz • Student's t • triangular • truncated normal • type-1 Gumbel • type-2 Gumbel • uniform • Variance-Gamma • Voigt • von Mises • Weibull • Wigner semicircle • Wilks' lambda	Dirichlet • Generalized Dirichlet distribution . inverse-Wishart • Kent • matrix normal • multivariate normal • multivariate Student • von Mises-Fisher • Wigner quasi • Wishart
Miscellaneous:	bimodal • Cantor • conditional • equilibrium • exponential family • Infinite divisibility (probability) • location-scale family • marginal • maximum entropy • posterior • prior • quasi • sampling • singular