emedicine.medscape.com

Infective Endocarditis: Practice Essentials, Background, Pathophysiology

  • ️Invalid Date

Practice Essentials

Previous updates of this article have focused on the contribution of the following to infective endocarditis (IE):

  1. Antibiotic resistance
  2. The increasing implantation of intravascular devices
  3. COVID-19
  4. Opiate use disorders
  5. The growing number of immunosuppressed patients

The current article also focuses on the key role that the microbiome plays in producing many complications of IE including the growing rate of resistance to antimicrobial agents and the "weaponizing" of probiotics and postbiotics against the patient and the ability of infecting microbes to trigger sterile inflammatory responses that mimic the initial valvular infection.

The microbiome is the general term that describes the trillions of various bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses that live on and within our bodies. The chief microbiomes are that of the gut, mouth, and skin. The microbiomes of the mouth and gut normally have a flora that promotes the overall health of the surrounding tissue. The most significant of these is that of the gut because it facilitates the absorption of all types of materials that are necessary for health of the host. What is quite challenging is to determine a case of IE that may or may not have any connection to a pathogenic microbiome. 

Infective endocarditis (IE) is the term that denotes a bacterial , viral or fungal infection of the endocardial surfaces of the heart—usually those of 1 or more cardiac valves; to a lesser degree the mural endocardium; or a septal defect. Such may produce severe valvular insufficiency, intractable congestive heart failure, myocardial abscesses, infected and sterile emboli, and a variety of immunological processes. Since approximately 2008, its incidence, morbidity, and mortality have risen dramatically. [1, 2, 3]

Simultaneously, there has been an ever-growing marked increase in resistance to many types of established antimicrobial therapies. There also is the challenge of dealing with "new" pathogens that originate from outside the United States or that are due to the increase in immunosuppressed individuals. The waves of COVID have increased all types of intravascular infection by increasing the necessity of intravascular lines. 

In response to these realities, the International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVD) has established a multidisciplinary working group to update the Duke Criteria 1994 [4]  and its modification of 2000 [5]  to meet these current challenges. The 2023 Duke Criteria [6]  for diagnosing IE consider the newly available microbiological techniques such as enzyme immunoassays, metagenomic sequencing, and in situations of hybridization, imaging techniques such as metagenomic imaging.

Recently available diagnostic tests, such as enzyme amino assays for Bartonella, PCR, and newer types of imaging, especially [18F]FDG PET/Cardiac Computed Tomography. The finding of valvular infection on direct examination during surgery has become a major criterion. Tables of organisms that are typical of intracardiac infections have been established. The diagnostic significance of IE, that of producing a continuous bacteremia, appears to be minimized in this document. Specific guidelines for the proper drawing of blood cultures have been eliminated; it was proposed that these criteria should be updated on a regular basis to make it a "Living Document." [6]

Signs and Symptoms

IE has been classified into subacute and acute categories based on the rate of progression of the process prior to diagnosis. Individuals with untreated SBE can survive up to 1 year, whereas someone with acute infection that is untreated will barely survive 6-8 weeks. [7, 8]

Subacute infective endocarditis (SBE) 

Fever, often low-grade and intermittent, is present in up to 90% of cases of SBE. Heart murmurs are documented in approximately 85% of patients.

50% of patients may exhibit 1 or more classic signs and symptoms of SBE. These are immunologic and are underappreciated because of their subtle nature. Signs and symptoms of SBE include the following:

  • Petechiae 

  • Subungual (splinter) hemorrhages: Dark red, linear lesions in the nail beds

  • Osler nodes: Tender subcutaneous nodules usually found on the distal pads of the digits

  • Janeway lesions: Nontender maculae on the palms and soles

  • Roth spots: Retinal hemorrhages with small, clear centers (rare)

Signs of neurologic disease include the following [2, 3, 6, 9, 10] :

  • Embolic stroke with focal neurologic deficits (the most common neurologic sign)

  • Intracerebral hemorrhage

  • Multiple microabscesses

Other signs of IE include the following:

  • Splenomegaly

  • Stiff neck

  • Delirium

  • Paralysis, hemiparesis, aphasia

  • Conjunctival hemorrhage

  • Pallor

  • Gallops

  • Rales

  • Cardiac arrhythmia

  • Pericardial rub

  • Pleural friction rub

  • Low-grade fever (absent in 3-15% of patients)

  • Anorexia

  • Weight loss

  • Influenza-like syndromes

  • Polymyalgia-like syndromes

  • Pleuritic pain

  • Syndromes similar to rheumatic fever, such as fever, dulled sensorium (as in typhoid), headaches

  • Abdominal symptoms, such as right upper quadrant pain, vomiting, postprandial distress, appendicitis-like symptoms

Acute bacterial endocarditis 

Cases of acute bacterial endocarditis (ABE) present with far more aggressive symptoms, including the following:

  • Sepsis

  • Congestive heart failure

  • Renal failure

  • Stroke

  • Septic emboli

Effect of COVID 19 infection in diagnosing IE

Many of the symptoms of COVID -19 and IE overlap. Indeed, both infections can be concurrent. The inflammatory response to COVID -19 may mimic persistence of IE. [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]

Diagnosis

The Duke diagnostic criteria were developed by Durack and colleagues as a guide for reaching a valid definitive diagnosis of IE. The criteria combine the clinical, microbiologic, pathologic, and echocardiographic characteristics of a specific case. [2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10]

Major blood culture criteria for IE include the following:

  • Two blood cultures positive for organisms typically found in patients with IE

  • Blood cultures persistently positive for 1 of these organisms, from cultures drawn more than 12 hours apart

  • Three or more separate blood cultures drawn at least 1 hour apart

Major echocardiographic criteria include the following:

  • Echocardiogram positive for IE, documented by an oscillating intracardiac mass on a valve or on supporting structures, in the path of regurgitant jets, or on implanted material, in the absence of an alternative anatomic explanation

  • Myocardial abscess

  • Development of partial dehiscence of a prosthetic valve

  • New-onset valvular regurgitation

Minor criteria for IE include the following:

  • Predisposing heart condition or intravenous drug use (IVDA)

  • Fever of 38°C (100.4°F) or higher

  • Vascular phenomena, including major arterial emboli, septic pulmonary infarcts, mycotic aneurysm, intracranial hemorrhage, conjunctival hemorrhage, or Janeway lesions

  • Immunologic phenomena such as glomerulonephritis, Osler nodes, Roth spots, or rheumatoid factor

  • Positive blood culture results not meeting major criteria or serologic evidence of active infection with an organism consistent with IE

  • Echocardiogram results consistent with IE but not meeting major echocardiographic criteria

A definitive clinical diagnosis can be made based on the following:

  • Two major criteria

  • One major criterion and 3 minor criteria

  • Five minor criteria

The development of syndromic analysis (SA) better meets the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of the current profile of IE. Syndromic analysis considers the patient's current and past history, the tempo of the disease's progression, recognition of pertinent findings on physical exam, and nonspecific laboratory testing. The resulting case profile leads to the selection studies that will most quickly produce a definitive diagnosis. [7]

Management

There is an ever-growing urgency to diagnose IE and its complications, and to institute the most appropriate antibiotic treatment. The increasing resistance to the "tried and true" empiric regimens is becoming untenable because of the wide development of resistance to multiple classes of agents. This is especially true among those with opioid use disorder (OUD ) and other marginalized groups due to a decreased ability to access healthcare brought about by the multiple effects of COVID-19 on the healthcare system. [8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]

Please see COVID-19's Effect on Infective Endocarditis in People Who Inject Drugs and COVID-19 Reinfections.

Syndromic diagnostic techniques along with updated techniques of rapidly evaluating positive blood cultures show great promise. [7]  This is especially so regarding the time required to achieve the final identification and sensitivity of the infecting organism through the standard techniques. Various molecular diagnostics have lessened the turnaround times from greater than hours to 0.75–2.5 hours. Such techniques have become available since approximately 2020. The next best resource is an updated sensitivity pattern of community pathogens. The treatment of a given patient should reflect a collaboration of the microbiology laboratory, treating clinicians, and antimicrobial stewardship teams. [17, 18, 19]

eMedicine Logo

Background

IE is defined as an infection of the endocardial surface of the heart, which may include 1 or more heart valves, the mural endocardium, or a septal defect. The history of IE can be divided into several eras. In 1674, Lazaire Riviere first described the gross autopsy findings of the disease in his monumental work Opera Medica Universa. In 1885, William Osler presented the first comprehensive description of endocarditis in English. Lerner and Weinstein presented a thorough discussion of this disease in their landmark series of articles, “Infective Endocarditis in the Antibiotic Era.” [20, 21, 22]  These authors documented that IE was most commonly subacute in nature with streptococci and enterococci as the most common pathogens. Rheumatic fever or congenital heart disease were the most frequent underlying valvular abnormalities. Accordingly, it manifested itself in young adulthood. 

In the late 1980s, the nature of IE fundamentally changed. This was brought about by the ever-increasing availability of prosthetic heart valves, intracardiac pacemakers, and Swan-Ganz catheters. It became much more acute in nature and affected older individuals with a wider spectrum of pathogens. These included especially S aureus, both MSSA and MRSA, gram negative rods, and fungi. IE can appropriately be described as infective endocarditis in the era of intravascular devices that is intensified by changes in the gut and oral microbiome and by the widespread inflammatory response initiated by many of the valvular pathogens. IE continues to pose significant clinical challenges, [3, 23, 24]  with an overall mortality rate of 30%. 

SBE results from "wear and tear" platelet/fibrin microthrombi of the endothelial surface of the heart. [24]  IE develops when a transient bacteremia seeds this thrombus. Pathologic effects of infection can include local tissue destruction and embolic phenomena. Secondary autoimmune effects, such as immune complex glomerulonephritis and vasculitis, can also occur. 

Types of infective endocarditis

Endocarditis has evolved into several variations, keeping it near the top of the list of diseases that must not be misdiagnosed or overlooked. Endocarditis can be broken down into the following categories [2, 3, 24] :

  • Native valve endocarditis (NVE), acute and subacute 

  • Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), [2, 3]  early and late

  • Intravenous drug abuse (IVDA) endocarditis

Other terms commonly used to classify types of IE include pacemaker IE and nosocomial IE (NIE).

The classic clinical presentation and clinical course of IE has been characterized as either acute or subacute. Indiscriminate antibiotic usage and an increase in immunosuppressed patients have blurred the distinction between these 2 major types; however, the classification still has clinical merit.

Acute NVE frequently involves normal valves and usually has an aggressive course. It is a rapidly progressive illness in healthy and debilitated persons alike. Virulent organisms, such as S aureus and group B streptococci, typically are the causative agents of this type of endocarditis. Underlying structural valve disease may be absent.

Subacute NVE primarily affects abnormal valves. Its course, even in untreated patients, usually is more indolent than that of the acute form and may extend over many months. Alpha-hemolytic streptococci or enterococci, usually in the setting of underlying structural valve disease, typically are the causative agents for this type of endocarditis.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis accounts for 10-20% of IE cases. Eventually, 5% of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves become infected. Mechanical valves are more likely to be infected within the first 3 months of implantation, and, after 1 year, bioprosthetic valves are more likely to be infected. The valves in the mitral valve position are more susceptible than those in the aortic areas. [2, 3, 25]

Early PVE occurs within 60 days of valve implantation. Traditionally, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), gram-negative bacilli, and Candida species have been the common infecting organisms. Late PVE occurs 60 days or more after valve implantation. Staphylococci, alpha-hemolytic streptococci, and enterococci are the common causative organisms. Data suggest that S aureus now may be the most common infecting organism in both early and late PVE.

In 75% of cases of IVDA IE, no underlying valvular abnormalities are noted, and 50% of these infections involve the tricuspid valve. [25]  Staphylococcus aureus is the most common causative organism. Hospitalizations and associated valvular surgeries increased 12-fold between 2007 and 2017. [2, 3, 26] With newer methodology, many carriers of S aureus have this pathogen widely distributed throughout their epidemic. [10]

Analogous to PVE are infections of implantable pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators. Usually, these devices are infected within a few months of implantation. Pacemaker infections include those of the generator pocket (the most common), the proximal leads, and the portions of the leads in direct contact with the endocardium. [10]

This last category represents true pacemaker IE, is the least common infectious complication of pacemakers (0.5% of implanted pacemakers) and is the most challenging to treat. Of pacemaker infections, 75% are produced by staphylococci, both coagulase-negative and coagulase-positive.

Healthcare associated IE is defined as an infection that manifests 48 hours after hospitalization or that is associated with a hospital, based on a procedure performed within 4 weeks of the clinical disease onset of disease. 

Two types of HCIE have been described. The right-sided variety affects a valve that has been injured by placement of an intravascular line (eg, Swan-Ganz catheter). Subsequently, the valve is infected by a nosocomial bacteremia. The second type develops in a previously damaged valve and is more likely to occur on the left side. Staphylococcus aureus has been the predominant pathogen of HCIE since the prevalence of intravascular devices. Enterococci are the second most isolated pathogens and usually arise from a genitourinary source.

The underlying valvular pathology has also changed. Rheumatic heart disease accounts for less than 20% of cases, and 6% of patients with rheumatic heart disease eventually develop IE. Approximately 50% of elderly patients have calcific aortic stenosis as the underlying pathology. Congenital heart disease accounts for 15% of cases, with the bicuspid aortic valve being the most common example. [27]

Other contributing congenital abnormalities include ventricular septal defectspatent ductus arteriosus, and tetralogy of FallotAtrial septal defect (secundum variety) rarely is associated with IE. Mitral valve prolapse is the most common predisposing condition found in young adults, and it is the predisposing condition in 30% of cases of NVE in this age group. Infective endocarditis complicates 5% of cases of asymmetrical septal hypertrophy and usually involves the mitral valve.

eMedicine Logo

Pathophysiology

Infective endocarditis develops most commonly on the mitral valve, closely followed in descending order of frequency by the aortic valve, the combined mitral and aortic valve, the tricuspid valve, and, rarely, the pulmonic valve. Mechanical prosthetic and bioprosthetic valves exhibit equal rates of infection.

All cases of IE develop from a commonly shared process, as follows:

  1. Bacteremia (nosocomial or spontaneous) that delivers the organisms to the surface of the valve
  2. Adherence of the organisms
  3. Eventual invasion of the valvular leaflets

The common denominator for adherence and invasion is nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis, a sterile fibrin-platelet vegetation. The development of subacute IE depends on a bacterial inoculum sufficient to allow invasion of the preexistent thrombus. This critical mass is the result of bacterial clumping produced by agglutinating antibodies.

In acute IE, the thrombus may be produced by the invading organism (ie, S aureus) or by valvular trauma from intravenous catheters or pacing wires (ie, HCIE). S aureus can invade the endothelial cells (endotheliosis) and increase the expression of adhesion molecules and of procoagulant activity on the cellular surface. Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis may result from stress, renal failure, malnutrition, systemic lupus erythematosus, or neoplasia.

The Venturi effect also contributes to the development and location of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis. This principle explains why bacteria and the fibrin-platelet thrombus are deposited on the sides of the low-pressure sink that lies just beyond a narrowing or stenosis.

In patients with mitral insufficiency, bacteria and the fibrin-platelet thrombus are located on the atrial surface of the valve. In patients with aortic insufficiency, they are located on the ventricular side. In these examples, the atria and ventricles are the low-pressure sinks. In the case of a ventricular septal defect, the low-pressure sink is the right ventricle, and the thrombus is found on the right side of the defect.

Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis also may form on the endocardium of the right ventricle, opposite the orifice that has been damaged by the jet of blood flowing through the defect (ie, the MacCallum patch).

The microorganisms that most commonly produce endocarditis (ie, S aureus; Streptococcus viridans; groups A, C, and G streptococci; enterococci) resist the bactericidal action of complement and possess fibronectin receptors for the surface of the fibrin-platelet thrombus. Among the many other characteristics of IE-producing bacteria demonstrated in vitro and in vivo, some features include the following:

  • Increased adherence to aortic valve leaflet disks by enterococci, S viridans, and S aureus

  • Mucoid-producing strains of S aureus

  • Dextran-producing strains of S viridans

  • Streptococcus viridans and enterococci that possess FimA surface adhesin

  • Platelet aggregation by S aureus and S viridans and resistance of S aureus to platelet microbicidal proteins

The pathogenesis of pacemaker IE is similar. Shortly after implantation, a fibrin-platelet thrombus (similar to the nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis described above) involves the generator box and conducting leads. After 1 week, the connective tissue proliferates, partially embedding the leads in the wall of the vein and endocardium. This layer may offer partial protection against infection during a bacteremia.

Bacteremia (either spontaneous or resulting from an invasive procedure) infects the sterile fibrin-platelet vegetation described above. Bloodstream infections develop from various extracardiac types of infection, such as pneumonias or pyelonephritis, but most commonly from gingival disease. Of those with high-grade gingivitis, 10% have recurrent transient bacteremias (usually streptococcal species). Most cases of subacute disease are secondary to the bacteremias that develop from the activities of daily living (eg, tooth brushing, bowel movements).

The skin is quite resistant to S aureus infection, largely owing to its production of antimicrobial peptides. Soong et al discovered that, in vitro, the secretion of alpha toxin by S aureus allows the organism to successfully penetrate the keratinocyte layer. This could explain the presence of staphylococcal bacteremia in the absence of any gross damage to the epithelial layer. [26]

Bacteremia can result from various invasive procedures, ranging from oral surgery to sclerotherapy of esophageal varices to genitourinary surgeries to various abdominal operations. The potential for invasive procedures to produce a bacteremia varies greatly. Procedures, rates, and organisms are as follows:

  • Endoscopy - Rate of 0-20%; coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), streptococci, diphtheroids

  • Colonoscopy - Rate of 0-20%; Escherichia coli, Bacteroides species

  • Barium enema - Rate of 0-20%; enterococci, aerobic and anaerobic gram-negative rods

  • Dental extractions - Rate of 40-100%; S viridans

  • Transesophageal echocardiography - Rate of 0-20%; S viridans, anaerobic organisms, streptococci

The incidence of nosocomial bacteremias, mostly associated with intravascular lines, has more than doubled in the last few years. Up to 90% of BSIs caused by these devices are secondary to the placement of various types of central venous catheters. Hickman and Broviac catheters are associated with the lowest rates, presumably because of their Dacron cuffs. Peripherally placed central venous catheters are associated with similar rates.

Intravascular catheters are infected from 1 of the following 4 sources:

  • Infection of the insertion site

  • Infection of the catheter

  • Bacteremia arising from another site

  • Contamination of the infused solution

Bacterial adherence to intravascular catheters depends on the response of the host to the presence of this foreign body, the properties of the organism itself, and the position of the catheter. Within a few days of insertion, a sleeve of fibrin and fibronectin is deposited on the catheter. Staphylococcus aureus adheres to the fibrin component.

Staphylococcus aureus also produces an infection of the endothelial cells (endotheliosis), which is important in producing the continuous bacteremia of S aureus BSIs. Endotheliosis may explain many cases of persistent methicillin-susceptible S aureus (MSSA) and MRSA catheter-related BSIs without an identifiable cause.

Staphylococcus aureus catheter-related BSIs occur even after an infected catheter is removed, apparently attributable to specific virulence factors of certain strains of S aureus that invade the adjacent endothelial cells. At some point, the staphylococci re-enter the bloodstream, resulting in bacteremia. [28, 29, 30, 31]

Four days after placement, the risk for infection markedly increases. Lines inserted into the internal jugular vein are more prone to infection than those placed in the subclavian vein. Colonization of the intracutaneous tract most likely is the source of short-term catheter-related BSIs. Among lines in place for more than 2 weeks, infection of the hub is the major source of bacteremia. In some cases, the infusion itself may be a reservoir of infection.

Colonization of heart valves by microorganisms is a complex process. Most transient bacteremias are short-lived, are without consequence, and often are unpreventable. Bacteria rarely adhere to an endocardial nidus before the microorganisms are removed from the circulation by various host defenses.

Once microorganisms establish themselves on the surface of the vegetation, the process of platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition accelerates at the site. As the bacteria multiply, they are covered by ever-thickening layers of platelets and thrombin, which protect them from neutrophils and other host defenses. Organisms deep in the vegetation hibernate because of the paucity of available nutrients and therefore are less susceptible to bactericidal antimicrobials that interfere with bacterial cell wall synthesis.

Complications of subacute endocarditis result from embolization, slowly progressive valvular destruction, and various immunologic mechanisms. The pathologic picture of subacute IE is marked by valvular vegetations in which bacteria colonies are present both on and below the surface.

The cellular reaction in subacute bacterial endocarditis primarily is that of mononuclear cells and lymphocytes, with few polymorphonuclear cells. The surface of the valve beneath the vegetation shows few organisms. Proliferation of capillaries and fibroblasts is marked. Areas of healing are scattered among areas of destruction. Over time, the healing process falls behind, and valvular insufficiency develops secondary to perforation of the cusps and damage to the chordae tendineae. Compared with acute disease, little extension of the infectious process occurs beyond the valvular leaflets.

Levels of agglutinating and complement-fixing bactericidal antibodies and cryoglobulins are markedly increased in patients with subacute endocarditis. Many of the extracardiac manifestations of this form of the disease result from circulating immune complexes. These include glomerulonephritis, peripheral manifestations (eg, Osler nodes, Roth spots, subungual hemorrhages), and, possibly, various musculoskeletal abnormalities. Janeway lesions usually arise from infected microemboli.

The microscopic appearance of acute bacterial endocarditis differs markedly from that of subacute disease. Vegetations that contain no fibroblasts develop rapidly, with no evidence of repair. Large amounts of both polymorphonuclear leukocytes and organisms are present in an ever-expanding area of necrosis. This process rapidly produces spontaneous rupture of the leaflets, of the papillary muscles, and of the chordae tendineae.

The complications of acute bacterial endocarditis result from intracardiac disease and metastatic infection produced by suppurative emboli not due to any immunological mechanisms.

eMedicine Logo

Etiology

The different types of IE have varying causes and involve different pathogens.

Native valve endocarditis

The following are the main underlying causes of NVE:

  • Rheumatic valvular disease (30% of NVE) - Primarily involves the mitral valve

  • Congenital heart disease (15% of NVE) - Underlying etiologies include a patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, or any native or surgical high-flow lesion

  • Mitral valve prolapse with an associated murmur (20% of NVE)

  • Degenerative heart disease - Including calcific aortic stenosis resulting from a bicuspid valve, Marfan syndrome, or syphilitic disease

Approximately 70% of infections in NVE are caused by Streptococcus species, including S viridans, S bovis, and enterococci. Staphylococcus species cause 25% of cases and generally demonstrate a more aggressive acute course.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis

Early prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), which presents shortly after surgery, has a different bacteriology and prognosis than late PVE, which presents in a subacute fashion similar to NVE.

Infection associated with aortic valve prostheses is particularly associated with local abscess and fistula formation, and valvular dehiscence. This may lead to shock, heart failure, heart block, shunting of blood to the right atrium, pericardial tamponade, and peripheral emboli to the central nervous system and elsewhere.

Early PVE may be caused by a variety of pathogens, including S aureus and S epidermidis. These nosocomially-acquired organisms often are methicillin-resistant (eg, MRSA). [29] Late disease most commonly is caused by streptococci. Overall, CoNS are the most frequent cause of PVE (30%).

Staphylococcus aureus causes 17% of early PVE and 12% of late PVE.

Corynebacterium, nonenterococcal streptococci, fungi (eg, C albicans, Candida stellatoidea, Aspergillus species), Legionella, and the HACEK (ie, Haemophilus aphrophilus, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae) organisms cause the remaining cases. [32]  

OUD infective endocarditis

Diagnosis of endocarditis in those who abuse IV drugs can be difficult and requires a high index of suspicion. Two thirds of patients have no previous history of heart disease or murmur on admission. A murmur may be absent in those with tricuspid disease, owing to the relatively small pressure gradient across this valve. Pulmonary manifestations may be prominent in patients with tricuspid infection: one third have pleuritic chest pain, and three quarters demonstrate chest radiographic abnormalities

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common (< 50% of cases) etiologic organism in patients with IVDA IE. MRSA accounts for an increasing portion of S aureus infections and has been associated with previous hospitalizations, long-term addiction, and nonprescribed antibiotic use. Groups A, C, and G streptococci and enterococci also are recovered from patients with IVDA IE.

Gram-negative organisms are involved infrequently. Pseudomonas aeruginosa [24] and the HACEK family are the most common examples.

Please see COVID-19's Effect on Infective Endocarditis in People Who Inject Drugs.

Healthcare-associated infective endocarditis

Endocarditis may be associated with therapeutic modalities involving intravascular devices such as central or peripheral intravenous catheters, rhythm control devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators, hemodialysis shunts and catheters, and chemotherapeutic and hyperalimentation lines. These patients tend to have significant comorbidities, more advanced age, and predominant infection with S aureus. The mortality rate is high in this group.

The gram-positive cocci (ie, S aureus, CoNS, enterococci, nonenterococcal streptococci) are the most common pathogens of HCIE

Fungal endocarditis

Fungal endocarditis is found in IV drug users and intensive care unit patients who receive broad-spectrum antibiotics. [2]  Blood cultures may be negative. Microscopic examination of large emboli may detect the organism.

Candida auris is particularly concerning since most infections are recognized in healthcare facilities and can rapidly spread throughout a given facility and between that facility and previously uninfected sites. There were at least 8200 cases in the United States in 2022. Cleaning or disinfecting infected surfaces, including patient's skin, is ineffective. The organism typically is resistant to many antifungals. [33, 34]

Culture negative endocarditis

Many cases are due to inappropriate institution antibiotics prior to obtaining adequately drawn blood cultures. [35]  

Clinical features associated with different pathogens

Table 1. Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis According to Causative Organism (Open Table in a new window)

Causative Organism(s)

Clinical Features of IE

Staphylococcus aureus

  • Overall, S aureus infection is the most common cause of IE, including PVE, acute IE, and IVDA IE.

  • Approximately 35-60.5% of staphylococcal bacteremias are complicated by IE.

  • More than half of cases are not associated with underlying valvular disease.

  • The mortality rate for S aureus IE is 40-50%.

  • Staphylococcus aureus infection is the second most common cause of nosocomial BSIs, second only to CoNS infection.

  • The incidence of MRSA infections, both the hospital- and community-acquired varieties, has dramatically increased (50% of isolates). Sixty percent of individuals are intermittent carriers of MRSA or MSSA.

  • The primary risk factor for S aureus BSI is the presence of intravascular lines. Other risk factors include cancer, diabetes, corticosteroid use, IVDA, alcoholism, and renal failure.

  • The realization that approximately 50% of hospital- and community-acquired staphylococcal bacteremias arise from infected vascular catheters has led to the reclassification of staphylococcal BSIs. BSIs are carried not only in the hospital but also in any type of healthcare facility (eg, nursing home, dialysis center).

  • Of S aureus bacteremia cases in the United States, 7.8% (200,000) per year are associated with intravascular catheters.

Streptococcus viridans

  • This organism accounts for approximately 50-60% of cases of subacute disease.

  • Most clinical signs and symptoms are mediated immunologically.

  • S gordonii has migrated from Norway to the United States over the last 15 years. It characteristically is associated with a sterile inflammatory response manifest after the bacterial component has been successfully treated. 

Streptococcus intermedius group
  • These infections may be acute or subacute.

  • Streptococcus intermedius infection accounts for 15% of streptococcal IE cases.

  • Members of the S intermedius group, especially S anginosus, are unique among the streptococci in that they can actively invade tissue and form abscesses, often in the CNS.

Abiotrophia

  • Approximately 5% of subacute cases of IE are due to infection with Abiotrophia species.

  • They require metabolically active forms of vitamin Bfor growth.

  • This type of IE is associated with large vegetations that lead to embolization and a high rate of posttreatment relapse.

Group D streptococci

  • Most cases are subacute.

  • The source is the gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract.

  • It is the third most common cause of IE.

  • They pose major resistance problems for antibiotics.

Nonenterococcal group D

  • The clinical course is subacute.

  • Infection often reflects underlying abnormalities of the large bowel (eg, ulcerative colitis, polyps, cancer).

  • The organisms are sensitive to penicillin.

Group B streptococci

  • Acute disease develops in pregnant patients and older patients with underlying diseases (eg, cancer, diabetes, alcoholism).

  • The mortality rate is 40%.

  • Complications include metastatic infection, arterial thrombi, and congestive heart failure.

  • It often requires valve replacement for cure.

Group A, C, and G streptococci

  • Acute disease resembles that of S aureus IE (30-70% mortality rate), with suppurative complications.

  • Group A organisms respond to penicillin alone.

  • Group C and G organisms require a combination of synergistic antibiotics (as with enterococci).

Coagulase-negative S aureus

  • This causes subacute disease.

  • It behaves similarly to S viridans infection.

  • It accounts for approximately 30% of PVE cases and less than 5% of NVE cases.

Staphylococcus lugdunensis

  • Staphylococcus lugdunensis is another coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species but is extremely aggressive compared to coagulase-positive S aureusS lugdunensis frequently causes IE.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

  • This is usually acute, except when it involves the right side of the heart in IVDA IE.

  • Surgery is commonly required for cure.

HACEK (ie, Haemophilus aphrophilus, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae)

  • These organisms usually cause subacute disease.

  • They account for approximately 5% of IE cases.

  • They are the most common gram-negative organisms isolated from patients with IE.

  • Complications may include massive arterial emboli and congestive heart failure.

  • Cure requires ampicillin, gentamicin, and surgery.

Fungal

  • These usually cause subacute disease.

  • The most common organism of both fungal NVE and fungal PVE is Candida albicans.

  • Fungal IVDA IE is usually caused by Candida parapsilosis or Candida tropicalis.

  • Aspergillus species are observed in fungal PVE and NIE.

  • Candida auris is progressively contaminating all types of healthcare facilities worldwide 

Bartonella

  • The most involved species is Bartonella quintana.

  • Infective endocarditis typically develops in homeless males who have extremely substandard hygiene. Bartonella must be considered in cases of culture-negative endocarditis among homeless individuals.

Multiple pathogens (polymicrobial

  • Pseudomonas and enterococci are the most common combination of organisms.

  • It is observed in cases of IVDA IE

  • The cardiac surgery mortality rate is twice that associated with single-agent IE.

Risk factors

The most significant risk factor for IE is residual valvular damage caused by a previous attack of endocarditis.

eMedicine Logo

Epidemiology

In the United States, the incidence of IE is approximately 12.7 cases per 100,000 persons per year. [36]  The incidence of IE in other countries is similar to that in the United States. The proportion of patients with intracardiac devices has increased from 13.3% to 18.9%, whereas the proportion of cases with a background of HIV infection has decreased.

The mean age of patients has increased from 58.6 to 60.8 years and continues to rise; more than 50% of patients are older than 50 years. [31]  Mendiratta and colleagues, in their retrospective study of hospital discharges of patients aged 65 years and older with a primary or secondary diagnosis of IE, found that hospitalizations for IE increased 26%, from 3.19 per 10,000 elderly patients to 3.95 per 10,000. IE is 3 times more common in males than in females. There appears to be no racial predilection. [37, 38]

eMedicine Logo

Prognosis

Prognosis largely depends on whether complications develop. Early detection and appropriate treatment of this uncommon disease can be lifesaving. The overall mortality rate has remained stable at 14.5%. There has been no overall improvement in outcomes of IE of congenital heart disease. 

Cure rates for appropriately managed (including both medical and surgical therapies) NVE are as follows:

  • For S viridans and S bovis infection, the rate is 98%.

  • For enterococci and S aureus infection in individuals who abuse intravenous drugs, the rate is 90%.

  • For community-acquired S aureus infection in individuals who do not abuse intravenous drugs, the rate is 60-70%.

  • For infection with aerobic gram-negative organisms, the rate is 40-60%.

  • For infection with fungal organisms, the rate is lower than 50%.

For PVE, the cure rates are as follows:

  • Rates are 10-15% lower for each of the above categories, for both early and late PVE.

  • Surgery is required far more frequently.

  • Approximately 60% of early CoNS PVE cases and 70% of late CoNS PVE cases are curable.

Anecdotal reports describe the resolution of right-sided valvular infection caused by S aureus infection in individuals who abuse IV drugs after just a few days of oral antibiotics.

The role of early valvular surgery in reducing mortality among patients with IE has become somewhat clearer. Challenges to resolving this question include the necessity of performing multicentered studies with an apparent difficulty of ensuring that the patients' preoperative assessments and surgical approaches are comparable. The largest study to date indicates that in cases of IE complicated by heart failure, valvular surgery reduces the 1-year mortality rate. More recent studies document that early surgery in patients, especially those with large vegetations, significantly reduces the risk for death from any cause. [39, 40, 41, 42]

Mortality rates in NVE range from 16-27%, and mortality rates in patients with PVE are higher. More than 50% of these infections occur within 2 months after surgery. The fatality rate of pacemaker IE ranges up to 34%. [43, 44, 45, 46, 47]

Increased mortality rates are associated with older age, infection involving the aortic valve, development of congestive heart failure, central nervous system complications, and underlying disease such as diabetes mellitus. Catastrophic neurological events of all types resulting from IE are highly predictive of morbidity and mortality.

Mortality rates vary with the infecting organism. Acute endocarditis caused by S aureus is associated with a high mortality rate (30-40%), except when it is associated with IV drug use, [26]  whereas IE resulting from streptococci has a mortality rate of approximately 10%. [48]

eMedicine Logo

Patient Education

Surveys indicate that an appallingly small number of patients who are at risk of developing IE understand antibiotic and nonpharmacologic (ie, appropriate oral hygiene) principles. Drug rehabilitation for patients who use IV drugs is critical.

The United Kingdom’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) addresses patient education in its guideline on prophylaxis against IE in adults and children undergoing interventional procedures. The NICE guideline recommends that healthcare professionals teach patients about the symptoms of IE and the risks of nonmedical invasive procedures such as body piercing and tattooing, explain the benefits and risks of antibiotic prophylaxis and the reasons that it is no longer routine, and emphasize the need to maintain good oral health. [49]  

eMedicine Logo

COVID-19 and IE

COVID-19 infections may occur concurrently with, precede, or follow cases of IE. Most were males with a mean age of 52.2 years. The most common pathogens were S aureus (38.1%), E faecalis (14.3 %), and Strep minis (2%); 33% required cardiac surgery and 2.8% died. [13]  S aureus IE has been mistakenly diagnosed as Multisystem Inflammatory Response Syndrome. [8, 11]  Symptoms, chest x-ray findings, vital signs, and screening laboratory tests are shared by both. In such situations, the best approach is the application of SA that would indicate performing a COVID-19 test as well as screening for IE as discussed above.

Cardiac infection may present months after active COVID in individuals with no previous predisposing conditions. It can present as myocarditis with persistence of the virus in the myocardium, bacterial IE, or as non- bacterial thromboendocarditis. The cause of both is related to the viral infection and the intense systemic inflammatory and thrombotic response triggered by it. [50]  

COVID-19 infection may lead to IE by its ability to produce visceral thrombosis. These can occur prior to treatment in the community or as the individual is receiving treatment in a variety of healthcare institutions. The primary cause of such is a variety of intravascular lines, any of which can lead to a transient BSI resulting in endocardial infection.

The initial fevers of COVID-19 usually are due to the virus and the resulting thrombotic and inflammatory processes. At the 7-day mark, bacterial or fungal infections must be ruled out including a thorough reevaluation for IE that includes echocardiography.

Please see COVID-19's Effect on Infective Endocarditis in People Who Inject Drugs.

Table 2. Differential Diagnoses of IE During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Open Table in a new window)

  • COVID-19 infection with or without IE

  • Deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism

  • Bacterial pneumonia superimposed on COVID-19 pneumonia

  • Influenza A, influenza B

  • Respiratory syncytial virus

  • Osteomyelitis

  • Abscess formation (eg, spinal abscess)

  • Renal and splenic embolic infarcts 

  • Hepatitis B, hepatitis C

  • HIV

  • Tuberculosis

eMedicine Logo

  1. John L Brusch MD. infective endocarditis and it’s mimics in the critical care unit. Cunha CB , Cunha BA. inInfectious diseases and antimicrobial stewardship in critical care medicine. Fourth. NY,NY: CRC Press; 2020. Four: 255-263.

  2. Guzek A, Braksator W, Gąsior Z, Kuśmierczyk M, Różański J, Rybicki Z. Infective endocarditis - can we treat it more effectively?. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2020 Mar. 17 (1):8-14. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  3. Hackett AJ, Stuart J. Infective endocarditis: identification and management in the emergency department. Emerg Med Pract. 2020 Sep. 22 (9):1-24. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  4. Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke Endocarditis Service. Am J Med. 1994 Mar. 96 (3):200-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  5. Li js ,Sexton dj , mick n, et al. Proposed modifications to the duke criteria. CID. 2000. 3096:633-638.

  6. Fowler VG, Durak DT, Selton-Suty C, et al. The 2023 Duke-ISCVID Criteria for Infective Endocarditis: Updating the Modified Duke Criteria. CID. May 2023. 200. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  7. Burke A. Cunha. Diagnostic Reasoning and Clinical Problem Solving. Cheston B. Cunha, Burke A. Cunha. Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Stewardship in Critical Care Medicine. 4th. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2020. 3-13.

  8. John Brusch. Infectious Endocarditis. Cunha. Schlossberg Cln infectious disease. 3. NY,NY: Oxford; 2022. 3: 243-254.

  9. Brusch JL. Infective endocarditis and its mimics in the critical care unit. Cunha BA, ed. Infectious Diseases in Critical Care. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2007. 261-2.

  10. Popovich KJ, Weinstein RA. Questioning Old Staphylococcus aureus Beliefs With New Technology. J Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 26. 227 (9):1028-1030. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  11. Bajdechi M, Vlad ND, Dumitrascu M, Mocanu E, Dumitru IM, Cernat RC, et al. Bacterial endocarditis masked by COVID-19: A case report. Exp Ther Med. 2022 Feb. 23 (2):186. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  12. Hayes DE, Rhee DW, Hisamoto K, Smith D, Ro R, Vainrib AF, et al. Two cases of acute endocarditis misdiagnosed as COVID-19 infection. Echocardiography. 2021 May. 38 (5):798-804. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  13. Quintero-Martinez JA, Hindy JR, Mahmood M, Gerberi DJ, DeSimone DC, Baddour LM. A clinical profile of infective endocarditis in patients with recent COVID-19: A systematic review. Am J Med Sci. 2022 Jul. 364 (1):16-22. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  14. Demetriades P, Ridley P, Yazdani F, Duckett S. Challenges of remote consultations: a delayed diagnosis of aortic valve endocarditis complicated by recurrent intracranial events. BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Feb 28. 15 (2):[QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  15. George A, Alampoondi Venkataramanan SV, John KJ, Mishra AK. Infective endocarditis and COVID -19 coinfection: An updated review. Acta Biomed. 2022 Mar 14. 93 (1):e2022030. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  16. Lerner PI, Weinstein L. Infective endocarditis in the antibiotic era. N Engl J Med. 1966 Feb 17. 274(7):388-93 concl. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  17. Gorbovitskiĭ EB, Levitskiĭ ER, Petropavlovskaia NN, et al. [Effect of adsorbent encapsulation on its effectiveness in removing metabolites of varying molecular weights]. Probl Gematol Pereliv Krovi. 1981 Feb. 26 (2):55-7. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  18. El-Dalati S, Cronin D, Riddell J 4th, Shea M, Weinberg RL, Stoneman E, et al. A step-by-step guide to implementing a multidisciplinary endocarditis team. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2021 Jan-Dec. 8:20499361211065596. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  19. Rawson TM, Hernandez B, Moore LSP, Herrero P, Charani E, Ming D, et al. A Real-world Evaluation of a Case-based Reasoning Algorithm to Support Antimicrobial Prescribing Decisions in Acute Care. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15. 72 (12):2103-2111. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  20. Lerner PI, Weinstein L. Infective endocarditis in the antibiotic era. N Engl J Med. 1966 Feb 3. 274(5):259-66 contd. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  21. Lerner PI, Weinstein L. Infective endocarditis in the antibiotic era. N Engl J Med. 1966 Jan 27. 274(4):199-206 contd. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  22. Brusch J. Infective Endocarditis: Management in the Era of Intravascular Devices. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2007.

  23. Weinstein LW, Brusch JL. Infective Endocarditis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.

  24. Wang A, Athan E, Pappas PA, Fowler VG Jr, Olaison L, Paré C, et al. Contemporary clinical profile and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA. 2007 Mar 28. 297(12):1354-61. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  25. Schranz AJ, Fleischauer A, Chu VH, Wu LT, Rosen DL. Trends in Drug Use-Associated Infective Endocarditis and Heart Valve Surgery, 2007 to 2017: A Study of Statewide Discharge Data. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 4. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  26. Soong G, Chun J, Parker D, Prince A. Staphylococcus aureus activation of caspase 1/calpain signaling mediates invasion through human keratinocytes. J Infect Dis. 2012 May 15. 205(10):1571-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].

  27. Snygg-Martin U, Giang KW, Dellborg M, Robertson J, Mandalenakis Z. Cumulative Incidence of Infective Endocarditis in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease: A Nationwide, Case-Control Study Over Nine Decades. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 20. 73 (8):1469-1475. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  28. Kourtis Ap, hartfield k. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis--a contemporary update based on the International Collaboration on Endocarditis: prospective cohort study. Mmwr morb mortal Willy rep. 2019. 68:214-219.

  29. Reyes MP, Ali A, Mendes RE, Biedenbach DJ. Resurgence of Pseudomonas endocarditis in Detroit, 2006-2008. Medicine (Baltimore). 2009 Sep. 88(5):294-301. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  30. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler VG Jr, Bayer AS, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Mar 9. 169(5):463-73. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  31. Baddour LM, Cha YM, Wilson WR. Clinical practice. Infections of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30. 367(9):842-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  32. Kingsford L, Mendoza R, Dillon J, Chun CA, Vu KP. Broadening and Diversifying the Behavioral and Biomedical Research Workforce through Early Access to an Undergraduate Research Training Program. UI J. 2022 Fall. 13 (2):1-24. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  33. Alvarez-Moreno CA, Morales-López S, Rodriguez GJ, et al. The Mortality Attributable to Candidemia in C. auris Is Higher than That in Other Candida Species: Myth or Reality?. J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Mar 31. 9 (4):[QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  34. Fuller R, Jacobs SE. Candida Infectious Endocarditis and Implantable Cardiac Device Infections. Mycopathologia. 2023 Jun 5. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  35. Lin KP, Yeh TK, Chuang YC, Wang LA, Fu YC, Liu PY. Blood Culture Negative Endocarditis: A Review of Laboratory Diagnostic Approaches. Int J Gen Med. 2023. 16:317-327. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  36. Bor DH, Woolhandler S, Nardin R, Brusch J, Himmelstein DU. Infective endocarditis in the u.s., 1998-2009: a nationwide study. PLoS One. 2013. 8(3):e60033. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].

  37. Alnabelsi TS, Sinner G, Al-Abdouh A, Marji M, Viquez K, Abusnina W, et al. The Evolving Trends in Infective Endocarditis and Determinants of Mortality: a 10-year Experience From a Tertiary Care Epicenter. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Jun. 48 (6):101673. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  38. Sonneville R, Mirabel M, Hajage D, et al. Neurologic complications and outcomes of infective endocarditis in critically ill patients: The ENDOcardite en REAnimation prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun. 39(6):1474-1481. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  39. Baddley JW, Benjamin DK Jr, Patel M, Miró J, Athan E, Barsic B, et al. Candida infective endocarditis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Jul. 27(7):519-29. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].

  40. Hill EE, Herijgers P, Claus P, Vanderschueren S, Herregods MC, Peetermans WE. Infective endocarditis: changing epidemiology and predictors of 6-month mortality: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2007 Jan. 28(2):196-203. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  41. Liu PY, Huang YF, Tang CW, Chen YY, Hsieh KS, Ger LP, et al. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infective endocarditis: a literature review and analysis of risk factors. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2010 Dec. 43 (6):478-84. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  42. Wallace SM, Walton BI, Kharbanda RK, Hardy R, Wilson AP, Swanton RH. Mortality from infective endocarditis: clinical predictors of outcome. Heart. 2002 Jul. 88(1):53-60. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].

  43. Di Salvo G, Habib G, Pergola V, Avierinos JF, Philip E, Casalta JP, et al. Echocardiography predicts embolic events in infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 15. 37(4):1069-76. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  44. Ortiz-Bautista C, López J, García-Granja PE, Vilacosta I, Sevilla T, Sarriá C, et al. Right-sided infective endocarditis in cardiac device carriers: Clinical profile and prognosis. Med Clin (Barc). 2017 Jun 22. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  45. Özcan C, Raunsø J, Lamberts M, Køber L, Lindhardt TB, Bruun NE, et al. Infective endocarditis and risk of death after cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: a nationwide cohort study. Europace. 2017 Jan 10. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  46. Cresti A, Chiavarelli M, Scalese M, Nencioni C, Valentini S, Guerrini F, et al. Epidemiological and mortality trends in infective endocarditis, a 17-year population-based prospective study. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Feb. 7 (1):27-35. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  47. Janga KC, Sinha A, Greenberg S, Sharma K. Nephrologists Hate the Dialysis Catheters: A Systemic Review of Dialysis Catheter Associated Infective Endocarditis. Case Rep Nephrol. 2017. 2017:9460671. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  48. Hémar V, Camou F, Roubaud-Baudron C, Ternacle J, Pernot M, Greib C, et al. The Mortality of Infective endocarditis with and without Surgery in the Elderly (MoISE) study. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 27. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  49. [Guideline] National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Prophylaxis against infective endocarditis. Antimicrobial prophylaxis against infective endocarditis in adults and children undergoing interventional procedures. 2008. (NICE clinical guideline No. 64).

  50. Blagova OV, Kogan EA, Lutokhina YA, Kukleva AD, Ainetdinova DH, Novosadov VM, et al. Subacute and chronic post-covid myoendocarditis: clinical presentation, role of coronavirus persistence and autoimmune mechanisms. Kardiologiia. 2021 Jul 1. 61 (6):11-27. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  51. Terpenning MS, Buggy BP, Kauffman CA. Infective endocarditis: clinical features in young and elderly patients. Am J Med. 1987 Oct. 83(4):626-34. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  52. Bansal RC. Infective endocarditis. Med Clin North Am. 1995 Sep. 79(5):1205-40. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  53. Rahman S, O'Connor AL, Becker SL, Patel RK, Martindale RG, Tsikitis VL. Gut microbial metabolites and its impact on human health. Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Aug. 36 (4):360-368. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  54. Masuya R, Muraji T, Kanaan SB, Harumatsu T, Muto M, Toma M, et al. Circulating maternal chimeric cells have an impact on the outcome of biliary atresia. Front Pediatr. 2022. 10:1007927. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  55. Snygg-Martin U, Gustafsson L, Rosengren L, Alsiö A, Ackerholm P, Andersson R, et al. Cerebrovascular complications in patients with left-sided infective endocarditis are common: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging and neurochemical brain damage markers. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 1. 47(1):23-30. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  56. Weinstein L. Life-threatening complications of infective endocarditis and their management. Arch Intern Med. 1986 May. 146(5):953-7. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  57. Weinstein L, Schlesinger JJ. Pathoanatomic, pathophysiologic and clinical correlations in endocarditis (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1974 Oct 17. 291(16):832-7. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  58. Wang CC, Lee CH, Chan CY, Chen HW. Splenic infarction and abscess complicating infective endocarditis. Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Oct. 27(8):1021.e3-5. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  59. Kradin RL. Pathology of infective endocarditis. Brusch JL, ed. Infective Endocarditis: Management in the Era of Intravascular Devices. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2007. 101-18.

  60. Brusch JL. Pathoanatomical, pathophysiological and clinical correlations. Brusch JL, ed. Infective Endocarditis: Management in the Era of Intravascular Devices. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2007. 119-41.

  61. Tonelli A, Lumngwena EN, Ntusi NAB. The oral microbiome in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Jun. 20 (6):386-403. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  62. Quintero-Martinez JA, Hindy JR, Mahmood M, Gerberi DJ, DeSimone DC, Baddour LM. A clinical profile of infective endocarditis in patients with recent COVID-19: A systematic review. Am J Med Sci. 2022 Jul. 364 (1):16-22. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  63. Éliás AJ, Barna V, Patoni C, Demeter D, Veres DS, Bunduc S, et al. Probiotic supplementation during antibiotic treatment is unjustified in maintaining the gut microbiome diversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2023 Jul 19. 21 (1):262. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  64. Mayer S, Bonhag C, Jenkins P, Cornett B, Watts P, Scherbak D. Probiotic-Associated Central Venous Catheter Bloodstream Infections Lead to Increased Mortality in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2023 Jun 1. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  65. Khatib R, Riederer K, Saeed S, Johnson LB, Fakih MG, Sharma M, et al. Time to positivity in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: possible correlation with the source and outcome of infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 1. 41(5):594-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  66. Lee A, Mirrett S, Reller LB, Weinstein MP. Detection of bloodstream infections in adults: how many blood cultures are needed?. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Nov. 45(11):3546-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].

  67. [Guideline] Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O'Grady NP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 1. 49(1):1-45. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  68. Weinstein MP. Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jun. 41(6):2275-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].

  69. Casella F, Rana B, Casazza G, Bhan A, Kapetanakis S, Omigie J, et al. The potential impact of contemporary transthoracic echocardiography on the management of patients with native valve endocarditis: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2009 Sep. 26(8):900-6. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  70. Archibald LK, Pallangyo K, Kazembe P, Reller LB. Blood culture contamination in Tanzania, Malawi, and the United States: a microbiological tale of three cities. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Dec. 44(12):4425-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].

  71. Thuny F, Grisoli D, Collart F, Habib G, Raoult D. Management of infective endocarditis: challenges and perspectives. Lancet. 2012 Mar 10. 379(9819):965-75. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  72. Falagas ME, Manta KG, Ntziora F, Vardakas KZ. Linezolid for the treatment of patients with endocarditis: a systematic review of the published evidence. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Aug. 58(2):273-80. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  73. Sridhar AR, Lavu M, Yarlagadda V, Reddy M, Gunda S, Afzal R, et al. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infection and Extraction Trends in the U.S. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar. 40 (3):286-293. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  74. Buchan BW, Windham S, Balada-Llasat JM, Leber A, et al. Practical Comparison of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel to Routine Diagnostic Methods and Potential Impact on Antimicrobial Stewardship in Adult Hospitalized Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jun 24. 58 (7):[QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  75. [Guideline] Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, Beller GA, Bierman FZ, Davis JL, et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Circulation. 2003 Sep 2. 108(9):1146-62. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  76. Jassal DS, Picard MH. Echocardiography. Brusch JL, ed. Infective Endocarditis: Management in the Era of Intravascular Devices. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2007. 255-72.

  77. Roe MT, Abramson MA, Li J, Heinle SK, Kisslo J, Corey GR, et al. Clinical information determines the impact of transesophageal echocardiography on the diagnosis of infective endocarditis by the duke criteria. Am Heart J. 2000 Jun. 139(6):945-51. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  78. Feuchtner GM, Stolzmann P, Dichtl W, Schertler T, Bonatti J, Scheffel H, et al. Multislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Feb 3. 53(5):436-44. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  79. Chen W, Sajadi MM, Dilsizian V. Merits of FDG PET/CT and Functional Molecular Imaging Over Anatomic Imaging With Echocardiography and CT Angiography for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Device Infections. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov. 11 (11):1679-1691. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  80. Fowler VG Jr, Boucher HW, Corey GR, Abrutyn E, Karchmer AW, Rupp ME, et al. Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 17. 355(7):653-65. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  81. Iversen K, Ihlemann N, Gill SU, Madsen T, Elming H, Jensen KT, et al. Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 28. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  82. Cunha BA. Persistent S. aureus acute bacteremia: clinical pathway for diagnosis and treatment. Antibiot for Clin. 2006. 10:39-46.

  83. Tansarli GS, Chapin KC. A Closer Look at the Laboratory Impact of Utilizing ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels: a Workflow Analysis Using Rapid Molecular Detection for Positive Blood Cultures. Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26. 10 (5):e0179622. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  84. Yee R, Dien Bard J, Simner PJ. The Genotype-to-Phenotype Dilemma: How Should Laboratories Approach Discordant Susceptibility Results?. J Clin Microbiol. 2021 May 19. 59 (6):[QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  85. Pujol M, Miró JM, Shaw E, Aguado JM, et al. Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 4. 72 (9):1517-1525. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  86. Buckholz K, Larsen CT. Severity of gentamicin is nephrotoxic effect on patients with infective endocarditis: a prospective observation of cohort study of 373 patients. Clinical Infect Dis. 2009. 48:65-71.

  87. Jones T, Yeaman MR, Sakoulas G, Yang SJ, Proctor RA, Sahl HG, et al. Failures in clinical treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Infection with daptomycin are associated with alterations in surface charge, membrane phospholipid asymmetry, and drug binding. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jan. 52(1):269-78. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].

  88. Bailey J, Summers KM. Dalbavancin: a new lipoglycopeptide antibiotic. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Apr 1. 65 (7):599-610. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  89. Kaasch AJ, Jung N. Editorial Commentary: Transesophageal Echocardiography in Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection--Always Needed?. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 1. 61 (1):29-30. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  90. Fowler VG Jr, Miro JM, Hoen B, Cabell CH, Abrutyn E, Rubinstein E, et al. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress. JAMA. 2005 Jun 22. 293(24):3012-21. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  91. Khatib R, Johnson LB, Fakih MG, Riederer K, Khosrovaneh A, Shamse Tabriz M, et al. Persistence in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: incidence, characteristics of patients and outcome. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006. 38(1):7-14. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  92. Duval X, Selton-Suty C, Alla F, Salvador-Mazenq M, Bernard Y, Weber M, et al. Endocarditis in patients with a permanent pacemaker: a 1-year epidemiological survey on infective endocarditis due to valvular and/or pacemaker infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jul 1. 39(1):68-74. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  93. Sławiński G, Lewicka E, Kempa M, Budrejko S, Raczak G. Infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Epidemiology, classification, treatment, and prognosis. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Jul 26. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  94. Wilson WR, Gewitz M, Lockhart PB, Bolger AF, et al. Adapted from: Prevention of Viridans Group Streptococcal Infective Endocarditis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Nov. 152 (11):886-902.e2. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  95. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 28. 355(26):2725-32. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  96. Ferro P, Boni R, Bartoli F, Lazzeri F, Slart RHJA, Erba PA. Radionuclide Imaging of Infective Endocarditis. Cardiol Clin. 2023 May. 41 (2):233-249. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  97. Chesdachai S, Baddour LM, Sohail MR, Palraj BR, Madhavan M, Tabaja H, et al. Candidemia in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: Uncertainty in Management Based on Current International Guidelines. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jul. 10 (7):ofad318. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  98. Baddour LM, Esquer Garrigos Z, Rizwan Sohail M, et al. Update on Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infections and Their Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association: Endorsed by the International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases. Circulation. 2024 Jan 9. 149 (2):e201-e216. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  99. Bach DS. Perspectives on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for the prevention of infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 19. 53(20):1852-4. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  100. Thornhill MH, Dayer MJ, Forde JM, et al. Impact of the NICE guideline recommending cessation of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of infective endocarditis: before and after study. BMJ. 2011 May 3. 342:d2392. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].

  101. Satriano UM, Nenna A, Spadaccio C, Pollari F, Fischlein T, Chello M, et al. Guidelines on prosthetic heart valve management in infective endocarditis: a narrative review comparing American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec. 8 (23):1625. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  102. Slipczuk L, Codolosa JN, Davila CD, Romero-Corral A, Yun J, Pressman GS, et al. Infective endocarditis epidemiology over five decades: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013. 8 (12):e82665. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  103. Brusch JL. Legionnaire's Disease: Cardiac Manifestations. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017 Mar. 31 (1):69-80. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  104. Thornhill MH, Gibson TB, Cutler E, Dayer MJ, Chu VH, Lockhart PB, et al. Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Incidence of Endocarditis Before and After the 2007 AHA Recommendations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Nov 13. 72 (20):2443-2454. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  105. Janszky I, Gémes K, Ahnve S, Asgeirsson H, Möller J. Invasive Procedures Associated With the Development of Infective Endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jun 19. 71 (24):2744-2752. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  106. Forsblom E, Ruotsalainen E, Ollgren J, Järvinen A. Telephone consultation cannot replace bedside infectious disease consultation in the management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Feb. 56 (4):527-35. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  107. [Guideline] Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, et al. Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015 Oct 13. 132 (15):1435-86. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  108. Weber C, Luehr M, Petrov G, Misfeld M, et al. Impact of the 2009 ESC Guideline Change on Surgically Treated Infective Endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb 22. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  109. [Guideline] Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, Lockhart PB, Baddour LM, Levison M, et al. Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation. 2007 Oct 9. 116(15):1736-54. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].

  110. Tarakji,kg. bacterial envelope to prevent cardiac implantable device infections. new england J Med. may 16 2019. 380:3895.

Author

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Chief Editor

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD David Ross Boyd Professor and Chairman, Department of Medicine, Stewart G Wolf Endowed Chair in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center; Master of the American College of Physicians; Fellow, Infectious Diseases Society of America; Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, London

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, Association of Professors of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Oklahoma State Medical Association, Southern Society for Clinical Investigation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP Program Director, Emergency Medicine, Einstein Medical Center Montgomery

Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Thoracic Society, New York Academy of Medicine, New York Academy of Sciences, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jon Mark Hirshon, MD, MPH, PhD, FACEP Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine; Chief, Emergency Department, Baltimore VA Medical Center

Jon Mark Hirshon, MD, MPH, PhD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Public Health Association, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Keith A Marill, MD, MS Faculty, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital; Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School

Keith A Marill, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: InCarda Therapeutics<br/>Received ownership interest from General Electric and Medtronic for none. for: Equity ownership: GE Healthcare; Medtronic; Gilead; Cytodyn; Amgen; Pfizer.

Steven A Conrad, MD, PhD Chief, Department of Emergency Medicine; Chief, Multidisciplinary Critical Care Service, Professor, Department of Emergency and Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center

Steven A Conrad, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Critical Care Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physicians, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Louisiana State Medical Society, Shock Society, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Thomas M Kerkering, MD, FACP, FIDSA Professor of Medicine with Tenure, Division of Infectious Diseases, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine; Adjunct Professor, Department of Population Studies, Masters of Public Health Program, Virginia Tech University, School of Veterinary Medicine

Thomas M Kerkering, MD, FACP, FIDSA is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, American Public Health Association, American Society for Microbiology, American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Infectious Diseases Society of America, International Society for Human and Animal Mycology, Medical Society of Virginia, Roanoke Academy of Medicine, Virginia Infectious Diseases Society, Wilderness Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.