nature.com

Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity - Nature

  • ️Yan, Xie
  • ️Thu Apr 08 2004

References

  1. Chape, S., Fish, L., Fox, P. & Spalding, M. United Nations List of Protected Areas (IUCN/UNEP, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. The World Conservation Union. Parks For Life: Report of the IVth World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kamden-Toham, A. et al. Forest conservation in the Congo Basin. Science 299, 346 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Soulé, M. E. & Sanjayan, M. A. Conservation targets: do they help? Science 279, 2060–2061 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pressey, R. L., Cowling, R. M. & Rouget, M. Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 112, 99–127 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Margules, C. R. & Pressey, R. L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243–253 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott, J. M. et al. Gap analysis—a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildl. Monogr. 123, 1–41 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lacher, T. E. Jr in GIS Methodologies for Developing Conservation Strategies (eds Savitsky, B. G. & Lacher, T. E. Jr) 199–209 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jennings, M. D. Gap analysis: Concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecol. 15, 5–20 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scott, J. M. et al. Nature reserves: Do they capture the full range of America's biological diversity? Ecol. Appl. 11, 999–1007 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Andelman, S. J. & Willig, M. R. Present patterns and future prospects for biodiversity in the Western Hemisphere. Ecol. Lett. 6, 818–824 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pressey, R. L. Ad hoc reservations—Forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems? Conserv. Biol. 8, 662–668 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Newmark, W. D. Insularization of Tanzanian parks and the local extinction of large mammals. Conserv. Biol. 10, 1549–1556 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peres, C. A. & Lake, I. R. Extent of nontimber resource extraction in tropical forests: accessibility to game vertebrates by hunters in the Amazon basin. Conserv. Biol. 17, 521–535 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. The World Conservation Union, Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories (IUCN CNPPA/WCMC, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. & Wege, D. C. Endemic Bird Areas of the World—Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation (BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. BirdLife International. Threatened Birds of the World (Lynx Edicions/BirdLife International, Barcelona/Cambridge, UK, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. The World Conservation Union. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species [online] 〈http://www.redlist.org〉 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bruner, A. G., Gullison, R. E., Rice, R. E. & Fonseca, G. A. B. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291, 125–128 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas, C. D. et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145–148 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Green, M. J. B. & Paine, J. State of the World's Protected Areas at the End of the Twentieth Century (WCMC, Cambridge, UK, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Gaston, K. J. How large do reserve networks need to be? Ecol. Lett. 4, 602–609 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gaston, K. J. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405, 220–227 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cowling, R. M. & Pressey, R. L. Rapid plant diversification: planning for an evolutionary future. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5452–5457 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gaston, K. J. & May, R. M. Taxonomy of taxonomists. Nature 356, 281–282 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Balmford, A. et al. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297, 950–953 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. World Database on Protected Areas. World Database on Protected Areas (IUCN-WCPA/UNEP-WCMC, Washington DC, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Iverson, J. B., Kiester, A. R., Hughes, L. E. & Kimerling, A. J. The EMYSystem World Turtle Database 2003 [online] 〈http://emys.geo.orst.edu〉 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Moore Family Foundation, the Howard Gilman Foundation and the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis of the University of California Santa Barbara for support. The analysis was possible thanks to the combined effort of the thousands of individuals and hundreds of institutions who collected and compiled the data, or provided financial support for such efforts. We are grateful to the numerous individuals who contributed to this analysis, especially to K. Buhlmann, S. Butchart, N. Cox, P. P. van Dijk, J. Iverson, R. Kiester, T. Lacher and B. Young. H. Possingham made valuable comments on the manuscript. Figure 1 was generated by J. Seeber.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, Washington, DC, 20036, USA

    Ana S. L. Rodrigues, Thomas M. Brooks, Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca, Michael Hoffmann, John D. Pilgrim & Robert W. Waller

  2. IUCN-SSC/CI-CABS Biodiversity Assessment Unit, Conservation International, Washington, DC, 20036, USA

    Janice S. Long, Wes Sechrest & Simon N. Stuart

  3. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, 93101, USA

    Sandy J. Andelman

  4. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Gigiri Nairobi, Kenya

    Mohamed I. Bakarr

  5. Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell'Uomo, Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, 00185, Rome, Italy

    Luigi Boitani

  6. Terrestrial Ecology Research Unit, Department of Botany, University of Port Elizabeth, 6000, Port Elizabeth, South Africa

    Richard M. Cowling

  7. BirdLife International, CB3 0NA, Cambridge, UK

    Lincoln D. C. Fishpool

  8. Departmento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 31270, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

    Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca

  9. Biodiversity and Macroecology Group, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN, Sheffield, UK

    Kevin J. Gaston

  10. Center for Advanced Studies in Ecology and Biodiversity (CASEB) and Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 114-D, Santiago, Chile

    Pablo A. Marquet

  11. New South Wales Department of Environment and Conservation, Armidale, 2350, New South Wales, Australia

    Robert L. Pressey

  12. Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, University of Idaho, Idaho, 83844, Moscow, USA

    Jan Schipper

  13. Avian Demography Unit, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa

    Les G. Underhill

  14. 194W Hill Street, Walcha, 2354, New South Wales, Australia

    Matthew E. J. Watts

  15. Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100080, Beijing, China

    Xie Yan

Authors

  1. Ana S. L. Rodrigues

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandy J. Andelman

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed I. Bakarr

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luigi Boitani

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas M. Brooks

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Richard M. Cowling

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lincoln D. C. Fishpool

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kevin J. Gaston

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Michael Hoffmann

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Janice S. Long

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Pablo A. Marquet

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. John D. Pilgrim

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Robert L. Pressey

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jan Schipper

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Wes Sechrest

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Simon N. Stuart

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Les G. Underhill

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Robert W. Waller

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Matthew E. J. Watts

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Xie Yan

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana S. L. Rodrigues.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Notes on: data sources and limitations; background information regarding targets based on percentage of area protected; confidence intervals for species coverage in networks of randomly distributed protected areas; comparison between protected and unprotected sites in terms of richness of all species, threatened species, and restricted-range species; and extended acknowledgements. (PDF 339 kb)

About this article

Cite this article

Rodrigues, A., Andelman, S., Bakarr, M. et al. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428, 640–643 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02422

Download citation

  • Received: 21 December 2003

  • Accepted: 11 February 2004

  • Issue Date: 08 April 2004

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02422