Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals - PubMed
Review
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
Richard Smith. J R Soc Med. 2006 Apr.
No abstract available
Comment in
-
Carpenter RH. Carpenter RH. J R Soc Med. 2006 Aug;99(8):384-5. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900805. J R Soc Med. 2006. PMID: 16893928 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Peer review. Unreliable reviewers.
Lush B. Lush B. J R Soc Med. 2006 Aug;99(8):385. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900806. J R Soc Med. 2006. PMID: 16893932 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The multiple faces of journal peer review.
Thatje S. Thatje S. Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Mar;97(3):237-9. doi: 10.1007/s00114-010-0652-4. Naturwissenschaften. 2010. PMID: 20127306 No abstract available.
-
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Nat Med. 2011 Jan;17(1):1-2. doi: 10.1038/nm0111-1. Nat Med. 2011. PMID: 21217648 No abstract available.
-
Registered reports: prospective peer review emphasizes science over spin.
Wilkinson J, Pellicer A, Niederberger C. Wilkinson J, et al. Fertil Steril. 2019 May;111(5):831-832. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 5. Fertil Steril. 2019. PMID: 30955845 No abstract available.
-
The peer review process: a primer for JNIS readers.
Hirsch JA, Manchikanti L, Albuquerque FC, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Lev MH, Linfante I, Mocco J, Rai AT, Schaefer PW, Tarr RW. Hirsch JA, et al. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jul;9(e1):e3-e6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011781. Epub 2015 Apr 17. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017. PMID: 25888447 Review.
-
Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.
Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Gasparyan AY, et al. Rheumatol Int. 2011 Nov;31(11):1409-17. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3. Epub 2011 Jul 29. Rheumatol Int. 2011. PMID: 21800117 Review.
Cited by
-
Turoman N, Heyard R, Schwab S, Furrer E, Vergauwe E, Held L. Turoman N, et al. F1000Res. 2024 Jun 3;12:588. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.129814.3. eCollection 2023. F1000Res. 2024. PMID: 38983445 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of conceptual criticisms of homeopathy.
Schulz VM, Ücker A, Scherr C, Tournier A, Jäger T, Baumgartner S. Schulz VM, et al. Heliyon. 2023 Oct 21;9(11):e21287. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21287. eCollection 2023 Nov. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38074879 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging trends in peer review-a survey.
Walker R, Rocha da Silva P. Walker R, et al. Front Neurosci. 2015 May 27;9:169. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00169. eCollection 2015. Front Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26074753 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Communicating medicine: new ways, new audiences.
McKee M. McKee M. J R Soc Med. 2024 Jan;117(1):6-10. doi: 10.1177/01410768231220316. Epub 2024 Jan 4. J R Soc Med. 2024. PMID: 38174689 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals.
Ghasemi A, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Bahadoran Z. Ghasemi A, et al. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Dec 31;21(1):e131812. doi: 10.5812/ijem-131812. eCollection 2023 Jan. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2022. PMID: 36945344 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Lock S. A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review In Medicine. London: Nuffield Provincials Hospital Trust, 1985
-
- Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287: 2784-6 - PubMed
-
- Godlee F, Gale CR, Martyn CN. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998;280: 237-40 - PubMed
-
- Wennerås C, Wold A. Sexism and nepotism in peer-review. Nature 1997;387: 341-3 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources