pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Isolation of genetically diverse Marburg viruses from Egyptian fruit bats - PubMed

  • ️Tue Aug 19 2014

Isolation of genetically diverse Marburg viruses from Egyptian fruit bats

Jonathan S Towner et al. PLoS Pathog. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

In July and September 2007, miners working in Kitaka Cave, Uganda, were diagnosed with Marburg hemorrhagic fever. The likely source of infection in the cave was Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) based on detection of Marburg virus RNA in 31/611 (5.1%) bats, virus-specific antibody in bat sera, and isolation of genetically diverse virus from bat tissues. The virus isolates were collected nine months apart, demonstrating long-term virus circulation. The bat colony was estimated to be over 100,000 animals using mark and re-capture methods, predicting the presence of over 5,000 virus-infected bats. The genetically diverse virus genome sequences from bats and miners closely matched. These data indicate common Egyptian fruit bats can represent a major natural reservoir and source of Marburg virus with potential for spillover into humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical localization of Marburg virus antigens in Roussetus aegypticus tissues.

In the liver, viral antigens were distributed in and around hepatocytes in a dense (A) or loose (B) perimembranous pattern. Rarely, entire hepatocytes were involved (C). These infected foci were characteristically sparse and were often associated with small collections of mononuclear inflammatory cells and hepatocyte necrosis (D and E), although infected cells could also be identified without conspicuous inflammatory infiltrates. Only rare viral antigens were seen in a few mononuclear cells of the spleen of 1 bat (F). Immunoalkaline phosphatase with napthol fast-red and hematoxylin counterstain (A–C, E, F), and hematoxylin and eosin (D); original magnifications ×100 (A, B, D, E) and ×258 (C, F).

Figure 2
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of full-length or partial genomes of Marburg viruses isolated from humans or bats (see Table S1 for Genbank accession numbers).

Trees shown are maximum-likelihood analyses with Bayesian posterior probabilities >50 listed at the appropriate nodes. The ebolavirus outgroup used during the Bayesian phylogenetic analyses are denoted by the small twig at the root of the tree. Marburg virus sequences from 2007 human cases in Uganda are in green, while those from bats are listed in red. (A) Analysis of full-length genomes of five Marburg virus bat isolates, 18 historical isolates, and the isolates from patients A and B (01Uga07 and 02Uga07 respectively). (B) Phylogenetic analysis of concatenated NP and VP35 sequence fragments obtained from each bat specimen compared to corresponding regions from 48 historical isolates and those from 01Uga07 and 02Uga07.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith MW. Field aspects of the Marburg virus outbreak: 1967. Primate Supply. 1982;7:11–15.
    1. Conrad JL, Isaacson M, Smith EB, Wulff H, Crees M, et al. Epidemiologic investigation of Marburg virus disease, Southern Africa, 1975. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;27:1210–1215. - PubMed
    1. Arata AA, Johnson B, Pattyn SR. Approaches towards studies on potential reservoirs of viral haemorrhagic fever in Southern Sudan (1977) Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press; 1978. pp. 191–202.
    1. Smith DH, Johnson BK, Isaacson M, Swanepoel R, Johnson KM, et al. Marburg-virus disease in Kenya. Lancet. 1982;1:816–820. - PubMed
    1. Johnson ED, Johnson BK, Silverstein D, Tukei P, Geisbert TW, et al. Characterization of a new Marburg virus isolated from a 1987 fatal case in Kenya. Arch Virol. 1996;11:101–114. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances