Organic fraction of municipal solid waste from mechanical selection: biological stabilization and recovery options - PubMed
. 2016 Jan;23(2):1565-75.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5345-2. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
Affiliations
- PMID: 26377969
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5345-2
Organic fraction of municipal solid waste from mechanical selection: biological stabilization and recovery options
Alessandra Cesaro et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jan.
Abstract
Although current trends address towards prevention strategies, the organic fraction of municipal solid waste is greatly produced, especially in high-income contexts. Its recovery-oriented collection is a common practice, but a relevant portion of the biodegradable waste is not source selected. Mechanical and biological treatments (MBT) are the most common option to sort and stabilize the biodegradable matter ending in residual waste stream. Following the changes of the framework around waste management, this paper aimed at analyzing the quality of the mechanically selected organic waste produced in MBT plants, in order to discuss its recovery options. The material performance was obtained by its composition as well as by its main chemical and physical parameters; biological stability was also assessed by both aerobic and anaerobic methods. On this basis, the effectiveness of an aerobic biostabilization process was assessed at pilot scale. After 21 days of treatment, results proved that the biomass had reached an acceptable biostabilization level, with a potential Dynamic Respirometric Index (DRIP) value lower than the limit required for its use as daily or final landfill cover material. However, the final stabilization level was seen to be influenced by scaling factors and the 21 days of treatment turned to be not so adequate when applied in the existing full-scale facility.
Keywords: Biological stability; Impurities; Mechanical-biological treatment; Scale up; Waste management.
Similar articles
-
Colazo AB, Sánchez A, Font X, Colón J. Colazo AB, et al. Waste Manag. 2015 Sep;43:84-97. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.028. Epub 2015 Jun 26. Waste Manag. 2015. PMID: 26123979
-
Management of the biodegradable fraction of residual waste by bioreactor landfill.
Di Maria F, El-Hoz M. Di Maria F, et al. Waste Manag Res. 2020 Oct;38(10):1153-1160. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20953496. Epub 2020 Sep 10. Waste Manag Res. 2020. PMID: 32907527
-
Trulli E, Ferronato N, Torretta V, Piscitelli M, Masi S, Mancini I. Trulli E, et al. Waste Manag. 2018 Jan;71:556-564. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Oct 21. Waste Manag. 2018. PMID: 29066137
-
Bayard R, Morais Jde A, Ducom G, Achour F, Rouez M, Gourdon R. Bayard R, et al. J Hazard Mater. 2010 Mar 15;175(1-3):23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.049. Epub 2009 Oct 20. J Hazard Mater. 2010. PMID: 19913357 Review.
-
Petrovic I. Petrovic I. Waste Manag Res. 2016 Sep;34(9):840-50. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16649684. Epub 2016 May 19. Waste Manag Res. 2016. PMID: 27207770 Review.
Cited by
-
Bottausci S, Magrini C, Tuci GA, Bonoli A. Bottausci S, et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):9964-9980. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28353-8. Epub 2023 Jul 5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024. PMID: 37405605 Free PMC article.
-
Policastro G, Cesaro A. Policastro G, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 25;20(1):312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010312. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36612633 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources