Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Treated With Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors (The Mayo Clinic Experience) - PubMed
- ️Tue Jan 01 2019
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Treated With Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors (The Mayo Clinic Experience)
Ohad Oren et al. Am J Cardiol. 2019.
Abstract
Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors represent a novel addition to the lipid-lowering armamentarium. We attempted to characterize a real-world group of patients with a clinical indication for PCSK9 inhibitors and describe their clinical outcomes and adverse effect profile. A retrospective chart review was conducted, evaluating all patients referred to preventive cardiology at the Mayo Clinic (Minnesota) between September, 2015 and December, 2018 for management of severe dyslipidemia. A total of 222 patients were referred and a recommendation to start a PCSK9 inhibitor was given to 164 patients (73.9%). Of these, 28 patients (17.1%) declined the use of a PCSK9 inhibitor. A total of 136 previous authorizations were submitted. Of these applications, 96 (70.6%) were approved and 17 (12.5%) were rejected. The cohort's mean age was 64.1 years (range 39 to 91). High-intensity statins and ezetimibe were used in 50 (52.1%) and 80 (83.3%) of the treated patients. Mean pretreatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 167.9 mg/dl. At a median follow-up of 19.0 months, the mean low-density lipoprotein reduction was 60.9% (range 0 to 90.3%). Higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol percent reductions were seen in younger patients (p value 0.048), patients on high-intensity statins (p value 0.027), those with statin intolerance (p value 0.046), and individuals with a higher baseline triglycerides (p value 0.047). Two (2.1%) patients underwent coronary revascularization, and 1 (1.0%) patient was hospitalized for unstable angina. No cardiovascular deaths occurred. Adverse events were reported in 12 (12.5%) patients, and were all minor (injection site reactions, myalgias, and flu-like illness). In conclusion, our study shows an efficacy and safety profile that is concordant with previous investigations. The use of a standardized application form was associated with a high insurance approval rate.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Virani SS, Kennedy KF, Akeroyd JM, Morris PB, Bittner VA, Masoudi FA, Stone NJ, Petersen LA, Ballantyne CM. Virani SS, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 May;11(5):e004652. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004652. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018. PMID: 29748356 Free PMC article.
-
O'Keefe JH, DiNicolantonio JJ, Lavie CJ. O'Keefe JH, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 15;119(4):565-571. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 23. Am J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28081940
-
Khan SU, Talluri S, Riaz H, Rahman H, Nasir F, Bin Riaz I, Sattur S, Ahmed H, Kaluski E, Krasuski R. Khan SU, et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 May;25(8):844-853. doi: 10.1177/2047487318766612. Epub 2018 Mar 23. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29569492 Review.
-
Yadav K, Sharma M, Ferdinand KC. Yadav K, et al. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Oct;26(10):853-62. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 30. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016. PMID: 27352986 Review.
Cited by
-
Turner RM, Pirmohamed M. Turner RM, et al. J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 20;9(1):22. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010022. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31861911 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Eloso J, Awad A, Zhao X, Cunningham FE, Zhang R, Dong D, Kelley C, Glassman PA, Aspinall SL. Eloso J, et al. Am J Med Open. 2023 Feb 18;9:100035. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100035. eCollection 2023 Jun. Am J Med Open. 2023. PMID: 39035055 Free PMC article.
-
Smith A, Johnson D, Banks J, Keith SW, Karalis DG. Smith A, et al. J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 26;10(17):3828. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173828. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34501275 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous