ballotpedia.org

California Proposition 171, Replacement Property Transfer Amendment (1993)

From Ballotpedia

California Proposition 171

Flag of California.png

Election date

November 2, 1993

Topic
Property and Taxes
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Legislatively referred constitutional amendment
Origin

State legislature



California Proposition 171 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in California on November 2, 1993. It was approved.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the legislature to extend special valuation provisions to replacement structures located in different counties, meaning that a property owner can transfer the current assessed value of his original property to a replacement property in another county, but only if the county in which the property is located has agreed to participate.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the legislature to extend special valuation provisions to replacement structures located in different counties, meaning that a property owner can transfer the current assessed value of his original property to a replacement property in another county, but only if the county in which the property is located has agreed to participate.

Election results

California Proposition 171

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

2,449,504 51.70%
No 2,288,046 48.30%
Results are officially certified.
Source

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition 171 was as follows:

Property Taxation. Transfer of Base Year Value.

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

PROPERTY TAXATION. TRANSFER OF BASE YEAR VALUE. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. • Authorizes Legislature to authorize county boards of supervisors to adopt an ordinance allowing transfer of base year value of property located in another county substantially damaged or destroyed by a disaster, to replacement property located within adopting county, acquired or newly constructed within three years of substantial damage or destruction. • Specifies that scope and amount of benefits from transfer are subject to existing constitutional provisions. • Provisions applicable to replacement property acquired on or after October 20, 1991, and to determination of base year values for fiscal years 1991-92 and thereafter. Summary of Legislative Analyst's Estimate of Net State and Local Government Fiscal Impact: • If implemented, local property tax revenues could decrease by an unknown, but probably not significant, amount. • About half of any local property tax losses would be made up by additional state payments to school districts.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the California Constitution

A two-thirds vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.

See also

External links

Footnotes

Flag of California

v  e

State of California
Sacramento (capital)
Elections

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy