ballotpedia.org

Mark Miller (Wisconsin)

  • ️Tue Nov 08 2016

Mark Miller

Image of Mark Miller

Prior offices

Wisconsin State Assembly


Wisconsin State Senate District 16


Education

Contact

Mark Miller (Democratic Party) was a member of the Wisconsin State Senate, representing District 16. He assumed office in 2005. He left office on January 4, 2021.

Miller (Democratic Party) ran for re-election to the Wisconsin State Senate to represent District 16. He won in the general election on November 8, 2016.

Miller served as Senate majority leader from July 17, 2012, to 2013, and previously as Senate minority leader.[1]

Miller served in the Wisconsin State Assembly from 1998 to 2004.

Biography

Miller earned his B.S. from University of Wisconsin-Madison and graduated from Bowhay Institute for Legislative Leadership Development (BUILLD) and graduated from Flemming Fellows Leadership Institute.

Miller's professional experience includes lieutenant colonel in the Wisconsin Air National Guard, an officer and manager of Flagship, Incorporated, and a real estate property manager.

From 1996 to 2000, Miller was also on the Board of Supervisors of Dane County for District 24.[2]

Committee assignments

2019-2020

Miller was assigned to the following committees:

2017 legislative session

At the beginning of the 2017 legislative session, this legislator served on the following committees:

Wisconsin committee assignments, 2017
Agriculture, Small Business, and Tourism
Elections and Utilities
Natural Resources and Energy
Joint Legislative Audit
Joint Legislative Council

2015 legislative session

At the beginning of the 2015 legislative session, Miller served on the following committees:

Wisconsin committee assignments, 2015
Natural Resources and Energy
Elections and Local Government
Review of Administrative Rules
Joint Legislative Council

2013-2014

At the beginning of the 2013 legislative session, Miller served on the following committees:

Wisconsin committee assignments, 2013
Elections and Urban Affairs
Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform
Natural Resources
Joint Legislative Council

2011-2012

In the 2011-2012 legislative session, Miller served on the following committees:

Wisconsin committee assignments, 2011
Employment Relations
Joint Legislative Council
Legislative Organization
Senate Organization

2009-2010

In the 2009-2010 legislative session, Miller served on the following committees:

Wisconsin committee assignments, 2009
Environment, Chair
Finance, Chair
Audit
Joint Finance, Co-Chair
Audit
Employment Relations
Joint Legislative Council

Issues

Legislative walkout

Miller and the 13 other Democratic senators participated in a legislative walkout on February 17, 2011, in opposition to Assembly Bill 11 - a Republican-sponsored bill aimed at limiting collective bargaining rights, compensation and fringe benefits of public employees.[3] The Democratic departure left the Senate one vote shy of a quorum. Reports confirmed the senators fled to a hotel in Rockford, Illinois.[4] State police were dispatched by Governor Scott Walker (R) to retrieve the senators, but were unable to cross state lines.[5] The 14 state senators who left the state were described as the "Badger 14" or "Fab 14."[6]

On February 22, speaking from the basement of an Illinois hotel, Senate Minority Leader Miller provided the minority response to Gov. Scott Walker, saying, "The governor has the tools at his disposal to put this issue to an end. As soon as he is willing to take a compromise, we will go back to work in an instant." Miller stated that the legislators payed for the trip themselves, and that no taxpayer money was spent.[7]

Walker called on the Democratic senators to return to the state by March 1 in order to vote to restructure the state's debt. If they did not, he stated he may have to start cutting state jobs, saying:

"It’s not just a number, it’s not just a budget, it’s ultimately a real person with a real family, so I’m going to push that back as far as I can. We’ve got to have real numbers to balance the budget to avoid layoffs. My hope is those 14 state senators … realize that in the end, it’s much better off to avoid those cuts, it’s much better off to avoid the most dire consequences that will come if we don’t pass this bill."[8]

The Democratic senators said they would not return until the governor was willing to compromise on the budget-repair bill.

Democrats threatened with arrest

Republicans unanimously passed a resolution on March 3 finding the missing legislators in contempt and threatening them with arrest. It gave them until 4 p.m. to return or the sergeant-at-arms was ordered to take "any and all necessary steps, with or without force, and with or without the assistance of law enforcement, by warrant or other legal process, as he may deem necessary in order to bring that senator to the Senate chambers."[9]

The constitutionality of that resolution was unclear, however, as the Wisconsin Constitution only allows for the arrest of legislators while in session if they are suspected of committing a felony, treason, or breach of the peace. Jim Palmer, executive director of the Wisconsin Professional Police Association, said the resolution was an "unreasonable abuse of police power."[10]

Sen. Jon Erpenbach provided the Democratic response, stating, "All 14 of us remain in Illinois, very strong in our convictions. Issuing arrest warrants at 4 p.m. isn't going to solve the problem. This is a debate about protection of the middle class in Wisconsin; that is what the Republicans should be focusing on."[9]

The move by Republicans came the day after they issued fines of $100 a day for not showing up at the Capitol, along with taking away parking spaces.[11] The week before Republicans also passed a rule suspending direct-deposit of paychecks. Sen. Erpenbach found a way around this by granting power of attorney to two of his aides, giving them power to, among other things, pick up his paycheck. Eventually, Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald mailed the check to Erpenbach.[12]

Meeting/possible compromises

On March 7, Democratic leader Sen. Mark Miller sent a letter to the governor and senate majority leader asking for a meeting near the Wisconsin-Illinois border to restart talks on the collective bargaining issue.[13] Gov. Walker responded at a press conference, calling the letter "ridiculous," and saying that several meetings between the two sides have taken place, but that Miller has stood in the way of a compromise.[14]

Sen. Chris Larson said, "Dems will return when collective bargaining is off the table. That could be soon based on the growing public opposition to the bill and the recall efforts against Republicans."[15]

On March 8, the Governor's office released an email exchange dated March 6 between Eric Schutt, Walker's deputy chief of staff, and Democratic Senators Cullen and Jauch. The exchange discusses possible compromises on the bill, including allowing unions to bargain for wages beyond inflation rates, permitting collective-bargaining on certain economic issues, allowing public workers to collectively bargain workplace safety issues, and limiting collective bargaining agreements to 2 years or less.[16]

Senate passes bill

Seal of Wisconsin.svg.png

2011 Wisconsin Senate Recalls
Senators Facing Recall
Robert CowlesAlberta DarlingSheila HarsdorfDave HansenJim HolperinRandy HopperDan KapankeLuther OlsenRobert Wirch
Other Recall Information
Recalls by YearRecall Law in WisconsinRecall laws in other statesRecalls in Wisconsin2011 Scott Walker Budget Repair BillProtests over Budget Repair BillWisconsin Government Accountability BoardRecall timelineElection Results

On March 9, the Wisconsin State Senate approved Act 10, which included changes to the collective bargaining rights of public-sector workers. Republicans passed the bill by a vote of 18-1, with Sen. Dale Schultz (R) voting against it. Democrats, who had absented themselves in order to prevent the Senate from meeting its 20-member quorum, were not present to vote on the legislation.[17]

On May 26, 2011, Dane County Court Judge Maryann Sumi issued a stay against the law on the grounds that the legislative process had violated the state's open meetings law. The state Departments of Justice and Department of Administration appealed the decision to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. On June 14, the Wisconsin Supreme Court overruled the lower court's decision, stating it "exceeded its jurisdiction, invaded the legislature’s constitutional powers...and erred in enjoining the publication and further implementation of the act."[17]

Recall campaigns

In the wake of events surrounding the bill, both Democratic and Republican senators were targeted by active recall campaigns in 2011. Recall sponsors filed signatures on petitions targeting six Republican state senators and three Democratic state senators. Challenges were filed in all nine of those campaigns, and the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board approved the six campaigns against Republicans at meetings on May 23 and May 31, and approved the three campaigns against Democrats on June 8. Democrats held onto the 30th District seat on July 19. Republicans lost two seats in the August 9 recalls, but held onto four. Two incumbent Democrats successfully retained their seats on August 16.

Open records lawsuit

As Senate Minority Leader, Miller approved Senator Jon Erpenbach's use of private law firm Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek instead the Wisconsin Department of Justice for his taxpayer-funded legal defense against a lawsuit from the John K. MacIver Institute, a conservative Wisconsin think tank. On February 9, 2012, The MacIver Institute sued to force Erpenbach to release unredacted copies of all correspondence he had received related to Act 10 (the changes to public employee bargaining laws passed in 2011) from January 1 to March 23, 2011, after Erpenbach had responded to the Institute's initial March 24, 2011, Open Records Law request by releasing thousands of pieces of correspondence with their senders' names and other personal information removed. The MacIver Institute wanted to examine these records to determine whether any state employees violated government policies by sending communications from their government email accounts or on state time. Defending his use of a private law firm, Erpenbach cited disagreements about the case with Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen (R) and claimed that Van Hollen only upholds laws he agrees with, a claim disputed by a DOJ spokesperson. From March through October 31, 2012, the Wisconsin State Senate paid Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek $57,272, in addition to $2,194 paid to University of Wisconsin-Madison professor David Canon for research related to the case. The Senate may also be required to pay the legal expenses of the MacIver Institute if Erpenbach loses. On February 5, 2013, Grant County Circuit Judge Robert Van De Hey ruled that he would examine unredacted copies of the emails to decide if the MacIver Institute should be given access to them.[18][19]

Elections

2020

See also: Wisconsin State Senate elections, 2020

Mark Miller did not file to run for re-election.[20]

2016

See also: Wisconsin State Senate elections, 2016

Elections for the Wisconsin State Senate took place in 2016. The primary election took place on August 9, 2016, and the general election was held on November 8, 2016. The candidate filing deadline was June 1, 2016.

Incumbent Mark Miller ran unopposed in the Wisconsin State Senate District 16 general election.[21][22]

Wisconsin State Senate, District 16 General Election, 2016
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Democratic Green check mark transparent.png Mark Miller Incumbent (unopposed) 100.00% 77,047
Total Votes 77,047
Source: Wisconsin Elections Commission


Incumbent Mark Miller ran unopposed in the Wisconsin State Senate District 16 Democratic primary.[23][24]

Wisconsin State Senate, District 16 Democratic Primary, 2016
Party Candidate
    Democratic Green check mark transparent.png Mark Miller Incumbent (unopposed)

2012

See also: Wisconsin State Senate elections, 2012

Miller won re-election in the 2012 election for the Wisconsin State Senate, District 16 seat. He ran unopposed in the primary election and the general election which was November 6, 2012.[25]

Wisconsin State Senate, District 16, General Election, 2012
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Democratic Green check mark transparent.pngMark Miller Incumbent 98.7% 72,298
     - Scattering 1.3% 933
Total Votes 73,231

2011 recall

See also: Recall of Wisconsin State Senators (2011)

A local group organized to mount a recall campaign against Miller, but did not meet the required signature threshold when the group declined to merge their signatures with a Utah-based group whose integrity they questioned.[26][27][28]

2008

On November 4, 2008, Mark Miller won re-election to the Wisconsin State Senate, District 16. He ran unopposed.[29]

Mark Miller raised $67,735 for his campaign.[30]

Wisconsin State Senate, District 16 (2008)
Candidates Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Mark Miller (D) 73,672

Campaign themes

2012

Miller's website highlighted the following campaign themes:

  • Health care reform
He wants to make health care affordable and accessible. He also wants it to be a requirement for Wisconsin residents.
  • Environmental conservation
His environmental goals include preventing contaminated drinking water, reducing runoff into Wisconsin rivers and lakes, and making Wisconsin more self-sufficient and less dependent on imported energy.

The following table lists bills this person sponsored as a legislator, according to BillTrack50 and sorted by action history. Bills are sorted by the date of their last action. The following list may not be comprehensive. To see all bills this legislator sponsored, click on the legislator's name in the title of the table.

Campaign finance summary


Ballotpedia LogoNote: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Personal

Note: Please contact us if the personal information below requires an update.
Miller and his wife, Jo, have three children; Chandra, Keiko, and Sterling.[2]

Noteworthy events

Cullen leaves Democratic Caucus

On July 24, 2012, one week after Democrats gained the majority in the state Senate and Miller became Majority Leader, Tim Cullen quit the Democratic caucus because Miller did not give him chairmanship on a committee with clout. Cullen, who Miller had offered chair of the Committee on Small Business Development and Tourism called it "an insult to my district" and said he might leave the party altogether to become an independent.[31]

In a statement, Miller said, “I am disappointed in Senator Cullen and the decision he made today. Senator Cullen turned down the chairmanship of the Committee on Small Business Development and Tourism. He told me that if that was the committee offered to him, he would rather chair no committee at all. It was an important committee as small business is the economic engine for Wisconsin.”[32]

Three days later Cullen rejoined the caucus, receiving the chairmanship of two new committees and a leadership position on two others. Miller said he could have handled the situation better but welcomed Cullen back to the caucus.[33]

Scorecards

See also: State legislative scorecards and State legislative scorecards in Wisconsin

A scorecard evaluates a legislator’s voting record. Its purpose is to inform voters about the legislator’s political positions. Because scorecards have varying purposes and methodologies, each report should be considered on its own merits. For example, an advocacy group’s scorecard may assess a legislator’s voting record on one issue while a state newspaper’s scorecard may evaluate the voting record in its entirety.

Ballotpedia is in the process of developing an encyclopedic list of published scorecards. Some states have a limited number of available scorecards or scorecards produced only by select groups. It is Ballotpedia’s goal to incorporate all available scorecards regardless of ideology or number.

Click here for an overview of legislative scorecards in all 50 states. To contribute to the list of Wisconsin scorecards, email suggestions to editor@ballotpedia.org.

2020

In 2020, the Wisconsin State Legislature was in session from January 14 to May 13.

Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to labor policy.
Legislators are scored on their stances on conservation issues.
Legislators are scored on whether they voted for or against MMAC's position.
Legislators are scored on their votes by the Wisconsin Professional Police Association on legislation related to Wisconsin's law enforcement community.

2019

To view all the scorecards we found for this legislator in 2019, click [show].   

In 2019, the Wisconsin State Legislature was in session from January 7, 2019 through January 13, 2020.

Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to labor policy.
Legislators are scored on their stances on conservation issues.
Legislators are scored on whether they voted for or against MMAC's position.

2018

To view all the scorecards we found for this legislator in 2018, click [show].   

In 2018, the Wisconsin State Legislature was in session from January 16 through March 27. Special sessions were held from January 1 through February 27 and from March 15 through March 29.

Legislators are scored on whether they voted for or against MMAC's position.
Legislators are scored on their votes on small business issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to labor policy.
Legislators are scored by the Wisconsin Family Action on their votes on legislation related to "marriage, family, the sanctity of human life, or religious freedom."[34]
Legislators are scored on their stances on conservation issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on legislation WMC deemed as "most important issues for the business community."
Legislators are scored on their votes by the Wisconsin Professional Police Association on legislation related to Wisconsin's law enforcement community.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental issues.

2017

To view all the scorecards we found for this legislator in 2017, click [show].   

In 2017, the Wisconsin State Legislature was in session from January 3 through December 31. There were also special sessions. The first special session was January 5. The second special session was August 1 through September 15.

Legislators are scored on whether they voted for or against MMAC's position.
Legislators are scored on their votes on small business issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to labor policy.
Legislators are scored by the Wisconsin Family Action on their votes on legislation related to "marriage, family, the sanctity of human life, or religious freedom."[35]
Legislators are scored on their stances on conservation issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on legislation WMC deemed as "most important issues for the business community."
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental issues.

2016

To view all the scorecards we found for this legislator in 2016, click [show].   

In 2016, the Wisconsin State Legislature was in session from January 12 through March 15.

Legislators are scored on whether they voted for or against MMAC's position.
Legislators are scored on their votes on small business issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to labor policy.
Legislators are scored by the Wisconsin Family Action on their votes on legislation related to "marriage, family, the sanctity of human life, or religious freedom."[36]
Legislators are scored on their stances on conservation issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on legislation WMC deemed as "most important issues for the business community."
Legislators are scored on their votes by the Wisconsin Professional Police Association on legislation related to Wisconsin's law enforcement community.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental issues.

2015

To view all the scorecards we found for this legislator in 2015, click [show].   

In 2015, the Wisconsin State Legislature was in session from January 5 through December 31.

Legislators are scored on whether they voted for or against MMAC's position.
Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to labor policy.
Legislators are scored by the Wisconsin Family Action on their votes on legislation related to "marriage, family, the sanctity of human life, or religious freedom."[37]
Legislators are scored on their stances on conservation issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on legislation WMC deemed as "most important issues for the business community."
Legislators are scored on their votes by the Wisconsin Professional Police Association on legislation related to Wisconsin's law enforcement community.
Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental bills.

2014

To view all the scorecards we found for this legislator in 2014, click [show].   

In 2014, the Wisconsin State Legislature was in session from January 14 through June 4.

Legislators are scored on whether they voted for or against MMAC's position.
Legislators are scored on their votes on small business issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to labor policy.
Legislators are scored on their stances on conservation issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on legislation WMC deemed as "most important issues for the business community."
Legislators are scored on their votes by the Wisconsin Professional Police Association on legislation related to Wisconsin's law enforcement community.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental issues.

2013

To view all the scorecards we found for this legislator in 2013, click [show].   

In 2013, the Wisconsin State Legislature was in session from January 7 to December 31.

Legislators are scored on whether they voted for or against MMAC's position.
Legislators are scored on their votes on small business issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to labor policy.
Legislators are scored on their stances on conservation issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on legislation WMC deemed as "most important issues for the business community."
Legislators are scored on their votes by the Wisconsin Professional Police Association on legislation related to Wisconsin's law enforcement community.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental issues.

2012

To view all the scorecards we found for this legislator in 2012, click [show].   

In 2012, the Wisconsin State Legislature was in session from January 10 through March 16.

Legislators are scored on whether they voted for or against NPCW's position.
Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to labor policy.
Legislators are scored on their stances on conservation issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on legislation WMC deemed as "most important issues for the business community."
Legislators are scored on their votes by the Wisconsin Professional Police Association on legislation related to Wisconsin's law enforcement community.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental issues.

Recent news

This section displays the most recent stories in a Google News search for the term "Mark + Miller + Wisconsin + Senate"

All stories may not be relevant to this legislator due to the nature of the search engine.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. Wisconsin Radio Network, "Senate leadership transferred to Democrats," July 17, 2012
  2. 2.0 2.1 Project Vote Smart, "Biography," accessed May 5, 2014
  3. Wisconsin.gov, "ASSEMBLY BILL 11," accessed February 17, 2011
  4. Green Bay Press Gazette, "Wisconsin Democrats flee to Clock Tower Hotel in Rockford, Ill., to block anti-union bill," February 17, 2011
  5. Bloomberg Businessweek, "Senator: Missing Wis. lawmakers left the state," February 17, 2011
  6. Facebook, "Fab 14," accessed May 5, 2014
  7. WISN, "State Sen. Minority Leader Responds to Walker," February 22, 2010
  8. Christian Science Monitor, "Wisconsin governor to missing senators: Come back or I'll lay off 1,500," February 28, 2011
  9. 9.0 9.1 Wall Street Journal, "Pressure Mounts on Absent Democrats in Wisconsin, Indiana," March 3, 2011
  10. Wisconsin State Journal, "Senate orders arrest of missing Democrats," March 3, 2011
  11. My Fox Chicago, "Wisconsin GOP Slaps Missing Dems With $100 Daily Fines," March 2, 2011 (dead link)
  12. Talking Points Memo, "AWOL Wisconsin Dem Beats The System, Gets His Paycheck Mailed To Him," March 3, 2011
  13. New York Times, "Wisconsin Democrats Urge New Talks on Labor Bill," March 7, 2011
  14. CNN, "Wisconsin gov: Democratic senator's border meeting idea 'ridiculous'," March 7, 2011
  15. Talking Points Memo, "Wisconsin Dems Deny WSJ Report Of Imminent Return," March 6, 2011
  16. CNN, "E-mails: Wisconsin governor offers concessions on budget bill," March 8, 2011
  17. 17.0 17.1 Wisconsin State Journal, "Front pages from historic Scott Walker protests," February 11, 2016
  18. Mary Spicuzza, Wisconsin State Journal, "Taxpayers foot bill for Erpenbach's legal costs in open records case," February 5, 2013
  19. Patrick Marley, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, February 5, 2013
  20. WKOW, "Rep. Sargent announces run for state Senate," January 22, 2020
  21. Wisconsin Government Accountability Board, "Candidates on Ballot by Election - 2016 General Election - 11/8/2016," accessed November 4, 2016
  22. Wisconsin Elections Commission, "2016 Fall General Election Results," accessed December 2, 2016
  23. Wisconsin Government Accountability Board, "Candidate Tracking by Office," accessed June 20, 2016
  24. Wisconsin Elections and Ethics Commissions, "2016 Partisan Primary," accessed September 16, 2016
  25. Wisconsin Government Accountability Board, "2012 Candidate List," accessed May 5, 2014 (dead link)
  26. "Recall Mark Miller" website
  27. AOL News, "Wisconsin Election Recall Reality Check," February 23, 2011
  28. Wisconsin State Journal, "Merged signatures plan dropped, so recall effort against Sen. Miller ends," April 29, 2011
  29. Government Accountability Board, "Wisconsin State Election Results," accessed May 5, 2014
  30. Follow the Money, "2008 contributions," accessed May 5, 2014
  31. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, "Cullen quits Senate Democratic caucus," July 24, 2012
  32. NBC 15, "Sen. Cullen Leaves Democratic Caucus," July 24, 2012
  33. Wisconsin State Journal, "Cullen rejoins Democratic caucus after getting committee chairmanships," July 27, 2012
  34. Wisconsin Family Action, "2015-2016 legislative scorecard," accessed May 31, 2017
  35. Wisconsin Family Action, "2015-2016 legislative scorecard," accessed May 31, 2017
  36. Wisconsin Family Action, "2015-2016 legislative scorecard," accessed May 31, 2017
  37. Wisconsin Family Action, "2015-2016 legislative scorecard," accessed May 31, 2017
Political offices
Preceded by
'
Wisconsin State Senate District 16
2004–2021
Succeeded by
Melissa Sargent (D)

Leadership

Senate President:Mary Felzkowski

Majority Leader:Devin LeMahieu

Minority Leader:Dianne Hesselbein

Senators

Republican Party (18)

Democratic Party (15)

Flag of Wisconsin

v  e

State of Wisconsin
Madison (capital)
Elections

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy