User talk:Esrever - Wikimedia Commons
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
|
This is Esrever's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Esrever. |
|---|
|
Thank you. Regards. --Dodo 09:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You may now begin reviewing. Please review the relevant instructions at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}, and add {{User trusted}} to your userpage. Cheers, — Giggy 00:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey. My response was a bit late here, obviously, because the template was removed by Arria Belli (talk · contribs). For the record, I would have done/suggested you do the same thing - if OTRS comes in, just remove all flickr templates, and the bot will leave the image alone. — Giggy 22:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You're welcome! Because I'm such a nice guy I took a look at some of your flickr reviews - at the moment they seem OK. Thanks for helping out with the backlog - heck, I should be doing more than I am (I'm barely helping out with admin stuff too) :P Cheers, — Giggy 06:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I had purposelly removed the other people from the Image:RupertEverett.jpg picture, so it was only Everett left. I've done this in all of my uploads, but right before your flickrereview User:Estrilda uploaded the whole picture, when there's really no use of it. what do you think of me reverting this? --Yamanbaiia 00:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Exactly, i always crop them so in the article there's only one person. I don't know how to do that other version thing, but thanks for the feedback, i'll try and find out how to do that later. ---Yamanbaiia 15:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- :') Thank you! i wish i'd known this sooner! Thank you, thank you, thank you. ---Yamanbaiia 18:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Esrever. Their have already delete that image. Now I upload it again with different name and license. U can see it if are acceptable, if not u can give me further instruction, how to upload an image in good terms. Cheers.--Muddyb Blast Producer 06:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Esrever. Could you please delete this image?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Edit_box_foe_example.JPG
I have absolutely nothing to with that image. You can delete it please...--Muddyb Blast Producer 15:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the hints. Things are done! Cheers...--Muddyb Blast Producer 10:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.
This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.
To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Esrever, I'm the user who uploaded both the images. You're right tagging it as requested for deletion, but now I've specified in the description of each photo that the first is a XIX century photo, and the second was shooted in 1915. For this reason, we can assume that, according also with the Italian copyright law, both are in the Public Domain. I'm not a skilled user, but if you can add the specification for PD licence I think it'll be good.
Regards, --Fradeve11 (talk) 07:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi!
Please check whether my edits to this picture were an obvious improvement. If so, feel free to revert the reversion by another editor. --Slashme (talk) 14:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dear user, the MediaWiki developers recently announced that the "Image:" namespace is going to be renamed to "File:". "Image:" will remain an alias. The canonical namespace name wgCanonicalNamespace will change from "Image" to "File".
I noticed that you use wgCanonicalNamespace in either your monobook.js page or a JavaScript file in your userspace (check this list).
Please check and replace all occurrences of
wgCanonicalNamespace == "Image"
with
wgNamespaceNumber == 6
to ensure that your scripts keep working. Thanks! --Dschwen (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I was wondering if you had a copy of the original e-mail in which permission was granted to use the image. If you do, could you please forward it to OTRS? Thanks, Scorpion0422 (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
--Rama (talk) 20:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Esrever. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]