The Problem of Other Minds
- ️Tue Nov 24 2009
Abstrct
The problem of other minds is a problem of modern philosophy that can be traced back to the French seventeenth century philosopher René Descartes. Descartes held the dualistic view that, apart from God, there are two kinds of things (or “substances”) in the world: “extended things” and “thinking things”. He thought, in particular, that a human being is a union of an extended thing (a body) and a thinking thing (a mind). He recognized that, given such a view, an account has to be given of how these two fundamentally different things are united, and in particular, how there can be causal interaction between them. But Descartes does not seem to have fully realized that another sort of issue needs to be addressed as well. Consider the following passage from Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy: if I look out the window and see men crossing the square, as I just happen to have done, I normally say that I see the men themselves […]. Yet do I see more than hats and coats which would conceal automatons? I judge that they are men. (Descartes 1984, 21)
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Other advocates of theory-theory favor an account in terms of innate theory-of-mind “modules” (for discussion, see Gopnik 1996).
- 2.
For a more detailed discussion of theory of mind, see Gallagher and Zahavi 2007, chapter 9.
- 3.
The neutral monists’ (very implausible) further reductive step may be ignored here.
- 4.
In a recent paper on the history of psychology, Alan Costall argues that both the “introspectionism” usually believed to have preceded behaviorism as the dominant trend in psychology and Watsonian behaviorism “were arguing from the same premise, the antithesis of behaviour, on the one hand, and mind and consciousness on the other. Both were committed to an overly subjectivized conception of subjectivity, and an overly objectivized conception of behaviour” (Costall 2006, 649). Interestingly, Costall also argues that the current “cognitivist” paradigm, contra its own self-image, has not abandoned this Cartesian picture. The theory-of-mind debate would seem to support this claim (cf. Leudar and Costall 2004).
- 5.
For a contemporary version of the argument, see Noë 2004.
- 6.
The best explanation argument and at least some versions of theory-theory work with a similar symmetry: mental states as such (whether mine or someone else’s) are unobservable theoretical entities.
- 7.
For discussion of these points, see Overgaard 2007, chapters 5 and 7.
- 8.
Earlier versions of this chapter were presented at the fifth annual meeting of the Nordic Society for Phenomenology, University of Copenhagen, in April 2007, and at the second workshop of the Research Network on the Philosophy of Mind, University of Hull, in July 2007. I am grateful to both audiences for helpful discussion and to Shaun Gallagher for comments on the penultimate draft of the chapter.
References
Avramides A (2001) Other minds. Routledge, London
Ayer AJ (1990) Language, truth and logic. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth
Carruthers P (1991) Introducing Persons. Routledge, London
Churchland PM (1988) Matter and consciousness, Revised edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Costall A (2006) Introspectionism and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Conscious Cogn 15:634-654
Dennett DC (1971) Intentional systems. J Philos 68:87-106
Descartes R (1984) Meditations on first philosophy (trans: Cottingham J). In: The philosophical writings of Descartes, vol II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3-62
Gallagher S, Zahavi D (2007) The phenomenological mind. Routledge, London
Gallese V, Goldman AI (1998) Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn Sci 2:493-501
Goldman AI (2000) Folk psychology and mental concepts. Protosociology 14:4-25
Gopnik A (1993) How we know our minds: the illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality. Behav Brain Sci 16:1-14
Gopnik A (1996) Theories and modules; creation myths, developmental realities, and neurath’s boat. In: Carruthers P, Smith PK (eds) Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 169-183
Gordon RM (1996) Radical simulationism. In: Carruthers P, Smith PK (eds) Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11-21
Hobson RP (1991) Against the theory of ‘theory of mind’. Br J Dev Psychol 9:33-51
Hull CL (1943) Principles of behavior: an introduction to behavior theory. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Husserl E (1989) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: second book (trans: Rojcewicz R, Schuwer A). Kluwer, Dordrecht
Husserl E (1995) Cartesian meditations: an introduction to phenomenology (trans: Cairns D). Kluwer, Dordrecht
Hyslop A (1995) Other minds. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Leslie AM (1987) Children’s understanding of the mental world. In: Gregory RL (ed) The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 139-142
Leudar I, Costall A (2004) On the persistence of the ‘problem of other minds’ in psychology. Theory Psychol 14:601-621
Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith C). Routledge, London
Mill JS (1979) In: Robson JM (ed) An examination of Sir William Hamilton’s philosophy: collected works, vol IX. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Noë A (2004) Action in perception. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Overgaard S (2007) Wittgenstein and other minds. Routledge, New York
Overgaard S, Zahavi D (2009) Understanding (other) minds: Wittgenstein’s phenomenological contribution. In: Levy D, Zamuner E (eds) Wittgenstein’s enduring arguments. Routledge, London, pp 60-80
Russell B (1949) The analysis of mind. Allen & Unwin, London
Ryle G (2000) The concept of mind. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth
Sartre J-P (1989) Being and nothingness: an essay on phenomenological ontology (trans: Barnes HE). Routledge, London
Scheler M (1954) The nature of sympathy (trans: Heath P). Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Searle J (1983) Intentionality: an essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wittgenstein L (1963) Philosophical investigations (trans: Anscombe GEM). Blackwell, Oxford
Wittgenstein L (1967) In: Anscombe GEM, von Wright GH (eds) Zettel (trans: Anscombe GEM). University of California Press, Berkeley
Wittgenstein L (1980) In: von Wright GH, Nyman H (eds) Remarks on the philosophy of psychology, vol II (trans: Luckhardt CG, Aue MAE). Blackwell, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade, 140-142, DK-2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark
Søren Overgaard
Philosophy Department, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom
Søren Overgaard
Authors
- Søren Overgaard
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
FB Philosophie und Philologie, Universität Mainz, Jakob Welder-Weg 18, Mainz, 55128, Germany
Daniel Schmicking
Dept of Philosophy & Cognitive Sciences, University of Central Florida, Colbourn Hall 411, Orlando, 32816-1352, U.S.A.
Shaun Gallagher
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Overgaard, S. (2010). The Problem of Other Minds. In: Schmicking, D., Gallagher, S. (eds) Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_14
Published: 24 November 2009
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2645-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2646-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)