link.springer.com

The Symbolic Benefits of Descriptive and Substantive Representation - Political Behavior

  • ️Hibbing, Matthew V.
  • ️Fri May 13 2016

References

  • Abney, F. G., & Hutcheson, J. D. (1981). Race, representation, and trust: Changes in attitudes after the election of a black mayor. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(1), 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson, L. R. (2003). Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1040–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson, L. R., & Carrillo, N. (2007). More is better: The influence of collective female descriptive representation on external efficacy. Politics and Gender, 3(1), 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A., & Cook, C. (2005). Representing black interests and promoting black culture: The importance of African American descriptive representation in the US House. Du Bois Review, 2(02), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banducci, S. A., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Minority representation, empowerment, and participation. Journal of Politics, 66(2), 534–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T. D. & Burchard, S. M. (2012). Engendering politics the impact of descriptive representation on womens political engagement in sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 0010414012463884.

  • Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L., & Gilliam, F. D, Jr. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and black empowerment. The American Political Science Review, 84, 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C., Epstein, D., & O’Halloran, S. (1996). Do majority-minority districts maximize substantive black representation in congress? American Political Science Review, 90, 794–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. E., & Wolbrecht, C. (2006). See Jane run: Women politicians as role models for adolescents. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casellas, J. P., & Wallace, S. J. (2015). The role of race, ethnicity, and party on attitudes toward descriptive representation. American Politics Research, 43, 144–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerulo, K. A. (1993). Symbols and the world system: National anthems and flags. Sociological Forum, 8(2), 243–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. C. (1995). Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desposato, S., & Norrander, B. (2009). The gender gap in Latin America: Contextual and individual influences on gender and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 39(01), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. S. (1978). Constituency opinion and congressional behavior: A reexamination of the Miller-Stokes representation data. American Journal of Political Science, 511–535.

  • Gay, C. (2001). The effect of black congressional representation on political participation. American Political Science Review, 95, 589–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, C. (2002). Spirals of trust? The effect of descriptive representation on the relationship between citizens and their government. American Journal of Political Science, 717–732.

  • Grose, C. R. (2011). Congress in black and white. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guinier, L. (1995). The tyranny of the majority: Fundamental fairness in representative democracy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S. B. (1997). Talking about politics: Gender and contextual effects on political proselytizing. The Journal of Politics, 59(01), 73–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hero, R. E. & Tolbert, C. J. (1995). Latinos and substantive representation in the US House of Representatives: Direct, indirect, or nonexistent? American Journal of Political Science, 640–652.

  • Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J. (1997). Candidate gender and women’s psychological engagement in politics. American Politics Quarterly, 25(1), 118–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, J. H. (1978). Representativeness and elections: A policy analysis. The American Political Science Review, 165–177.

  • Lawless, J. L. (2004). Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1), 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2014). The symbolic representation of gender: A discursive approach. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent yes. The Journal of Politics, 61(03), 628–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrone, D. J. & Kuklinski, J. H. (1979). The delegate theory of representation. American Journal of Political Science, 278–300.

  • Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. The American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overby, L. M., Brown, R. D., Bruce, J. M., Smith, C. E, Jr., & Winkle, J. W, III. (2005). Race, political empowerment, and minority perceptions of judicial fairness. Social Science Quarterly, 86(2), 444–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, B. I., Shapiro, R. Y., Gronke, P. W., & Rosenberg, R. M. (1984). Constituency, party, and representation in Congress. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(4), 741–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantoja, A. D., & Segura, G. M. (2003). Does ethnicity matter? Descriptive representation in legislatures and political alienation among latinos. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, R. R., Tolbert, C. J., Bowen, D. C., & Clark, C. J. (2010). Race and turnout: Does descriptive representation in state legislatures increase minority voting? Political Research Quarterly, 63(4), 890–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, N., & Curry, B. (2010). Does descriptive race representation enhance institutional legitimacy? The case of the US courts. Journal of Politics, 72, 90–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2010). Political power and womens representation in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwindt-Bayer, L. A., & Mishler, W. (2005). An integrated model of women’s representation. Journal of Politics, 67(2), 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, K. (2001). The political representation of blacks in Congress: Does race matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 623–638.

  • Tate, K. (2003). Black faces in the mirror: African Americans and their representatives in the US Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., Walker, L., et al. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven: Yale University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice-criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulbig, S. G. (2007). Gendering municipal government: Female descriptive representation and feelings of political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 88(5), 1106–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, R. (1978). Collective vs. dyadic representation in Congress. The American Political Science Review, 535–547.

Download references