Alexander Scriabin as a Russian Cosmist - Studies in East European Thought

1. In this regard, it might be worth mentioning that Vladimir Solovyov, whom George M. Young describes as the “great philosopher who inspired Russia’s ‘Silver Age’ of literature and art” (see Young 2012, p. 10), was a vocal critic of positivism. It is perhaps revealing that the subtitle of his 1874 book, The Crisis of Western Philosophy, is Against the Positivists. I mention Solovyov here because his name will frequently appear in this paper.

2. Throughout this paper, the word “flight” is used to refer to such an intention of ascent.

3. For clarification: by “technology” I specifically mean “scientific technology.” In a broader sense, even the piano, for which most of Scriabin’s compositions were written, can be viewed as an advanced technology he employed to realize his ideas. However, any technology Scriabin used or considered using was in service of an artistic vision, not a scientific one.

4. A notable exception is Nikolai Berdyaev, who, in George M. Young’s words, “believed that any philosophical roadmap proposed would limit rather than encourage freedom. He did not want his thoughts ever to harden into a new dogma, a new closed system, or any intellectual equivalent of death” (Young 2012, p. 137). Berdyaev was the most existential figure in Russian Cosmism, and I believe his refusal to offer his audience a philosophical roadmap was thanks to the influence of existentialist philosophy on him.

5. It is important to note that, as with many aspects of Russian Cosmism, such distinctions are not absolute. One might simply divide the movement into two categories: natural-scientific and religious-philosophical (see Gacheva 2019, p. 3). However, given this paper’s particular focus on Scriabin’s work, it accepts the “artist” category for its contextual relevance.

6. As mentioned in this paper, “Russian Cosmism” is a term retrospectively used by scholars in the latter half of the twentieth century to categorize figures with certain shared traits. Unlike Theosophy, a self-conscious movement, whose members identified as part of it, Russian Cosmism was not recognized as a distinct movement at the time. Pointing out this distinction is crucial to prevent readers from equating Russian Cosmism’s status with that of an established religious movement, such as Theosophy. When I say “art and artists held a significant position in the Russian Cosmism,” I mean that, upon retrospective analysis, an aesthetic sensibility can be detected in figures associated with Russian Cosmism.

7. For clarity’s sake, it is worth emphasizing my consistent usage of “Silver Age” and “Russian Cosmism” throughout this paper. While the Silver Age signifies a broader cultural spectrum of the era under discussion, the Russian Cosmism represents a distinct facet within the Silver Age, characterized by more specific traits. To elucidate further, every Russian Cosmist referenced in this paper is situated within the Silver Age (or is regarded as a pivotal inspiration for that era); however, not every figure of the Silver Age can be classified as a Russian Cosmist. For example, although I recognize Dmitry Merezhkovsky and Konstantin Balmont as figures of the Silver Age, I would not classify them as Russian Cosmists.

8. It is essential to emphasize that the Soviets’ political motivations and agendas are not being dismissed by the author of this paper. My focus is on the spiritual undertone that culminated in the realization of a deeply-rooted vision. This is not to say that every individual involved in the Sputnik programme shared the spiritual goals of the early Russian Cosmists or self-identified as a Cosmist. Rather, it suggests that the aspirations of Russian Cosmists influenced the national psyche in such a way that it culminated in the launch of Sputnik. It is a well-known fact that Fyodorov’s protégé, Tsiolkovsky, did build wooden model rockets and “wrote the papers that would eventually lay the foundation for the 1957 launching of Sputnik I” (see Young 2012, p. 149). Here, I am setting aside any speculative science fiction of the West. Unlike Russian Cosmists, writers like Jules Verne and H.G. Wells, as far as I am aware, never conveyed any sense of urgency by calling an entire nation to action; in other words, they did not move beyond mere fascination. It is important to underscore that Russian Cosmism is not synonymous with science fiction, and its proponents were actively working to make their visions a reality.

9. In this context, I am reminded of Schumann, who also set his own poems to music. While his poetry, when compared to the works of Heine and Goethe, may not be deemed ingenious, labeling his poems as “bad poetry” entirely misses the point. The poems should be evaluated based on their impact within the appropriate context—which, in Schumann’s case, means in combination with music to evoke a specific emotional response in the listener.

• Aleshin, Albert Ivanovich 2022. Razmyshlenie o Fenomene Russkogo Kosmizma. In Russkiy Kosmizm, N. F. Fedorov, K. E. Tsiolkovskiy, V. I. Vernadskiy, A. L. Chizhevskiy, eds. A. G. Gachevoy, B. I. Pruzhinina, and T. G. Shchedrinoi. Moskva: ROSSPEN.

  Google Scholar 

• Armengaud, Jean-Pierre. 2017. Mental disorder and creativity in composers: The performer’s gesture as a pointer to traces of ‘madness’. In Mental illnesses in symbolism, ed. Rosina Neginsky. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  Google Scholar 

• Ballard, Lincoln. 2012. A Russian mystic in the age of aquarius: The U.S. revival of Alexander Scriabin in the 1960s. American Music 30(2): 194–227.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ballard, Lincoln, and Matthew Bengtson. 2017. The Alexander Scriabin companion: History, performance, and lore. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

  Google Scholar 

• Berdyaev, Nicolas. 1948. The Russian idea. New York: Macmillan Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Berdyaev, Nicolas. 1962. The meaning of the creative act. New York: Collier Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Bezgodov, Aleksandr, and Konstantin Barezhev. 2019. The origins of planetary ethics in the philosophy of Russian cosmism. Xlibris.

  Google Scholar 

• Bowers, Faubion. 1996. Scriabin: A biography, vol. II. Mineola: Dover.

  Google Scholar 

• Bowers, Faubion. 1973. Scriabin, mascot of the cosmonauts. High Fidelity. June.

• Bychkov, Victor V., and Oleg V. Bychkov. 2020. Russian religious aesthetics in the first half of the twentieth century. In The Oxford handbook of Russian religious thought, eds. Caryl Emerson, George Pattison, and Randall A. Poole. London: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Cooper, Martin. 1935. Scriabin’s mystical beliefs. Music and Letters 16(2): 110–115.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• de Schloezer, Boris. 1987. Scriabin: Artist and mystic. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• de Schloezer, Boris. 2018. A note by Boris de Schloezer on the preliminary action. In The notebooks of Alexander Skryabin, ed. Simon Nicholls. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Dimova, Polina. 2013. The apocalyptic dispersion of light into poetry and music: Aleksandr skrjabin in the Russian religious imagination. In Shapes of apocalypse: Arts and philosophy in slavic thought, ed. Andrea Oppo. Boston: Academic Studies Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Evtuhov, Catherine. 1997. The cross and the sickle sergei bulgakov and the fate of Russian religious philosophy, 1890–1920. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Fedorov, Nikolai. 1990. What was man created for? The philosophy of the common task. Lausanne: Honeyglen Publishing/L’Age d’Homme.

  Google Scholar 

• Florensky, Pavel Aleksandrovich. 1993. Ikonostas: Izbrannye Trudy Po Iskusstvu. Sankt-Peterburg: Mifril; Russkaya kniga.

  Google Scholar 

• Florovsky, Georges. 1979. Collected works of georges florovsky, vol. VI: Ways of Russian theology, part II. ed. Richard S. Haugh. Belmont: Nordland Publishing Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Frank, Semyon Lyudvigovich. 1950. Introduction. In A solovyov anthology, London: SCM Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Fyodorov, Nikolay Fyodorovich. 1995a. Sobranie Sochineniy v Chetyryokh Tomakh, Tom I. Moskva: Progress.

  Google Scholar 

• Fyodorov, Nikolay Fyodorovich. 1995b. Sobranie Sochineniy v Chetyryokh Tomakh, Tom II. Moskva: Progress.

  Google Scholar 

• Fyodorov, Nikolay Fyodorovich. 1997. Sobranie Sochineniy v Chetyryokh Tomakh, Tom III. Moskva: Traditsiya.

  Google Scholar 

• Gacheva, Anastasiya Georgievna 2010. Filosofiya Otechestvennogo Kosmizma: Obraz Mira, Cheloveka, Istorii. In Russkiy Kosmizm: Proshloe, Nastoyashchee i Budushchee, ed. Galina Fyodorovna Nazarova. Oryol: Izdatel’stvo OOO ‘Modul-K’.

  Google Scholar 

• Gacheva, Anastasiya 2019. Russkiy Kosmizm v Ideyakh i Litsakh. Moskva: Akademicheskiy proekt.

  Google Scholar 

• Garcia, Susanna. 2000. Scriabin’s symbolist plot archetype in the late piano sonatas. 19th-Century Music 23(3): 273–300.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gilman, Lawrence. 1922. Music of the month: A mystical tone-poet. The North American Review 215(799): 838–843.

  Google Scholar 

• Girenok, Fyodor 1998. PatoLogiya Russkogo Uma. Moskva: Agraf.

  Google Scholar 

• Grande, Antonio. 2022. Temporal perspectives in Scriabin’s late music. In Demystifying Scriabin, eds. Vasilis Kallis and Kenneth Smith. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Grier, Philip T. 2015. The Russian idea and the West. In Russia and Western civilization: Cutural and historical encounters, ed. Russell Bova. London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Groys, Boris. 2017. Cosmic anxiety: The Russian case. In Supercommunity: Diabolical togetherness beyond contemporary art, eds. Julieta Aranda, Brian Kuan Wood, and Anton Vidokle. London: Verso.

  Google Scholar 

• Groys, Boris. 2018. Introduction: Russian cosmism and the technology of immortality. In Russian cosmism, ed. Boris Groys. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Hagemeister, Michael. 1997. Russian cosmism in the 1920s and today. In The occult in Russian and Soviet culture, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Holden, Scott. 2012. Finding the essence of late Scriabin in his Tenth Sonata. In The pianist’s craft: Mastering the works of great composers, Plymouth: Scarecrow Press

  Google Scholar 

• Hull, Arthur Eaglefield. 1916. A great Russian tone-poet: Scriabin. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Ivanov, Viacheslav. 2001. Selected essays. ed. Michael Wachtel. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ivanov, Vjačeslav Ivanovič. 2010. Subjekt a kosmos. Olomouc: Refugium Velehrad-Roma.

  Google Scholar 

• Ivanov, Vyacheslav. 2015. In my beginning is my end: Traditional values in Russian social life and thought. In Remaking Russia: Voices from within, London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Klyuchnikova (Lobankova), Ekaterina Vladimirovna. 2013. A. N. Skryabin i Natsional’nyy Disput Nachala XX v.: Konteksty i Podteksty Russkogo Messianstva. In Filosofiya. Literatura. Iskusstvo: Andrey Belyy—Vyacheslav Ivanov—Aleksandr Skryabin, ed. Konstantin Glebovich Isupov. Moskva: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN).

  Google Scholar 

• Laruelle, Marlene. 2019. Russian nationalism: Imaginaries, doctrines, and political battlefields. London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Leikin, Anatole. 2011. The performing style of Alexander Scriabin. Farnham: Ashgate.

  Google Scholar 

• Liseev, Igor’ Konstantinovich, and Ogurtsov, Aleksandr Pavlovich. 2022. Russkiy Kosmizm i Sovremennost’. In Russkiy Kosmizm: N. F. Fedorov, K. E. Tsiolkovskiy, V. I. Vernadskiy, A. L. Chizhevskiy, eds. A. G. Gachevoy, B. I. Pruzhinina, and T. G. Shchedrinoi. Moskva: ROSSPEN.

  Google Scholar 

• Lobanova, Marina Nikolaevna. 2013. ‘Ekstaz i Bezumie’: Osobennosti Dionisiyskogo Mirovospriyatiya A. N. Skryabina. In Filosofiya. Literatura. Iskusstvo: Andrey Belyy—Vyacheslav Ivanov—Aleksandr Skryabin, ed. Konstantin Glebovich Isupov. Moskva: Rossiyskaya Politicheskaya Entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN).

  Google Scholar 

• MacDonald, Hugh. 1972. Words and music by A. Skryabin. Music. Times 113(1547): 22–25.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Marvick, Louis W. 1986. Two versions of the symbolist apocalypse: Mallarmé’s livre and Scriabin’s mysterium. Crit. 28(3): 287–306.

  Google Scholar 

• Marvick, Louis. 2004. Waking the face that no one is: A study in the musical context of symbolist poetics. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Matlaw, Ralph E. 1979. Scriabin and Russian symbolism. Comp. Lit. 31(1): 1–23.

  Google Scholar 

• Mitchell, Rebecca. 2015. Nietzsche’s orphans: Music, metaphysics, and the twilight of the Russian empire. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Mitchell, Rebecca. 2020. ‘Musical metaphysics’ in late imperial Russia. In The Oxford handbook of Russian religious thought, eds. Caryl Emerson, George Pattison, and Randall A. Poole, 379–395. London: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Morrison, Simon A. 2019. Russian opera and the symbolist movement. Oakland: University of California Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2007a. The dionysiac world view. In The birth of tragedy and other writings, eds. Raymond Geuss and Ronald Speirs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2007b. Thus spoke Zarathustra. eds. Robert Pippin and Adrian del Caro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Payne, Robert. 1995. Introduction. In Mayakovsky: Plays, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Plotinus. 2018. The Enneads. ed. Lloyd P. Gerson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Poole, Randall A. 2020. Slavophilism and the origins of Russian religious philosophy. In The Oxford handbook of Russian religious thought, eds. Caryl Emerson, George Pattison, and Randall A. Poole. London: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Pyman, Avril. 1996. A history of Russian symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Roseberry, Eric. 1982. Shostakovich: His life and times. New York: Hippocrene Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Rosenfeld, Paul. 1920. Musical portraits. New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Rybakov, S. V., V. A. Fetisov, and D. F. Aliev. 2023. Manifest Garmonichnogo Razvitiya. Moskva: Prometey.

  Google Scholar 

• Sabaneev, Leonid Pavlovich. 2000. Vospominaniya o Skryabine. Moskva: Klassika-XXI.

  Google Scholar 

• Sabaneev, Leonid. 2005. Erinnerungen an Alexander Skrjabin, Berlin: Verlag Ernst Kuhn.

  Google Scholar 

• Schopenhauer, Arthur. 2010. The world as will and representation, vol. I. ed. Christopher Janaway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Semyonova, Svetlana Grigoryevna. 1993. Russkiy Kosmizm. In Russkiy Kosmizm: Antologiya Filosofskoy Mysli, eds. Svetlana Grigoryevna Semenova and Anastasiya Georgievna Ganeva. Moskva: Pedagogika-Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Shaw-Miller, Simon. 2002. Visible deeds of music: Art and music from Wagner to Cage. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Skryabin, Alexander. 2018. The notebooks of Alexander Skryabin. ed. Simon Nicholls. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Slonimsky, Nicolas. 2006. Writings on music: Russian and Soviet music and composers, New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Smirnova, Elena Valeryanovna. 2013. Filosofskie Opyty A. N. Skryabina. In Filosofiya. Literatura. Iskusstvo: Andrey Belyy—Vyacheslav Ivanov—Aleksandr Skryabin, ed. Konstantin Glebovich Isupov. Moskva: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN).

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, Kenneth M. 2020. Desire in chromatic harmony: A psychodynamic exploration of fin de siècle tonality. London: Oxford University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Smith, Kenneth. 2022. Scriabin’s multi-dimensional accelerative Sonata forms. In Demystifying Scriabin, eds. Vasilis Kallis and Kenneth Smith. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Solovyov, Vladimir. 1950. A solovyov anthology. ed. Semyon Lyudvigovich Frank. London: SCM Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Spinoza, Baruch. 2002. Spinoza: The complete works. ed. Michael L. Morgan Indianapolis. Cambridge: Hackett Publ. Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Starcevic, Vladan. 2012. The life and music of Alexander Scriabin: Megalomania revisited. Australas. Psychiatry 20(1): 57–60.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stravinsky, Igor. 1960. Poetics of music in the form of six lessons. New York: Vintage.

  Google Scholar 

• Taruskin, Richard. 1997. Defining Russia musically: Historical and hermeneutical essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Tchinaev, Vladimir P. 2019. Russian cosmism in the search of the absolute: Parallels and interconnections in music, poetry and art in the 1910–20s. J. Moscow Conserv. 10(4): 70–97.

  Google Scholar 

• Tsiolkovsky, Konstantin Eduardovich. 2004. Kosmicheskaya Filosofiya. Moskva: Sfera.

  Google Scholar 

• Voskresenskaya, Marina Arkad’evna 2005. Simvolizm Kak Mirovidenie Serebryanogo Veka: Sotsio-Kul’turnye Faktory Formirovaniya Obshchestvennogo Soznaniya Rossiyskoy Kul’turnoy Elity Rubezha XIX—XX Vekov. Moskva: Logos.

• Young, George M. 2012. The Russian cosmists: The esoteric futurism of nikolai fedorov and his followers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Musicology, Palacký University Olomouc, Univerzitní 3, 779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic

   Ali Yansori

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Yansori.

Competing Interests

I hereby confirm that I have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Furthermore, I certify that I have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions