link.springer.com

Semantic memory - Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports

  • ️Chertkow, Howard
  • ️Sun Dec 01 2002
  • Goodglass H, Baker E: Semantic field, naming, and auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain Lang 1976, 3:359–374.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass H, Wingfield A, Ward SE: Judgments of concept similarity by normal and aphasic subjects: relation to naming and comprehension. Brain Lang 1997, 56:138–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza A, Berndt RS, Brownell HH: The semantic deficit hypothesis: perceptual parsing and object classification by aphasic patients. Brain Lang 1982, 15:161–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chertkow H, Bub D, Deaudon C, Whitehead V: On the status of object concepts in aphasia. Brain Lang 1997, 58:203–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart J Jr, Gordon B: Delineation of single-word semantic comprehension deficits in aphasia, with anatomical correlation. Ann Neurol 1990, 27:226–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Petersen SE, Raichle ME: Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science 1988, 240:1627–1631.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demb JB, Desmond JE, Wagner AD, et al.: Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity. J Neurosci 1995, 15:5870–5878.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noppeney UP, Price CJ: A PET study of stimulus- and taskinduced semantic processing. Neuroimage 2002, 15:927–935. An interesting study showing that the access of semantic and phonologic information in memory involves brain regions different from those involved when decisions are made when using semantic knowledge in particular tasks.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmough C: Separable effects of familiarity and semantic category on picture naming: an oxygen-15 PET study. Presented at Society for Neuroscience, Miami, FL, 1999.

  • Chertkow H: Altered activation of cerebral cortex in Alzheimer’s Disease during picture naming: a positron emission tomographic study. Presented at Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco, CA, 2000.

  • Hyman BT: The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: clinical-pathological studies. Neurobiol Aging 1997, 18:S27-S32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braak H, Braak E: Neuropathological staging of Alzheimerrelated changes. Acta Neuropathol 1991, 82:239–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman M, Payer F, Onishi K, et al.: Constraints on the cerebral basis for semantic processing from neuroimaging studies of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997, 63:152–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington EK, Shallice T: Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 1984, 107:829–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges JR, Patterson K: Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer’s disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33:441–459.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sacchett C, Humphreys G: Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts. Cogn Neuropsychol 1992, 9:73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah MJ, McClelland JL: A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. J Exp Psychol 1991, 120:339–357.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza A, Shelton J: Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate-inanimate distinction. J Cogn Neurosci 1998, 10:1–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carey S: Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil FC: Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman S: Development of induction within natural kinds and artificial categories. Cogn Psychol 1988, 20:65–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonnerman L, Andersen ES, Devlin JT, Kempler D, Seidenberg MS: Double dissociation of semantic categories in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Lang 1997, 57:254–279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garrard P, Patterson K, Watson PC, Hodges JR: Category specific semantic loss in dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Brain 1998, 121:633–646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moss DE: Two-eyes of a see-through: impaired and intact semantic knowledge in a case of selective deficit for living things. Neurocase 1998, 10:362–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss H: Exploring the loss of semantic memory in semantic dementia: evidence from a primed monitoring study. Neuropsychology 1995, 9:16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon MJ, Bub DN, Arguin M: Semantic and visual determinants of face recognition in a prosopagnosic patient. J Cogn Neurosci 1998, 10:362–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laiacona M, Barbarotto R, Capitani E: Semantic category dissociations in naming: is there a gender effect in Alzheimer’s disease? Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:407–419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington EK, McCarthy RA: Categories of knowledge: further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 1987, 110:1273–1296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chao LL, Haxby JV, Martin A: Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neurosci 1999, 2:913–919. Neuroimaging study suggesting that categories of objects are represented in terms of their identifying features, rather than by their category membership.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chao LL, Martin A: Cortical regions associated with perceiving, naming, and knowing about colors. J Cogn Neurosci 1999, 11:25–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Haxby JV, Lalonde FM, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG: Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science 1995, 270:102–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV: Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 1996, 379:649–652.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin JT, et al.: Is there an anatomical basis for categoryspecificity? Semantic memory study in PET and fMRI. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:54–75. Results of a positron emission tomography study and functional magnetic resonance imaging study suggesting that different semantic categories are represented in a single distributed brain system.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio H, Grabowski TJ, Tranel D, Hichwa RD, Damasio AR: A neural basis for lexical retrieval [published erratum appears in Nature 1996, 381:810]. Nature 1996, 380:499–505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cappa SF, Perani D, Schnur T, Tettamanti M, Fazio F: The effects of semantic category and knowledge type on lexical-semantic access: a PET study. Neuroimage 1998, 8:350–359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach C, Law I, Gade A, Paulson OB: Perceptual differentiation and category effects in normal object recognition: a PET study. Brain 1999, 122:2159–2170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorno-Tempini ML, Cipolotti L, Price CJ: Which level of object processing generates category specific differences in brain activation? Proc R Soc London B 2000, 12:1253–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman M, Koenig P, DeVita C, et al.: The neural basis for category-specific knowledge: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2002, 15:936–948. This functional magnetic resonance imaging study shows that artefacts and abstract nouns recruit similar cortical regions of the brain (left prefrontal and left posterolateral temporal regions). These results are inconsistent with the view that artefacts are represented in terms of sensory-motor properties, presumably because such properties would presumably not be involved in interpreting meanings of abstract nouns. These neural networks would differ from those involving animal concepts, which were found to be preferentially associated with visually based processing regions of the left ventromedical occipital cortex.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore CJ, Price CJ: A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain 1999, 122:943–962. An important study examining how stimulus modality (visual vs verbal) and semantic category information interact in different cortical brain regions.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut AM, Moo LR, Segal JB, Hart J: Neural activation during an explicit categorization task: category-or feature-specific effects? Cogn Brain Res 2002, 13:213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummery CJ, Patterson K, Hodges JR, Price CJ: Functional neuroanatomy of the semantic system: divisible by what? J Cogn Neurosci 1998, 10:766–777.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mummery CJ: Generating ‘tiger’ as an animal name or a word beginning with T: differences in brain activation [published erratum appears in Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1996, 263:1755–1756]. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci 1996, 263:989–995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perani D, Cappa SF, Bettinardi V, et al.: Different neural systems for the recognition of animals and man-made tools. Neuroreport 1995, 6:1637–1641.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perani D, Schnur T, Tettamanti M, et al.: Word and picture matching: a PET study of semantic category effects. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:293–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Schill SL, Aguirre GK, D’Esposito M, Farah MJ: A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:671–676.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fung TD, Chertkow H, Paus T, Whatmough C: IMS of the left inferior temporal cortex slows picture naming. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002, 8:206.

    Google Scholar