link.springer.com

Homologous Versus Antithetic Alternation of Generations and the Origin of Sporophytes - The Botanical Review

  • ️Haig, David
  • ️Sat Jul 26 2008
  • Allen, C. E. 1905. Die Keimung der Zygote bei Coleochaete. Berichte der deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft 23: 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, M. J. 1857. Introduction to cryptogamic botany. Bailliere, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhorst, D. W. 1953. Structure and development of the gametophyte of Psilotum nudum. American Journal of Botany 40: 649–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhorst, D. W. 1954. The gametangia and embryo of Psilotum nudum. American Journal of Botany 41: 274–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhorst, D. W. 1969. On Stromatopteris and its ill-defined organs. American Journal of Botany 56: 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, W. H. 2003. Two theories of origin of the land-plant sporophyte: which is left standing? Botanical Review 69: 125–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, F. O. 1887a. On apospory and related phenomena. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, Second Series 2: 301–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, F. O. 1887b. On the limits of the use of the terms ‘phyllome’ and ‘caulome.’ A suggestion. Annals of Botany 1: 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, F. O. 1890. On antithetic as distinct from homologous alternation of generations in plants. Annals of Botany 4: 347–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, F. O. 1898. Opening address to the British Association, Bristol meeting, Section K (Botany). Nature 59: 66–69, 88–91, 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, F. O. 1908. The origin of a land flora. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, F. O. 1935. Primitive land plants, also known as the archegoniatae. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. C., & B. E. Lemmon. 1997. The quadripolar microtubule system in lower land plants. Journal of Plant Research 110: 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. H. 1903. Antithetic versus homologous alternation. American Naturalist 37: 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. H. 1905. The structure and development of mosses and ferns (Archegoniatae), second edition. MacMillan, New York

  • Celakovsky, L. 1874. Ueber die verschiedenen Formen und die Bedeutung des Generationswechsels der Pflanzen. Sitzungsberichte der königlich böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften in Prag 1874: 21–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, C. J. 1917. Prothallia and sporelings of three New Zealand species of Lycopodium. Botanical Gazette 63: 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamisso, A. V. 1819. De animalibus quibusdam e classe Vermium Linnaeana in circumnavigatione terrae. Fasciculus primus. De Salpa. Dümmler, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. M. 1899. The origin of the leafy sporophyte. Botanical Gazette 28: 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dassler, C. L., & D. R. Farrar. 1997. Significance of form in fern gametophytes: clonal gemmiferous gametophytes of Callistopteris baueriana (Hymenophyllaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 158: 622–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J. 1982. Gametes and spores. Ideas about sexual reproduction 1750–1914. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farlow, W. G. 1874. An asexual growth from the prothallus of Pteris cretica. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 14: 266–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, J. B., & L. Digby. 1907. Studies in apospory and apogamy in ferns. Annals of Botany 21: 161–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Föyn, B. 1929. Untersuchungen über die Sexualität und Entwicklung von Algen. IV. Vorläufige Mitteilung über die Sexualität und den Generationswechsel von Cladophora und Ulva. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 47: 495–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, F. E. 1916. The algal ancestry of the higher plants. New Phytologist 15: 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, K. V. 1926. Wilhelm Hofmeister. The work and life of a nineteenth century botanist. Ray Society, London [H. M. Bower, translator].

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. E. 1985. The origin of the life cycle of land plants. American Scientist 73: 178–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. K. E., & L. W. Wilcox. 2000. The origin of alternation of generations in land plants: a focus on matrotrophy and hexose transport. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 355: 757–766.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groth-Malonek, M., & V. Knoop. 2005. Bryophytes and other basal land plants: the mitochondrial perspective. Taxon 54: 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, M. 1929. Untersuchungen über die Sexualität und Entwicklung von Algen. III. Über die Sexualität und den Generationswechsel von Chaetomorpha und Enteromorpha. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 47: 485–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeister, W. 1862. On the germination, development, and fructification of the higher Cryptogamia, and on the fructification of the Coniferæ. Ray Society, London [F. Currey, translator].

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. E. 1915. Studies in the New Zealand species of the genus Lycopodium: Part I. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 48: 253–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. E. 1921. Further studies on the prothallus, embryo, and young sporophyte of Tmesipteris. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 53: 386–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. E. 1939. The gametophyte, embryo and young rhizome of Psilotum triquetrum Swartz. Annals of Botany 3: 313–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. W., & G. E. McBride. 1976. The life-history of Coleochaete scutata (Chlorophyceae) studied by a Feulgen microspectrophotometric analysis of the DNA cycle. Journal of Phycology 12: 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo, M. A., & E. M. Kramer. 2007. The role of developmental genetics in understanding homology and morphological evolution in plants. International Journal of Plant Science 168: 61–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karol, K. G., R. M. McCourt, M. T. Cimino, & C. F. Delwiche. 2001. The closest living relatives of landplants. Science 294: 2351–2353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, P. 1994. Alternation of generations in land plants: new phylogenetic and palaeobotanical evidence. Biological Reviews 69: 293–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, W. H. 1909. A theory of alternation of generations in archegoniate plants based upon the ontogeny. New Phytologist 8: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, W. H. 1915. Phyletic and causal morphology. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Transactions of Section K. 701–721.

  • Lang, W. H., F. O. Bower, D. H. Scott, J. B. Farmer, F. W. Oliver, & A. G. Tansley. 1909. Discussion on “Alternation of generations” at the Linnean Society. New Phytologist 8: 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, M. F., & B. C. Zimmerly. 1949. Psilotum gametophytes matured under greenhouse conditions from self-sown spores. Science 110: 482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oehlkers, F. 1916. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Kernteilungen bei den Charazeen. Berichte der deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft 34: 223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltmanns, F. 1898. Die Entwickelung der Sexualorgane bei Coleochaete pulvinata. Flora 85: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, C. E. 1893. On the reduction of the chromosomes in the nuclei of plants. Annals of Botany 7: 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, D. D., D. D. Nautiyal & D. R. Misra. 1984. Gametophytes of Ophioglossaceae. Phyta Monograph 1: 1–111. Society of Indian Plant Taxonomists, Allahabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincher, H. C. 1937. A genetical interpretation of the alternation of generations. New Phytologist 36: 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, N. 1860. Beiträge zur Morphologie und Systematik der Algen. III. Die Coleochaeteen. Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Botanik 2: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, N. 1876a. Über Sprossung der Moosfrüchte. Monatsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1876: 425–429. [‘second edition’ in Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Botanik 11: 1–6 (1878)].

  • Pringsheim, N. 1876b. Über den Generationswechsel der Thallophyten und seinen Anschluss an den Generationswechsel der Moose. Monatsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1876: 869–911. [‘second edition’ in Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Botanik 11: 6–46 (1878)].

  • Pryer, K. M., E. Schuettpelz, P. G. Wolf, H. Schneider, A. R. Smith & R. Cranfill. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of ferns (monilophytes) with a focus on the early leptosporangiate divergences. American Journal of Botany 91: 1582–1598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, Y. -L., Y. Cho, J. C. Cox, & J. D. Palmer. 1998. The gain of three mitochondrial introns identifies liverworts as the earliest land plants. Nature 394: 671–674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Remy, W. 1980. Der Generationswechsel der Archegoniaten Pflanzen im Übergangsfeld von aquatischer zu terrestrischer Lebensweise. Argumenta Palaeobotanica 6: 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remy, W. & H. Hass. 1991. Gametophyten und Sporophyten im Unterdevon—Fakten und Spekulationen. Argumenta Palaeobotanica 8: 193–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remy, W., P. G. Gensel, & H. Hass. 1993. The gametophyte generation of some early Devonian land plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences 154: 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, K. E. 1975. Origin of the alternation of generations in plants: reconsideration of the traditional theories. Biologist 57: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samigullin, T. K., S. P. Yacentyuk, G. V. Degtyaryeva, K. M. Valieho-Roman, V. K. Bobrova, I. Capesius, W. F. Martin, A. V. Troitsky, V. R. Filin, & A. S. Antonov. 2002. Paraphyly of bryophytes and close relationship of hornworts and vascular plants inferred from analysis of chloroplast rDNA ITS (cpITS) sequences. Arctoa 11: 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. H. 1895. Nathanael Pringsheim. Nature 51: 399–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. H. 1896. Present position of morphological botany. Nature 54: 535–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. H. 1908. Alternation of generations in plants. Nature 79: 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenstrup, J. J. S. 1842a. Om Fortplantning og Udvikling gjennem vexlende Generationsrækker, en særegen Form for Opfostringen I de lavere Dyrklasser. Bianco Lunos, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenstrup, J. J. S. 1842b. Ueber den Generationswechsel, oder die Fortpflanzung und Entwickelung durch abwechselnde Generationen, eine eigenthümliche Form der Brutpflege in den niederen Thierclassen. Reitzel, Copenhagen [translated into German by C. H. Lorenzen].

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenstrup, J. J. S. 1845. On the alternation of generations; or, The propagation and development of animals through alternate generations: a peculiar form of fostering the young in the lower classes of animals. Ray Society, London [translated from the German version of C. H. Lorenzen by George Busk].

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger, E. 1894. The periodic reduction of the number of the chromosomes in the life-history of living organisms. Annals of Botany 8: 281–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger, E. 1906. Typische und allotypische Kernteilung. Ergebnisse und Erörterungen. Jahrbücher für wissentschaftliche Botanik 42: 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A. G. 1907. Lectures on the evolution of the Filicinean vascular system. New Phytologist 6: 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A. G. 1912. Meiosis and alternation of generations. New Phytologist 11: 213–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. N., H. Kerp, & H. Hass. 2005. Life history biology of early land plants: deciphering the gametophyte phase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 5892–5897.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. H. 1969. Sexual reproduction in Chaetosphaeridium globosum (Nordst.) Klebahn (Chlorophyceae) and description of a new species to science. Journal of Phycology 5: 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turmel, M., M. Ehara, C. Otis, & C. Lemieux. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships among streptophytes as inferred from chloroplast small and large subunit rRNA gene sequences. Journal of Phycology 38: 364–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treub, M. 1884. Études sur les Lycopodiacées. I. Le prothalle du Lycopodium cernuum L. Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 4: 107–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treub, M. 1886a. Études sur les Lycopodiacées. I. Le prothalle du Lycopodium Phlegmaria L. Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 5: 87–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treub, M. 1886b. Études sur les Lycopodiacées. II. Le développement de l’embryon chez L. Phlegmaria L. Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 5: 115–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turmel, M., C. Otis, & C. Lemieux. 2006. The chloroplast genome sequence of Chara vulgaris sheds new light into the closest green algal relatives of land plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 1324–1338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vines, S. H. 1878. The “pro-embryo” of Chara: an essay in morphology. Journal of Botany (London) 16: 355–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, H. A. 1945. Alternation of generations and classification with special reference to the teaching of elementary botany. Torreya 45: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, H. A. 1965. Alternation of generations—again. Turtox News 43: 206–209, 248–251.

  • Weismann, A. 1891. On heredity, 1883 (A. E. Shipley, translator). Pp. 67–106 in E. B. Poulton, S. Schönland, and A. E. Shipley [eds.], Essays upon heredity and kindred biological problems, Volume 1, 67–106. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  • Williams, J. L. 1904. Studies in the Dictyotaceae. I. The cytology of the tetrasporangium and the germinating tetraspore. Annals of Botany 18: 141–160.

    Google Scholar