Adoption and economic impact of improved wheat varieties in the developing world | The Journal of Agricultural Science | Cambridge Core
- ️Fri Feb 28 2025
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2006
- Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Impact Targeting and Assessment Unit, Int. Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico
- Affiliation:
Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Manhattan, KS, USA
- Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Impact Targeting and Assessment Unit, Int. Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico
- Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Impact Targeting and Assessment Unit, Int. Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico
- Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Impact Targeting and Assessment Unit, Int. Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico
- Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Impact Targeting and Assessment Unit, Int. Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico
Abstract
During the past century wheat breeders have produced a large number of genetically improved wheat lines and varieties. This activity has led to widespread adoption of improved varieties, a steady increase in average wheat yields during the past 4–5 decades and major contributions to food security and poverty reduction. The rate of generation and adoption of improved varieties, and therefore the time lag from varietal release to widespread use, varies across regions. The remarkable success of wheat improvement hinges on the decisions of millions of farmers to adopt, or replace older wheat varieties with superior material. The present paper summarizes studies on the determinants of adoption. Because adoption is a necessary but not sufficient condition for economic impact, the present paper synthesizes key assessments of impact from different farming systems in developing countries.
- Centenary Review
2006 Cambridge University Press
Type
Access options
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)