Radiation stress and mass transport in gravity waves, with application to ‘surf beats’ | Journal of Fluid Mechanics | Cambridge Core

This paper studies the second-order currents and changes in mean surface level which are caused by gravity waves of non-uniform amplitude. The effects are interpreted in terms of the radiation stresses in the waves.

The first example is of wave groups propagated in water of uniform mean depth. The problem is solved first by a perturbation analysis. In two special cases the second-order currents are found to be proportional simply to the square of the local wave amplitude: (a) when the lengths of the groups are large compared to the mean depth, and (b) when the groups are all of equal length. Then the surface is found to be depressed under a high group of waves and the mass-transport is relatively negative there. In case (a) the result can be simply related to the radiation stresses, which tend to expel fluid from beneath the higher waves.

The second example considered is the propagation of waves of steady amplitude in water of gradually varying depth. Assuming no loss of energy by friction or reflexion, the wave amplitude must vary horizontally, to maintain the flux of energy constant; it is shown that this produces a negative tilt in the mean surface level as the depth diminishes. However, if the wave height is limited by breaking, the tilt is positive. The results are in agreement with some observations by Fairchild.

Lastly, the propagation of groups of waves from deep to shallow water is studied. As the mean depth decreases, so the response of the fluid to the radiation stresses tends to increase. The long waves thus generated may be reflected as free waves, and so account for the 'surf beats’ observed by Munk and Tucker.

Generalle speaking, the changes in mean sea level produced by ocean waves are comparable with those due to horizontal wind stress. It may be necessary to allow for the wave stresses in calculating wind stress coefficients.

Burnside, W. 1915 On the modification of a train of waves as it advances into shallow water Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 14, 31.Google Scholar

Fairchild, J. C. 1958 Model study of wave set-up induced by hurricane waves at Narragansett pier, Rhode Island. Bull. Beach Erosion Board, 12, 9–20.Google Scholar

Isaacs, J.D., Williams, A. E. & Eckart, C. 1951 Total reflection of surface waves by deep water. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un. 32, 37–40.Google Scholar

Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th ed. Cambridge University Press.

Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1953 Mass-transport in water waves. Phil. Trans. A, 245, 535–81.Google Scholar

Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1956 The refraction of sea waves in shallow water. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 163–76.Google Scholar

Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1960 Mass transport in the boundary layer at a free oscillating surface. J. Fluid Mech. 8, 293–306.Google Scholar

Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Stewart, R. W. 1960 Changes in the form of short gravity waves on long waves and tidal streams. J. Fluid Mech. 8, 565–83.Google Scholar

Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Stewart, R. W. 1961 The changes in amplitude of short gravity waves on steady non-uniform currents. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 529–49.Google Scholar

Munk, W. H. 1949a Surf beats. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un. 30, 849–54.Google Scholar

Munk, W. H. 1949b The solitary wave theory and its application to surf problems. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 51, 376–424.Google Scholar

Starr, V. P. 1959 Hydrodynamical analogy t. E = mc 2. Tellus, 11, 135–8.Google Scholar

Stokes, G. G. 1847 On the theory of oscillatory waves. Trans. Camb.Phil.Soc. 8, 441–55. (Reprinted in Math. and Phys. Papers, 1,314-26.)Google Scholar

Taylor, G. I. 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 13, 182.

Tucker, M. J. 1950 Surf beats: sea waves of 1 to 5 minutes' period. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 202, 565–73.Google Scholar

Whitham, G. B. 1962 Mass, momentum and energy flux in water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 12, 135–47.Google Scholar