cambridge.org

The cometary impactor flux at the Earth | Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union | Cambridge Core

  • ️Tue Mar 04 2025

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Comets account for a small but very significant fraction of impactors on the Earth. Although the total number of Earth-crossing comets is modest as compared with asteroids, the more eccentric and inclined orbits of the comets result in much higher encounter velocities with the planet. Additionally, some Earth-crossing comets are significantly larger than any current near-Earth asteroids (NEAs); comets 1P/Halley and C/1995 O1 Hale-Bopp are good examples of this. Thus, the most energetic impacts on the Earth likely result from comets and not NEAs. The mean impact probability for long-period comets is 2.4× 10−9 per comet per perihelion passage, assuming the perihelion distribution of Everhart (1967), with a most probable encounter velocity of 53.5 km sec−1. There are 21 known Earth-crossing Jupiter-family comets with a mean impact probability of 1.6× 10−9 per comet per year and a most probable encounter velocity of 17.0 km sec−1. For the 16 known Earth-crossing Halley-type comets the mean impact probability is 1.2× 10−10 per year with a most probable encounter velocity of 51.3 km sec−1. The poor knowledge of the size distribution of cometary nuclei makes it difficult to estimate actual impact energies at this time, though that situation is slowly improving, in particular for the Jupiter-family comets.

References

Dones, L., Weissman, P.R., Levison, H.F. & Duncan, M.J. 2004, in: Festou, M.C., Keller, H.U. & Weaver, H.A. (eds.), Comets II (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), p. 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamy, P.L., Toth, I., Fernández, Y.R. & Weaver, H.A. 2004, in: Festou, M.C., Keller, H.U. & Weaver, H.A. (eds.), Comets II (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), p. 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levison, H.F. 1996, ASP Conf. Ser. Completing the Inventory of the Solar System, 107, p. 173Google Scholar

Marsden, B.G., & Steel, D.I. 1994, in: Gehrels, T., Matthews, M.S. & Schumann, A.M. (eds.), Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), p. 221Google Scholar

Shoemaker, E.M., Weissman, P.R. & Shoemaker, C.S. 1994, in: Gehrels, T., Matthews, M.S. & Schumann, A.M. (eds.), Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), p. 313Google Scholar

Weissman, P.R. 1982, In Geol. Soc. Amer. Special Paper 190: Geological Implications of Impacts of Large Asteroids and Comets on the Earth, p. 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weissman, P.R. 1989, In Geol. Soc. Amer. Special Paper 247: Global Catastrophes in Earth History, p. 211Google Scholar

Weissman, P.R. 1996, ASP Conf. Ser.: Completing the Inventory of the Solar System 107, p. 265Google Scholar

Weissman, P.R. 1997, In Near-Earth Objects, Annals NY Acad. Sci. 822, 67Google Scholar

Weissman, P.R., Bottke, W.F. & Levison, H.F., 2002, in: Bottke, W.F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P. & Binzel, R.P (eds.), Asteroids III (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), p. 669CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weissman, P.R., Asphaug, E. & Lowry, S.C. 2004, in: Festou, M.C., Keller, H.U. & Weaver, H.A. (eds.), Comets II (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), p. 337CrossRefGoogle Scholar