Forced Changes Only: A New Take on the Law of Inertia | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core

Newton’s First Law of Motion is typically understood to govern only the motion of force-free bodies. This paper argues on textual and conceptual grounds that the law is in fact a stronger, more general principle. The First Law limits the extent to which any body can change its state of motion—even if that body is subject to impressed forces. The misunderstanding can be traced back to an error in the first English translation of Newton’s Principia, which was published a few years after Newton’s death.

Anderson, James L. 1990. “Newton’s first two laws of motion are not definitions.” American Journal of Physics 58(12):1192–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arons, Arnold B. 1990. A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Barbour, Julian B. 1989. Absolute or Relative Motion: The Discovery of Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barbour, Julian B. 2001. The End of Time. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Harvey. 2006. Physical Relativity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard. 1963. “Pemberton’s Translation of Newton’s Principia, with Notes on Motte’s Translation.” Isis 54(3):319–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard. 1964. “‘Quantum in Se Est’: Newton’s Concept of Inertia in Relation to Descartes and Lucretius.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 19(2):131–55.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard. 1980. The Newtonian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard. 1999. A Guide to Newton’s Principia. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard. 2002. “Newton’s concepts of force and mass, with notes on the Laws of Motion.” In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, edited by Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George E., 61–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dempsey, Liam. 2006. “Written in the flesh: Isaac Newton on the mind–body relation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (3):420–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descartes, René. 1644. Principia Philosophiae. Amsterdam: Ludovicum Elzevirium.Google Scholar

Dijksterhuis, E.J. 1963. The Mechanisation of the World Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dijksterhuis, E.J. 1996. De Mechanisering van het wereldbeeld. Seventh impression. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.Google Scholar

diSessa, Andrea. 1982. “Unlearning Aristotelean Physics: A study of knowledge-based learning.” Cognitive Science 6 (1):37–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Earman, John and Friedman, Michael. 1973. “The Meaning and Status of Newton’s Law of Inertia and the Nature of Gravitational Forces.” Philosophy of Science 40(3):329–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eddington, Arthur. 1929. The Nature of the Physical World. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ellis, Brian. 1962. “Newton’s Concept of Motive Force.” Journal of the History of Ideas 23(2):273–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, Brian. 1965. “The Origins and Nature of Newton’s Laws of Motion.” In Beyond The Edge Of Certainty: Essays In Contemporary Science And Philosophy, edited by Colodny, Robert, 29–68. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Feynman, Richard, Leighton, Robert and Sands, Matthew. 1963. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. I. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Google Scholar

Galili, Igal, and Tseitlin, Michael. 2003. “Newton’s First Law: Text, Translations, Interpretations and Physics Education.” Science and Education 12: 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber, Daniel. 2012. “Leibniz, Newton and Force.” In Interpreting Newton, edited by Janiak, Andrew and Schliesser, Eric, 33–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1965. “Newton’s First Law: A Philosopher’s Door into Natural Philosophy.” In Beyond The Edge Of Certainty: Essays In Contemporary Science And Philosophy, edited by Colodny, Robert, 69–74. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Hay, William H. 1956. “On the Nature of Newton’s First Law of Motion.” Philosophical Review 65(1):95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herivel, John. 1965. The Background to Newton’s Principia. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hertz, Heinrich. 1899. The Principles of Mechanics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Koslow, Arnold. 1969. “The Law of Inertia: Some Remarks on Its Structure and Significance.” In Philosophy, Science, and Method, edited by Ernest Nagel, Sidney Morgenbesser, Patrick Suppes, and Morton Gabriel White, 549–67. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Koyré, Alexandre. 1950. “The Significance of the Newtonian Synthesis.” Journal of General Education 4(4):256–68.Google Scholar

Koyré, Alexandre. 1965. “Newton and Descartes.” In Newtonian Studies, 53–114. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas. 2000. The Road Since Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Landau, L.D., Ahieser, A.I., and Lifshits., E.M. 1967. General Physics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Lange, Ludwig. 1885/2014. “On the Law of Inertia—Translation of: Ueber das Beharrungsgesetz.” Translated by Herbert Pfister. European Physics Journal H 39 (2):251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindsay, Robert Bruce, and Margenau, Henry. 1957. Foundations of Physics. 2nd ed. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Bernd. 1992. “What Is Newton’s Law of Inertia About? Philosophical Reasoning and Explanation in Newton’s Principia.” Science in Context 5 (1):139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mach, Ernst. 1919. The Science of Mechanics. 4th ed. Translated by T. McCormack. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Maudlin, Tim. 2012. Philosophy of Physics: Space and Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McCloskey, Michael. 1983. “Naive theories of motion.” In Mental Models, edited by Dedre Gentner and Albert L. Stevens, 299–324. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

McGuire, J.E. 1994. “Natural Motion and Its Causes: Newton on the ‘Vis Insita’ of Bodies.” In Self-Motion from Aristotle to Newton, edited by Mary Louise Gill and James G. Lennox, 305–330. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. 1729. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by Andrew Motte. London: Benjamin Motte. Online transcript at en.wikisource.org.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. 1759. Principes mathématiques de la philosophie naturelle. Translated by Émilie du Châtelet, Paris: Desaint & Saillant, et Lambert.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. 1777. Mathematical principles of natural philosophy, Vol. 1. Translated and with commentary by Robert Thorp. London: W. Stratham and T. Cadell.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. 1846. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. First American edition. Edited by N.W. Chittenden. Translated by Andrew Motte. New York: Daniel Adee. Online transcript at en.wikisource.org.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. 1872. Mathematische Principien der Naturlehre. Translated by J.P. Wolfers. Berlin: R. Oppenheim. Online transcript at de.wikisource.org.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. 1925. Principii di filosofia naturale - Teoria della gravitazione. Translated by F. Enriques and U. Forti. Rome: Alberto Stock.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. 1962. Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical principles of natural philosophy and his System of the world. Edited by Florian Cajori. Translated by Andrew Motte. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. 1999. The Principia. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Pearl, Judea. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pfister, Herbert. 2004. “Newton’s First Law Revisited.” Foundations of Physics Letters 17(1):49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poincaré, Henri. 1905. Science and Hypothesis. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar

Pourciau, Bruce. 2006. “Newton’s Interpretation of Newton’s Second Law.” Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 60(2):157–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reif, Frederick. 1995. Understanding Basic Mechanics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rouse Ball, W.W. 1893. An Essay on Newton’s “Principia.” London: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Kelvin (William Thomson), and Tait, P.G.. 1883. Treatise on Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Resnick, Robert, David, Halliday, and Krane, Kenneth S.. 2002. Physics. 5th ed. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rigden, John S. 1987. “High Thoughts about Newton’s First Law.” American Journal of Physics 55 (4):297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stein, Howard. 2002. “Newton’s Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, edited by I. Bernard Cohen and George E. Smith, 256–307. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Lloyd William. 1959. Physics, the Pioneer Science, Vol. 1: Mechanics, Heat, Sound. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Thorne, Kip and Blandford, Roger. 2017. Modern Classical Physics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Torretti, Roberto. 1983. Relativity and Geometry. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Wolff, Michael. 1978. Geschichte der Impetustheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar