nature.com

Linkage in the Silkworm: a Correction - Nature

  • ️BATESON, W.
  • ️Thu Nov 20 1919
  • Letter
  • Published: 20 November 1919

Nature volume 104page 315 (1919)Cite this article

Abstract

IN referring to Tanaka's work on silkworms I made (NATURE, November 6, p. 216) a mistake which should be corrected. His discovery was not that two characters linked in the male were not linked in the female, but that in a case of linkage common to both males and females it is only in the males that crossingover occurs. Since, on the analogy of Abraxas, the female is presumably in the silkworm the heterozygous sex, this observation is complementary to and consistent with Morgan's evidence that in Drosophila there is no crossing-over in the male, which in that animal is heterozygous in the sex-character. The paper is in Journ. Coll. Agr., Tohoku Imp. Univ., vii., 1916, pt. 3. Also the forms found by Patterson associated with males and females should have been called “asexual”, not “inter-sexes”.

Similar content being viewed by others

Article PDF

Authors

  1. W. BATESON

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

BATESON, W. Linkage in the Silkworm: a Correction. Nature 104, 315 (1919). https://doi.org/10.1038/104315c0

Download citation

  • Issue Date: 20 November 1919

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/104315c0