Linkage in the Silkworm: a Correction - Nature
- ️BATESON, W.
- ️Thu Nov 20 1919
- Letter
- Published: 20 November 1919
Nature volume 104, page 315 (1919)Cite this article
-
250 Accesses
-
3 Altmetric
Abstract
IN referring to Tanaka's work on silkworms I made (NATURE, November 6, p. 216) a mistake which should be corrected. His discovery was not that two characters linked in the male were not linked in the female, but that in a case of linkage common to both males and females it is only in the males that crossingover occurs. Since, on the analogy of Abraxas, the female is presumably in the silkworm the heterozygous sex, this observation is complementary to and consistent with Morgan's evidence that in Drosophila there is no crossing-over in the male, which in that animal is heterozygous in the sex-character. The paper is in Journ. Coll. Agr., Tohoku Imp. Univ., vii., 1916, pt. 3. Also the forms found by Patterson associated with males and females should have been called “asexual”, not “inter-sexes”.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Authors
- W. BATESON
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BATESON, W. Linkage in the Silkworm: a Correction. Nature 104, 315 (1919). https://doi.org/10.1038/104315c0
Issue Date: 20 November 1919
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/104315c0