nature.com

Pattern recognition receptors TLR4 and CD14 mediate response to respiratory syncytial virus - Nature Immunology

  • ️Finberg, Robert W.
  • ️Wed Nov 01 2000

Main

CD14 and Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are essential for initiating the innate response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Gram-negative bacteria as well as other microbial components of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, mycoplasmas, spirochetes and fungi1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. The role of innate immune receptors in the response to viruses has been largely unexplored. We have examined the interactions of several respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) proteins with human monocytes and demonstrate that the fusion protein of RSV induces proinflammatory cytokines, and that this response is dependent on expression of CD14 and TLR4. We also show that TLR4 expression has an important role in the control of viral replication in vivo; RSV replicated to a higher concentration and persisted longer in TLR4-deficient mice than in normal control mice.

RSV, a single-stranded negative-sense RNA virus of the Paramyxovirus family, is the single most common cause of serious lower respiratory tract disease of infants and young children worldwide and is a high priority for vaccine development18,19. Developing a safe and effective vaccine has been difficult, and it is likely that a better understanding of the pathogenesis of disease will assist vaccine development. The ability of different RSV proteins to alter the early, innate immune response is probably important to the pathogenesis of this disease20,21,22,23,24. In this study, we examined the ability of three RSV proteins—the attachment protein (G), the fusion protein (F) and the nucleocapsid protein (N)—to induce proinflammatory cytokines. Both the G and F proteins have been shown to be important in inducing protective immunity against RSV infection. Our studies reveal that RSV F protein induced interleukin 6 (IL-6) production by monocytic cells expressing CD14 and TLR4. RSV G and N proteins induced weaker cytokine responses than F. Thus, the F protein is capable of stimulating an innate immune response.

Results

Viral stimulation of inflammatory cytokines

We examined the ability of several purified RSV viral proteins to stimulate proinflammatory cytokine secretion from human mononuclear cells. We first incubated purified RSV F, G and N proteins with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and found that the F but not the G or N proteins of RSV induced a marked increase in IL-6 secretion (Fig. 1 and data not shown). This response was blocked by monoclonal antibody to CD14 (MY4) suggesting that RSV F protein induced IL-6 through its interaction with this monocyte innate immune receptor (Fig. 1b). Both purified human monocytes (>90% CD14+) and thioglycollate-induced mouse peritoneal macrophages responded to incubation with the F protein with a marked increase in IL-6 production (Fig. 2) as well as IL-8, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (Fig. 1c) and IL-1β (data not shown), confirming the central role of monocytic cells as the source of the cytokine production. Monocytes responded in a dose-dependent manner to RSV F (Fig. 1c) and to UV-inactivated whole RSV virus (Fig. 1d).

Figure 1: Viral proteins stimulate cytokine secretion from PBMC and monocytes.
figure 1

Purified human monocytes were stimulated with either (a) LPS (10 ng/ml) or (b) RSV fusion (F) protein (1 μg/ml). Where indicated the cells were treated with 10 μg/ml of anti-CD2 (control antibody), 10 μg/ml of MY4 (anti-CD14) or 1 μg/ml of polymyxin B (PMB). Control cultures were stimulated with medium alone or with the elution buffer used to isolate the viral proteins. Supernatants of PBMC cultures were collected 18 h after addition of the stimulants for analysis of cytokine secretion. IL-6 concentration was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (c) Purified human monocytes were stimulated with various concentrations of RSV F. IL-8, IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations in 18 h culture supernatants were determined by ELISA. (d) Purified human monocytes were stimulated with various levels of sucrose gradient purified and UV-inactivated RSV. Virus levels are expressed as plaque forming units of live virus before inactivation. Culture supernatants were collected 16 h after the addition of virus and IL-8 concentrations determined by ELISA. (e,f)CHO cells stably transfected with human CD14 and an NF-κB promoter driven CD25 reporter gene were incubated with either (e) LPS (100 ng/ml) or (f) RSV F (1 μg/ml). CD25 expression was measured by flow cytometry of cells stained using a control PE-labeled mAb (solid figure) or PE-labeled CD25-specific mAb. CD25 staining of cells incubated in medium alone are shown as a gray lines. CD25 staining of cells incubated with (e) LPS or (f) RSV F are shown as black lines.

Full size image

Figure 2: Cytokine-stimulating activity of RSV F protein is trypsin-sensitive.
figure 2

LPS or RSV F protein were incubated with trypsin immobilized on agarose beads for 15 min. Trypsin-digested (shaded bars) or mock-treated (filled bars) LPS and RSV F protein were then added to cultures of purified (a) human monocytes or (b) mouse peritoneal macrophages. Incubation of LPS or RSV F protein with immobilized agarose alone did not affect their cytokine stimulating activity. IL-6 secretion was determined by ELISA.

Full size image

The role of NF-κB in the response to RSV F was examined using an NF-κB reporter cell line9. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing human CD14 and a stably integrated NF-κB–driven CD25 reporter gene were incubated with RSV F or medium. RSV F-induced CD25 expression on the CHO reporter cells and the expression levels were similar to those induced by LPS treatment (Fig. 1e,f). CHO cells express TLR4 but not TLR29; transfection with TLR2 enhanced the NF-κB–dependent reporter gene expression in response to RSV F (data not shown).

The possibility that the cytokine-stimulating activity of the RSV F protein was due to endotoxin contamination was ruled out with the use of two approaches. First, polymyxin B (PMB), a polycationic antibiotic which neutralizes LPS25, was added to the RSV F protein preparations. PMB did not alter the ability of RSV F protein to stimulate IL-6 secretion, but did prevent the response to LPS (Fig. 1a,b). Second, treatment of the RSV F protein with trypsin before addition to the macrophage cultures abolished the cytokine-stimulating activity of RSV F, but had no significant effect on the cytokine-stimulating activity of LPS for human monocytes or murine macrophages (Fig. 2). These studies suggest that the cytokine-stimulating activity of the RSV F preparation was due to the protein component. RSV F protein isolated by either immunoaffinity chromatography or by lectin affinity chromatography was equally effective in stimulating IL-6 secretion from monocytes. In contrast, RSV G and N proteins, which were isolated by immunoaffinity chromatography under conditions similar to those used to purify RSV F, only weakly stimulated IL-6 secretion (data not shown). Further, elution buffer did not induce IL-6 secretion.

Monoclonal antibody inhibition of RSV F

RSV F–containing fractions from lectin affinity purification were further studied by monoclonal antibody (mAb) blocking, to confirm that the active component of the isolated material was the F protein itself. RSV F was incubated with mAbs to F, control mAbs to RSV G or CD3 bound to protein A–sepharose beads. The cytokine-stimulating activity of the lectin-purified RSV F was depleted by incubation with either of two mAbs to F but not with control antibodies (Fig. 3). In contrast, the cytokine-stimulating activity of LPS was not affected by incubation with anti-F or control antibodies.

Figure 3: Monoclonal antibodies specifically block RSV F cytokine stimulating activity.
figure 3

(a) LPS or (b) RSV F were incubated with monoclonal antibodies to CD3 (OKT3), RSV G (130-2G) or RSV F protein (131-2A and 133-1H) immobilized on protein A sepharose beads. After removal of the beads, the LPS and RSV F preparations were added to human monocyte cultures and IL-6 secretion was measured as described above.

Full size image

Role of CD14 and TLR4

We further examined the role of CD14 in the response to RSV F protein using CD14−/− (knockout) mice. IL-6 (and IL-1β) was produced by macrophages from CD14+/− hemizygous mice, but not by macrophages from CD14−/− mice, when stimulated by RSV F protein (Fig. 4). Thus, F protein induction of IL-6 is dependent on the presence of CD14. This result suggested that RSV F protein stimulated monocytes by using receptors that shared components with the macrophage LPS receptor system.

Figure 4: CD14 knockout mice do not respond to RSV F protein.
figure 4

Macrophages were collected from CD14−/− knockout mice or their CD14+/− hemizygous, control littermates and either unstimulated (open bars) or stimulated with 10 ng/ml of LPS (shaded bars) or 1 μg/ml of RSV F protein (filled bars). Responses to LPS and to RSV F protein were dependent on CD14. Macrophages from CD14 knockout mice responded normally to heat killed Staphylococcus aureus (data not shown).

Full size image

We next examined the role of TLR4, a major LPS signal transducing receptor, in the F protein–induced IL-6 production of macrophages, using mice with two types of TLR4 deficiency. C57BL10/ScCr mice have a deletion of the gene encoding TLR4, whereas C3H/HeJ mice have a spontaneous point mutation in the intracellular domain of TLR4 that blocks LPS signaling26,27,28. These mouse strains respond poorly to LPS, suggesting that TLR4 is an important coreceptor for endotoxin responses. In both strains of TLR4-mutant mice, neither LPS nor the F protein induced IL-6 secretion (Fig. 5). These data suggest that the presence of TLR4 is a requirement for RSV F protein–induced IL-6 responses in monocytic cells.

Figure 5: TLR4 is required for macrophage responses to LPS and RSV F protein.
figure 5

Macrophages were isolated from mice expressing normal TLR4, mutant TLR4, or mice lacking the gene encoding TLR4. The cells were either unstimulated (lightly shaded bars) or stimulated with 10 ng/ml of LPS (darkly shaded bars) or 1 μg/ml of RSV F protein (filled bars) for 18 h. IL-6 secretion into the culture supernatants was determined by ELISA.

Full size image

RSV infection of TLR4-deficient mice

Our experiments suggest that TLR4 is an important receptor for innate immune recognition of RSV F protein. The immune response to the F protein plays a critical role in the severity of RSV infection20,21,22,23,24. We hypothesized that TLR4-deficient mice would be unable to mount an innate immune response to RSV F protein and, therefore, their ability to respond to RSV infection would be compromised. We tested this hypothesis using a murine model of intranasal infection with live RSV in TLR4-deficient C57BL10/ScCr mice and normal control mice (Fig. 6). TLR4-deficient mice have higher levels of infectious virus in the lungs than control mice. Further, the TLR4-deficient mice are either unable to clear RSV from their lungs or clear the virus several days later than control mice. (Detailed studies of RSV infection and immune function in large groups of TLR4-deficient mice have already been performed29. These studies confirm that TLR4-deficient mice mount a weak innate immune response to RSV compared to wild type mice.) These results suggest that TLR4 is important for clearing RSV infection. In the absence of TLR4, an inadequate response is mounted and RSV replicates to high levels in the lungs.

Figure 6: Live RSV persists longer in TLR4-deficient than in control mice.
figure 6

TLR4-normal C57BL10/ScSN and TLR4-deficient C57BL10/ScCr mice were infected by intranasal inoculation with RSV A2 strain (106 plaque forming units per mouse). At the indicated time points, three mice of each strain were killed and the amounts of infectious virus in individual lung homogenates determined with a Vero cell plaque assay. The data shown are the mean number of plaque-forming units of RSV in individual lungs of infected mice from one of four separate experiments with similar results.

Full size image

Discussion

Our studies suggest that RSV F protein stimulated innate immunity through shared components of the innate immune activation pathway, TLR4 and CD14. The importance of TLR proteins in the innate immune responses is suggested by their conservation in plants, insects and vertebrates30,31,32,33. In Drosophila, the immune response to fungal infection is dependent on Toll, a type I transmembrane receptor33,34,35. The Drosophila immune response to bacterial infection is dependent on 18 wheeler, a Toll-like gene36. Toll, similar to CD14, has an extracellular domain containing leucine-rich repeats33. The cytoplasmic domains of Toll proteins are homologous to the cytoplasmic domain of mammalian type I interleukin 1 receptors (IL-1R) and to plant proteins involved in disease resistance30,31,32,33. Activation of Toll receptors leads to signal transduction and gene expression via the NF-κB pathway or its equivalent33.

A family of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) has been identified in human cells30,31,32. At least two TLRs have been recently implicated in LPS-induced signal transduction, TLR2 and TLR45,6,7,8. TLR4 is the major LPS receptor of murine and hamster cells, and is probably important for LPS stimulation of human cells as well9,26,27,28,37. It has also been shown that TLR2 is an LPS receptor in transfected cell lines, but unlike TLR4, its expression is not required for LPS activation7,8,9. Similarly, we find that TLR2 expression is not required for responses to RSV F protein but that TLR2 can serve as a receptor for RSV F responses (data not shown). TLR2 expression is, however, essential for responses to Gram-positive bacteria, mycobacteria and spirochetes10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17.

We have shown that a viral protein can stimulate an innate immune response through TLRs and CD14 proteins. It is likely that activation of the innate antiviral immune response via TLR4 and CD14 is important in the pathogenesis of RSV disease, as well as other viral infections. Use of this common CD14-TLR receptor pathway in response to viral, bacterial and fungal components may have important implications for control of the inflammatory response to infection. Thus, our data suggest that therapies that target the expression or signaling of TLRs or CD14 may be useful in altering the course of viral infections as well as bacterial and fungal infections.

Methods

Cell purification and stimulation.

Human PBMC were isolated from leukopaks (discarded leukocytes from platelet donations) by density gradient centrifugation using Histopaque (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Monocytes were isolated from PBMC by depletion of T and NK cells38. Briefly, PBMC were incubated with mAbs to CD3 (OKT3, ATCC) and CD2 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), and CD3+ CD2+ cells were removed by magnetic bead depletion using goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin–conjugated magnetic beads (Advanced Magnetics Inc. Cambridge, MA) at a ratio of 10:1 bead:cell. The remaining cells were >90% monocytes, as determined by anti-CD14 staining and forward- and side-light scatter analysis using a FACScan (Becton-Dickenson, Elmhurst, IL). Monocytes were maintained in Ham's F-12 10% fetal calf serum, l-glutamine, and penicillin and streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2.

Monocytes or macrophages were stimulated with LPS (E. coli O111:B4, Sigma), RSV proteins or medium alone for 18 h at 37 °C. IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α and IL-1β secretion into the culture supernatants were determined by sandwich ELISA (Endogen, Cambridge, MA). Data are expressed as the mean ± s.d. of duplicate determinations. Where indicated, cells were incubated with 10 μg/ml of mAb to CD14 (MY4, Coulter-Immunotech, Westbrook, ME), control mAb to CD2 (PharMingen) or polymyxin B (1 μg/ml, Sigma) before the addition of F protein or LPS.

Peritoneal exudate macrophages were isolated from mice by intraperitoneal injection of 1 ml of a 3% w/v thioglycollate solution three days before peritoneal lavage. All cells were cultured in 24-well tissue culture plates at a concentration of 1 × 106 to 5 × 106 per well in 1 ml of medium.

RSV protein and virus preparations.

RSV proteins were purified by affinity chromatography using mAbs to the F, G and N proteins according to the published method39. Briefly, The A2 strain of RSV was grown in Vero cell monolayers until the cytopathic effect was extensive. The culture medium was discarded and the cells lysed with detergent buffer containing 1 % Triton X-100 and 1% deoxycholic acid. After clarification by centrifugation, the lysate was passed over an affinity column containing the mAb. After washing extensively, the column was eluted with 0.1 M glycine, 0.1% Triton X-100, pH 2.5. For elution of the N protein, Triton was not included. The eluted fractions were buffered to pH 7 with Tris HCl, and the purity of the proteins assessed by PAGE and western blotting, as well as by solid-phase enzyme immunoassay using a panel of mAbs. Lectin-purified F protein was obtained from RSV A2–infected Vero cells. Briefly, RSV-infected Vero cells were frozen and thawed, sonicated and treated with 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris and 0.5% Triton X-100, pH 8.3 for 1 h on ice in the presence of DNase, RNase, and a protease inhibitor (PMSF). The treated cell lysate was centrifuged for 1 h at 27,000g to remove cell components and virus. The clarified supernatant was recirculated over a concanavalin A lectin column for 16 h. After washing the column with PBS, the lectin-bound F protein was eluted by competition with free mannose and GlcNAc in a PBS-based elution buffer. RSV F was also enriched by two passages over a wheatgerm agglutinin column to remove G protein (seeWeb Figure 1 on the supplementary information page of Nature Immunology on line). The eluted material was highly enriched for F protein and made free of G protein by western blotting. Where indicated, 100 X stocks of RSV F protein (100 μg/ml) or LPS (1 μg/ml) were incubated with immobilized trypsin (Sigma) for 15 mins at 37 °C. Trypsin beads were removed by centrifugation before addition of the stimulants to cultured monocytic cells. Monoclonal antibodies to RSV F, G and CD3 (100 μg) bound to protein A sepharose beads (100 μl) were added to 2X stocks of RSV F (2 μg/ml) or LPS (20 ng/ml) in 600 μl of culture medium. After an 18-h incubation at 4 °C, the beads were removed by centrifugation and the stimulants were added to cultured monocytes.

RSV infection.

Mice were infected with RSV strain A2 grown in Vero cells and titered as previously described22,40. Mice were anesthetized and inoculated intranasally with 106 plaque forming units of RSV. At various time points after infection, mice were killed and lung viral titers were determined by incubating Vero cells with serial dilutions of lung homogenates or a virus standard41. Viral plaques were enumerated 24 h later in methanol fixed and hematoxylin-eosin stained Vero cell cultures22,40.

References

  1. Ulevitch, R. J. Recognition of bacterial endotoxins by receptor-dependent mechanisms. Adv. Immunol. 53, 267–289 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wright, S. D., Ramos, R. A., Tobias, P. S., Ulevitch, R. J. & Mathison, J. C. CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein. Science 249, 1431–1433 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pugin, J. et al. CD14 is a pattern recognition receptor. Immunity 1, 509–516 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Savedra, R., Jr., Delude, R. L., Ingalls, R. R., Fenton, M. J. & Golenbock, D. T. Mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan recognition requires a receptor that shares components of the endotoxin signaling system. J. Immunol. 157, 2549– 2554 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chow, J. C., Young, D. W., Golenbock, D. T., Christ, W. J. & Gusovsky, F. Toll-like receptor-4 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced signal transduction. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 10689–10692 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimazu, R. et al. MD-2, a molecule that confers lipopolysaccharide responsiveness on Toll-like receptor 4. J. Exp. Med. 189, 1777–1782 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, R. -B. et al. Toll-like receptor-2 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced cellular signalling. Nature 395, 284– 288 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirschning, C. J., Wesche, H., Merrill Ayres, T. & Rothe, M. Human toll-like receptor 2 confers responsiveness to bacterial lipopolysaccharide . J. Exp. Med. 188, 2091– 2097 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heine, H. et al. Cutting edge: cells that carry a null allele for Toll-like receptor 2 are capable of responding to endotoxin. J. Immunol. 162, 6971–6975 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshimura, A. et al. Cutting edge: recognition of Gram-positive bacterial cell wall components by the innate immune system occurs via Toll-like receptor 2. J Immunol 163, 1–5 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Means, T. K. et al. The CD14 ligands lipoarabinomannan and lipopolysaccharide differ in their requirement for toll-like receptors. J. Immunol. 163, 6748–6755 ( 1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Means, T. K. et al. Human toll-like receptors mediate cellular activation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 163, 3920–3927 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwandner, R., Dziarski, R., Wesche, H., Rothe, M. & Kirschning, C. J. Peptidoglycan- and lipoteichoic acid-induced cell activation is mediated by toll-like receptor 2. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17406–17409 ( 1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirschfeld, M. et al. Cutting edge: inflammatory signaling by borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins is mediated by toll-like receptor 2. J. Immunol. 163, 2382–2386 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lien, E. et al. Toll-like receptor 2 functions as a pattern recognition receptor for diverse bacterial products. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 33419–33425 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brightbill, H. D. et al. Host defense mechanisms triggered by microbial lipoproteins through toll-like receptors. Science 285, 732–736 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aliprantis, A. O. et al. Cell activation and apoptosis by bacterial lipoproteins through toll-like receptor-2. Science 285, 736– 739 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Heilman, C. A. From the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the World Health Organization. Respiratory syncytial and parainfluenza viruses. J. Infect. Dis. 161, 402–406 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hall, C. B. et al. Respiratory syncytial viral infection in children with compromised immune function. N. Engl. J. Med. 315, 77 –81 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alwan, W. H., Kozlowska, W. J. & Openshaw, P. J. Distinct types of lung disease caused by functional subsets of antiviral T cells. J. Exp. Med. 179, 81–89 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prince, G. A. et al. Enhancement of respiratory syncytial virus pulmonary pathology in cotton rats by prior intramuscular inoculation of formalin-inactiva ted virus. J. Virol. 57, 721– 728 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Waris, M. E., Tsou, C., Erdman, D. D., Day, D. B. & Anderson, L. J. Priming with live respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prevents the enhanced pulmonary inflammatory response seen after RSV challenge in BALB/c mice immunized with formalin-inactivated RSV. J. Virol. 71, 6935–6939 ( 1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Graham, B. S. et al. Priming immunization determines T helper cytokine mRNA expression patterns in lungs of mice challenged with respiratory syncytial virus. J. Immunol. 151, 2032–2040 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Anderson, L. J. & Heilman, C. A. Protective and disease-enhancing immune responses to respiratory syncytial virus. J. Infect. Dis. 171, 1–7 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cavaillon, J. M. & Haeffner-Cavaillon, N. Polymyxin-B inhibition of LPS-induced interleukin-1 secretion by human monocytes is dependent upon the LPS origin. Mol. Immunol. 23, 965 –969 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Poltorak, A. et al. Defective LPS Signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr Mice: Mutations in Tlr4 Gene. Science 282, 2085 –2088 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoshino, K. et al. Cutting Edge: Toll-Like Receptor 4 (TLR4)-Deficient Mice Are Hyporesponsive to Lipopolysaccharide: Evidence for TLR4 as the Lps Gene Product . J. Immunol. 162, 3749– 3752 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Qureshi, S. T. et al. Endotoxin-tolerant Mice Have Mutations in Toll-like Receptor 4 (Tlr4). J. Exp. Med. 189, 615– 625 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Haynes, L. M. et al. Involvement of Toll-like Receptor-4 in Innate Immunity to Respiratory Syncytial Virus, J. Immunol. (submitted, 2000).

  30. Rock, F. L., Hardiman, G., Timans, J. C., Kastelein, R. A. & Bazan, J. F. A family of human receptors structurally related to Drosophila Toll. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 588–593 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Medzhitov, R., Preston-Hurlburt, P. & Janeway, C. A., Jr. A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature 388, 394–397 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chaudhary, P. M. et al. Cloning and characterization of two Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor-like genes TIL3 and TIL4: evidence for a multi-gene receptor family in humans. Blood 91, 4020–4027 ( 1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Belvin, M. P. & Anderson, K. V. A conserved signaling pathway: the Drosophila toll-dorsal pathway. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 393–416 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lemaitre, B., Nicolas, E., Michaut, L., Reichhart, J. M. & Hoffmann, J. A. The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell 86, 973–983 ( 1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Meister, M., Lemaitre, B. & Hoffmann, J. A. Antimicrobial peptide defense in Drosophila. Bioessays 19, 1019–1026 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Williams, M. J., Rodriguez, A., Kimbrell, D. A. & Eldon, E. D. The 18-wheeler mutation reveals complex antibacterial gene regulation in Drosophila host defense. EMBO J. 16, 6120– 6130 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Takeuchi, O. et al. Differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial cell wall components. Immunity 11, 443–451 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Solomon, K. R. et al. Heterotrimeric G proteins physically associated with the lipopolysaccharide receptor CD14 modulate both In vivo and In vitro responses to lipopolysaccharide. J. Clin. Invest. 102, 2019–2027 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Walsh, E. E., Brandriss, M. W. & Schlesinger, J. J. Purification and characterization of the respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein. J. Gen. Virol. 66, 409–415 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Graham, B. S., Perkins, M. D., Wright, P. F. & Karzon, D. T. Primary respiratory syncytial virus infection in mice. J. Med. Virol. 26, 153–162 ( 1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tripp, R. A., Jones, L., Anderson, L. J. & Brown, M. P. CD40 Ligand (CD154) Enhances the Th1 and Antibody Responses to Respiratory Syncytial Virus in the BALB/c Mouse. J. Immunol. 164 , 5913–5921 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health RO1AI31628 and RO1AI39576 (to R.W.F.), RO1GM54060 and RO1AI38515 (to D.T.G.), and RO1DK50305 (to D.T.G. and M.W.F.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, 01605, MA, USA

    Evelyn A. Kurt-Jones & Robert W. Finberg

  2. Department of Adult Oncology Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Infectious Disease Program, Boston, 02115, MA, USA

    Evelyn A. Kurt-Jones, Lana Popova, Laura Kwinn & Robert W. Finberg

  3. Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center of Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, 30333, GA, USA

    Lia M. Haynes, Les P. Jones, Ralph A. Tripp & Larry J. Anderson

  4. University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA

    Edward E. Walsh

  5. Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115, MA, USA

    Mason W. Freeman

  6. The Maxwell Finland Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, 02118, MA, USA

    Douglas T. Golenbock

Authors

  1. Evelyn A. Kurt-Jones

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lana Popova

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laura Kwinn

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lia M. Haynes

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Les P. Jones

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ralph A. Tripp

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Edward E. Walsh

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mason W. Freeman

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Douglas T. Golenbock

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Larry J. Anderson

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Robert W. Finberg

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyn A. Kurt-Jones.

Supplementary information

Web Figure 1

Lectin purified RSV F protein analyzed by SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions. Protein bands were visualized by silver staining. RSV F exists in several naturally occurring forms, including a 145 kD trimer and a 70 kD dimer. F dimers consist of 48 kD and 28 kD components. (MW, molecular weight markers.)

About this article

Cite this article

Kurt-Jones, E., Popova, L., Kwinn, L. et al. Pattern recognition receptors TLR4 and CD14 mediate response to respiratory syncytial virus. Nat Immunol 1, 398–401 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/80833

Download citation

  • Received: 12 July 2000

  • Accepted: 20 September 2000

  • Issue Date: November 2000

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/80833