nature.com

Dual epithelial origin of vertebrate oral teeth - Nature

  • ️Cerny, Robert
  • ️Sun Sep 14 2008
  • Letter
  • Published: 14 September 2008

Nature volume 455pages 795–798 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

The oral cavity of vertebrates is generally thought to arise as an ectodermal invagination1,2. Consistent with this, oral teeth are proposed to arise exclusively from ectoderm, contributing to tooth enamel epithelium, and from neural crest derived mesenchyme, contributing to dentin and pulp3,4,5. Yet in many vertebrate groups, teeth are not restricted only to the oral cavity6,7,8,9, but extend posteriorly as pharyngeal teeth that could be derived either directly from the endodermal epithelium, or from the ectodermal epithelium that reached this location through the mouth or through the pharyngeal slits6. However, when the oropharyngeal membrane, which forms a sharp ecto/endodermal border10, is broken, the fate of these cells is poorly known. Here, using transgenic axolotls with a combination of fate-mapping approaches, we present reliable evidence of oral teeth derived from both the ectoderm and endoderm and, moreover, demonstrate teeth with a mixed ecto/endodermal origin. Despite the enamel epithelia having a different embryonic source, oral teeth in the axolotl display striking developmental uniformities and are otherwise identical. This suggests a dominant role for the neural crest mesenchyme over epithelia in tooth initiation and, from an evolutionary point of view, that an essential factor in teeth evolution was the odontogenic capacity of neural crest cells, regardless of possible ‘outside-in’11 or ‘inside-out’12 influx of the epithelium.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Romer, A. S. The Vertebrate Body (Saunders, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kardong, K. V. Vertebrates. Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution (Brown, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chai, Y. et al. Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. Development 127, 1671–1679 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tucker, A. & Sharpe, P. The cutting-edge of mammalian development: how the embryo makes teeth. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 499–508 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pispa, J. & Thesleff, I. Mechanisms of ectodermal organogenesis. Dev. Biol. 262, 195–205 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stock, D. W. The genetic basis of modularity in the development and evolution of the vertebrate dentition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 356, 1633–1653 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Janvier, P. Early Vertebrates (Oxford Univ. Press, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huysseune, A., Van der Heyden, C., Verreijdt, L., Wautier, K. & Van Damme, N. Fish dentitions as paradigms for odontogenic questions. Connect. Tissue Res. 43, 98–102 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sire, J. Y., Davit-Beal, T., Delgado, S., Van Der Heyden, C. & Huysseune, A. First-generation teeth in nonmammalian lineages: evidence for a conserved ancestral character? Microsc. Res. Tech. 59, 408–434 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dickinson, A. J. & Sive, H. Development of the primary mouth in Xenopus laevis . Dev. Biol. 295, 700–713 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reif, W.-E. Evolution of dermal skeleton and dentition in vertebrates: the odontode-regulation theory. Evol. Biol. 15, 287–368 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, M. M. & Coates, M. I. in Major Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution (ed. Ahlberg, P. E.) 223–240 (Taylor and Francis, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, M. M. & Johanson, Z. Separate evolutionary origins of teeth from evidence in fossil jawed vertebrates. Science 299, 1235–1236 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chibon, P. Analyse expérimentale de la régionalisation et des capacités morphogénétiques de la crete neurale chez l'Amphibien Urodéle Pleurodeles waltlii Michah. Mem. Soc. Zool. Fr. 36, 1–107 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jackman, W. R., Draper, B. W. & Stock, D. W. Fgf signaling is required for zebrafish tooth development. Dev. Biol. 274, 139–157 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hall, B. K. The Neural Crest in Development and Evolution (Springer, 1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. de Beer, G. R. The differentiation of neural crest cells into visceral cartilages and odontoblasts in Amblystoma, and re-examination of the germ-layer theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 134, 377–398 (1947)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adams, A. E. An experimental study of the development of the mouth in the amphibian embryo. J. Exp. Zool. 40, 311–379 (1924)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Imai, H., Osumi, N. & Eto, K. Contribution of foregut endoderm to tooth initiation of mandibular incisor in rat embryos. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 106 (Suppl. 1). 19–23 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharpe, P. T. Homeobox genes and orofacial development. Connect. Tissue Res. 32, 17–25 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barlow, L. A. & Northcutt, R. G. Embryonic origin of amphibian taste buds. Dev. Biol. 169, 273–285 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sobkow, L., Epperlein, H. H., Herklotz, S., Straube, W. L. & Tanaka, E. M. A germline GFP transgenic axolotl and its use to track cell fate: dual origin of the fin mesenchyme during development and the fate of blood cells during regeneration. Dev. Biol. 290, 386–397 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barlow, L. A. & Northcutt, R. G. Taste buds develop autonomously from endoderm without induction by cephalic neural crest or paraxial mesoderm. Development 124, 949–957 (1997)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, M. M. & Coates, M. I. Evolutionary origins of the vertebrate dentition: phylogenetic patterns and developmental evolution. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 106 (Suppl. 1). 482–500 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reiss, J. O. Early development of chondrocranium in the tailed frog Ascaphus truei (Amphibia: Anura): implications for anuran palatoquadrate homologies. J. Morphol. 231, 63–100 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Debiais-Thibaud, M. et al. Development of oral and pharyngeal teeth in the medaka (Oryzias latipes): comparison of morphology and expression of eve1 gene. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 308, 693–708 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fraser, G. J., Graham, A. & Smith, M. M. Conserved deployment of genes during odontogenesis across osteichthyans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 2311–2317 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, M. M. Vertebrate dentitions at the origin of jaws: when and how pattern evolved. Evol. Dev. 5, 394–413 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitsiadis, T. A., Caton, J. & Cobourne, M. Waking-up the sleeping beauty: recovery of the ancestral bird odontogenic program. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 306, 227–233 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cerny, R. et al. Combined intrinsic and extrinsic influences pattern cranial neural crest migration and pharyngeal arch morphogenesis in axolotl. Dev. Biol. 266, 252–269 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Epperlein, H. H., Meulemans, D., Bronner-Fraser, M., Steinbeisser, H. & Selleck, M. A. Analysis of cranial neural crest migratory pathways in axolotl using cell markers and transplantation. Development 127, 2751–2761 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cerny, R. et al. Developmental origins and evolution of jaws: new interpretation of “maxillary” and “mandibular”. Dev. Biol. 276, 225–236 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank E. Tanaka and H. Andreas for supplying us with GFP axolotl embryos, L. Mchedlishvili for technical advice and O. Sebesta for help with confocal microscopy. We are grateful to M. Bronner–Fraser, R. Ericsson, D. Meulemans Medeiros, L. Olsson, P. D. Polly, D. W. Stock and A. Tucker for comments on the manuscript. Grants from the Ministry of Youth, Education and Sport of the Czech Republic (MSMT 0021620828), SMWK (Dresden) and COST Action B23 ‘Oral facial development and regeneration’ are gratefully acknowledged.

Author Contributions Tissue grafting was carried out in the laboratory of H.-H.E., who also helped with initial experiments. V.S. made transplantations and performed sectioning and image analyses as his Master’s thesis under the supervision of R.C., who also designed the initial experiments and wrote the manuscript. R.C. and I.H. planned the study and interpreted the results, I.H. made statistical analyses and helped in writing the manuscript, and all authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Charles University in Prague, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic,

    Vladimír Soukup, Ivan Horácek & Robert Cerny

  2. Department of Anatomy, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany,

    Hans-Henning Epperlein

Authors

  1. Vladimír Soukup

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hans-Henning Epperlein

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ivan Horácek

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert Cerny

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Cerny.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information 1

This file contains Supplementary Figures S1-S6 and Supplimentary Video Legend. (PDF 6487 kb)

Supplementary Information 2

This file contains Supplementary Tables S1-S4. (PDF 168 kb)

Supplementary Video 1

This file contains a Supplementary Video file showing a stack of optic deconvoluted layers through 20 µm thick cryostat section from an embryo after receiving both GFP ECT graft and DiI END injection. (AVI 6669 kb)

PowerPoint slides

About this article

Cite this article

Soukup, V., Epperlein, HH., Horácek, I. et al. Dual epithelial origin of vertebrate oral teeth. Nature 455, 795–798 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07304

Download citation

  • Received: 09 January 2008

  • Accepted: 29 July 2008

  • Published: 14 September 2008

  • Issue Date: 09 October 2008

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07304

Editorial Summary

The evolution of teeth: word of mouth

The classical view of the evolution of vertebrate teeth is the 'outside-in' model, in which the oral cavity and oral teeth arise from the ectoderm by invagination. A study of transgenic axolotls (a type of salamander) now suggests that the picture is more complicated than that. Fate mapping of cells in the embryo reveals that oral teeth are derived from both ectoderm and endoderm: some even have a mixed ecto/endodermal origin. This implies a dominant role for neural crest mesenchyme over epithelia in tooth formation. The evolutionary implication is that the tooth-forming capacity of neural crest cells was the essential factor for teeth evolution, regardless of the 'outside-in' and 'inside-out' manoeuvres of the epithelium.

Associated content