nature.com

Trends in the exploitation of novel drug targets - Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

  • ️Schiöth, Helgi B.
  • ️Mon Aug 01 2011
  • Analysis
  • Published: 01 August 2011

Nature Reviews Drug Discovery volume 10, pages 579–590 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Key Points

  • Currently marketed drugs mediate their effects via only a limited number of molecular targets. The recent trends in drug development were analysed by extensively matching drugs with drug targets and correlating these with drug approval dates.

  • We have identified 435 effect-mediating targets that were encoded by single positions on the human genome.

  • We have also observed a steady rate of introduction of new drugs. Furthermore, in our data set there has been no substantial decrease in the number of new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration each year.

  • On average, approximately 18 new drugs that act on targets that are encoded by the human genome are approved for the US market every year. The majority of new drugs target previously exploited structures that are encoded by the human genome.

  • On average, approximately 4.3 novel target drugs (NTDs) — that is, new drugs that target a previously unexploited molecular target that is encoded by the human genome — are approved for the US market every year.

  • Our drug–target network analysis shows a connection between the majority of drugs that form a giant interconnected network that we have termed the 'giant component'. However, NTDs have a greater tendency to be disconnected from the giant component and form small isolated networks. These smaller networks are of particular interest as they not only represent novel drug targets but also often represent new molecular mechanisms for treatment.

Abstract

The discovery and exploitation of new drug targets is a key focus for both the pharmaceutical industry and academic biomedical research. To provide an insight into trends in the exploitation of new drug targets, we have analysed the drugs that were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration during the past three decades and examined the interactions of these drugs with therapeutic targets that are encoded by the human genome, using the DrugBank database and extensive manual curation. We have identified 435 effect-mediating drug targets in the human genome, which are modulated by 989 unique drugs, through 2,242 drug–target interactions. We also analyse trends in the introduction of drugs that modulate previously unexploited targets, and discuss the network pharmacology of the drugs in our data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goodman, L. S., Gilman, A., Hardman, J. G., Gilman, A. G. & Limbird, L. E. Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 9th edn (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drews, J. Genomic sciences and the medicine of tomorrow. Nature Biotech. 14, 1516–1518 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hopkins, A. L. & Groom, C. R. The druggable genome. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 727–730 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Imming, P., Sinning, C. & Meyer, A. Drugs, their targets and the nature and number of drug targets. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 821–834 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Overington, J. P., Al-Lazikani, B. & Hopkins, A. L. How many drug targets are there? Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 993–996 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wishart, D. S. et al. DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D901–D906 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wishart, D. S. et al. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D668–D672 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Knox, C. et al. DrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D1035–D1041 (2011). This paper describes the most recent version of the DrugBank database, which is one of the most important sources of information on drugs and drug targets.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yildirim, M. A., Goh, K. I., Cusick, M. E., Barabasi, A. L. & Vidal, M. Drug–target network. Nature Biotech. 25, 1119–1126 (2007). This was one of the first papers to present a functional view on drug–target interactions by illustrating them as networks. This paper also integrates and analyses drug targets in the context of disease genetics and protein–protein interactomics.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stegmeier, F., Warmuth, M., Sellers, W. R. & Dorsch, M. Targeted cancer therapies in the twenty-first century: lessons from imatinib. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 87, 543–552 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lagerstrom, M. C. & Schioth, H. B. Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 339–357 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardie, D. G. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the metabolic syndrome and in heart disease. FEBS Lett. 582, 81–89 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu, M. et al. The analysis of the drug–targets based on the topological properties in the human protein–protein interaction network. J. Drug Target. 17, 524–532 (2009). This paper uses topological methodology to analyse the properties of drug targets in the context of protein–protein interaction networks. This information is then used for target prediction.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hopkins, A. L. Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. Nature Chem. Biol. 4, 682–690 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paul, S. M. et al. How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 203–214 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaitin, K. I. Deconstructing the drug development process: the new face of innovation. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 87, 356–361 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Drews, J. Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science 287, 1960–1964 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank J. Weigelt, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, for providing valuable comments on an early version of the manuscript. These studies were supported by the Swedish Research Council, the Novo Nordisk Foundation and the Swedish Brain Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, Functional Pharmacology, Uppsala University, Uppsala Biomedical Center, 75124, Uppsala, Sweden

    Mathias Rask-Andersen, Markus Sällman Almén & Helgi B. Schiöth

  2. Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala Biomedical Center, BOX 593, 75124, Uppsala, Sweden

    Helgi B. Schiöth

Authors

  1. Mathias Rask-Andersen

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Sällman Almén

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Helgi B. Schiöth

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helgi B. Schiöth.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Related links

About this article

Cite this article

Rask-Andersen, M., Almén, M. & Schiöth, H. Trends in the exploitation of novel drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10, 579–590 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3478

Download citation

  • Published: 01 August 2011

  • Issue Date: August 2011

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3478

This article is cited by