Insulators: exploiting transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms - Nature Reviews Genetics
- ️Felsenfeld, Gary
- ️Tue Aug 15 2006
Bownes, M. Preferential insertion of P elements into genes expressed in the germ-line of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Gen. Genet. 222, 457–460 (1990).
Sun, F. L. & Elgin, S. C. Putting boundaries on silence. Cell 99, 459–462 (1999).
Geyer, P. K., Spana, C. & Corces, V. G. On the molecular mechanism of gypsy-induced mutations at the yellow locus of Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 5, 2657–2662 (1986).
Pai, C. Y., Lei, E. P., Ghosh, D. & Corces, V. G. The centrosomal protein CP190 is a component of the gypsy chromatin insulator. Mol. Cell 16, 737–748 (2004).
Capelson, M. & Corces, V. G. The ubiquitin ligase dTopors directs the nuclear organization of a chromatin insulator. Mol. Cell 20, 105–116 (2005).
Gerasimova, T. I. & Corces, V. G. Polycomb and trithorax group proteins mediate the function of a chromatin insulator. Cell 92, 511–521 (1998).
Gerasimova, T. I., Byrd, K. & Corces, V. G. A chromatin insulator determines the nuclear localization of DNA. Mol. Cell 6, 1025–1035 (2000). This article provides the first clear demonstration that an insertion of the Su(Hw)– gypsy enhancer-blocking element targets the chromatin fibre to insulator bodies.
Xu, Q., Li, M., Adams, J. & Cai, H. N. Nuclear location of a chromatin insulator in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Cell Sci. 117, 1025–1032 (2004).
Capelson, M. & Corces, V. G. SUMO conjugation attenuates the activity of the gypsy chromatin insulator. EMBO J. 25, 1906–1914 (2006).
Kellum, R. & Schedl, P. A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains. Cell 64, 941–950 (1991).
Kellum, R. & Schedl, P. A group of scs elements function as domain boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 2424–2431 (1992).
Gaszner, M., Vazquez, J. & Schedl, P. The Zw5 protein, a component of the scs chromatin domain boundary, is able to block enhancer–promoter interaction. Genes Dev. 13, 2098–2107 (1999).
Zhao, K., Hart, C. M. & Laemmli, U. K. Visualization of chromosomal domains with boundary element-associated factor BEAF-32. Cell 81, 879–889 (1995).
Hart, C. M., Zhao, K. & Laemmli, U. K. The scs′ boundary element: characterization of boundary element-associated factors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 999–1009 (1997).
Blanton, J., Gaszner, M. & Schedl, P. Protein:protein interactions and the pairing of boundary elements in vivo. Genes Dev. 17, 664–675 (2003).
Chung, J. H., Whiteley, M. & Felsenfeld, G. A 5′ element of the chicken β-globin domain serves as an insulator in human erythroid cells and protects against position effect in Drosophila. Cell 74, 505–514 (1993).
Pikaart, M. J., Recillas-Targa, F. & Felsenfeld, G. Loss of transcriptional activity of a transgene is accompanied by DNA methylation and histone deacetylation and is prevented by insulators. Genes Dev. 12, 2852–2862 (1998).
Chung, J. H., Bell, A. C. & Felsenfeld, G. Characterization of the chicken β-globin insulator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 575–580 (1997).
Bell, A. C., West, A. G. & Felsenfeld, G. The protein CTCF is required for the enhancer blocking activity of vertebrate insulators. Cell 98, 387–396 (1999).
Bell, A. C. & Felsenfeld, G. Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene. Nature 405, 482–485 (2000). References 20–22 shows that the imprinted expression of the Igf2/H19 locus is controlled by DNA-methylation-regulated binding of the CTCF enhancer-blocking protein.
Hark, A. T. et al. CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus. Nature 405, 486–489 (2000).
Kanduri, C. et al. The 5′ flank of mouse H19 in an unusual chromatin conformation unidirectionally blocks enhancer–promoter communication. Curr. Biol. 10, 449–457 (2000).
Farrell, C. M., West, A. G. & Felsenfeld, G. Conserved CTCF insulator elements flank the mouse and human β-globin loci. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 3820–3831 (2002).
Filippova, G. N. et al. CTCF-binding sites flank CTG/CAG repeats and form a methylation-sensitive insulator at the DM1 locus. Nature Genet. 28, 335–343 (2001).
Chao, W., Huynh, K. D., Spencer, R. J., Davidow, L. S. & Lee, J. T. CTCF, a candidate trans-acting factor for X-inactivation choice. Science 295, 345–347 (2002).
Magdinier, F., Yusufzai, T. M. & Felsenfeld, G. Both CTCF-dependent and -independent insulators are found between the mouse T cell receptor α and Dad1 genes. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 25381–25389 (2004).
Yusufzai, T. M., Tagami, H., Nakatani, Y. & Felsenfeld, G. CTCF tethers an insulator to subnuclear sites, suggesting shared insulator mechanisms across species. Mol. Cell 13, 291–298 (2004). The most comprehensive attempt at understanding the molecular mechanism of CTCF-mediated enhancer blocking. It concludes that models that are based on chromatin loop formation, which were originally developed on the basis of studies of Su(Hw) in Drosophila , might provide an explanation.
Courey, A. J., Plon, S. E. & Wang, J. C. The use of psoralen-modified DNA to probe the mechanism of enhancer action. Cell 45, 567–574 (1986).
Plon, S. E. & Wang, J. C. Transcription of the human β-globin gene is stimulated by an SV40 enhancer to which it is physically linked but topologically uncoupled. Cell 45, 575–580 (1986).
Liu, Y., Bondarenko, V., Ninfa, A. & Studitsky, V. M. DNA supercoiling allows enhancer action over a large distance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14883–14888 (2001).
Bondarenko, V. A., Jiang, Y. I. & Studitsky, V. M. Rationally designed insulator-like elements can block enhancer action in vitro. EMBO J. 22, 4728–4737 (2003).
Ameres, S. L. et al. Inducible DNA-loop formation blocks transcriptional activation by an SV40 enhancer. EMBO J. 24, 358–367 (2005).
Patrinos, G. P. et al. Multiple interactions between regulatory regions are required to stabilize an active chromatin hub. Genes Dev. 18, 1495–1509 (2004).
Osborne, C. S. et al. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nature Genet. 36, 1065–1071 (2004).
Jackson, D. A., Iborra, F. J., Manders, E. M. & Cook, P. R. Numbers and organization of RNA polymerases, nascent transcripts, and transcription units in HeLa nuclei. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1523–1536 (1998).
Spilianakis, C. G., Lalioti, M. D., Town, T., Lee, G. R. & Flavell, R. A. Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci. Nature 435, 637–645 (2005).
Ling, J. Q. et al. CTCF mediates interchromosomal colocalization between Igf2/H19 and Wsb1/Nf1. Science 312, 269–272 (2006). This article demonstrates that CTCF protein is necessary to maintain interchromosomal interactions between Igf2/H19 and Wsb1/Nf1.
West, A. G. & Fraser, P. Remote control of gene transcription. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, R101–R111 (2005).
Ashe, H. L., Monks, J., Wijgerde, M., Fraser, P. & Proudfoot, N. J. Intergenic transcription and transinduction of the human β-globin locus. Genes Dev. 11, 2494–2509 (1997).
Kong, S., Bohl, D., Li, C. & Tuan, D. Transcription of the HS2 enhancer toward a cis-linked gene is independent of the orientation, position, and distance of the enhancer relative to the gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3955–3965 (1997).
West, A. G., Gaszner, M. & Felsenfeld, G. Insulators: many functions, many mechanisms. Genes Dev. 16, 271–288 (2002).
Morcillo, P., Rosen, C. & Dorsett, D. Genes regulating the remote wing margin enhancer in the Drosophila cut locus. Genetics 144, 1143–1154 (1996).
Morcillo, P., Rosen, C., Baylies, M. K. & Dorsett, D. Chip, a widely expressed chromosomal protein required for segmentation and activity of a remote wing margin enhancer in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 11, 2729–2740 (1997).
Zhao, H. & Dean, A. An insulator blocks spreading of histone acetylation and interferes with RNA polymerase II transfer between an enhancer and gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 4903–4919 (2004).
Scott, K. C., Taubman, A. D. & Geyer, P. K. Enhancer blocking by the Drosophila gypsy insulator depends upon insulator anatomy and enhancer strength. Genetics 153, 787–798 (1999).
Cai, H. N. & Shen, P. Effects of cis arrangement of chromatin insulators on enhancer-blocking activity. Science 291, 493–495 (2001).
Muravyova, E. et al. Loss of insulator activity by paired Su(Hw) chromatin insulators. Science 291, 495–498 (2001).
Kuhn, E. J., Viering, M. M., Rhodes, K. M. & Geyer, P. K. A test of insulator interactions in Drosophila. EMBO J. 22, 2463–2471 (2003).
Savitskaya, E. et al. Study of long-distance functional interactions between Su(Hw) insulators that can regulate enhancer–promoter communication in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 754–761 (2006).
Yu, W. et al. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation regulates CTCF-dependent chromatin insulation. Nature Genet. 36, 1105–1110 (2004).
Kuzmin, I. et al. Transcriptional regulator CTCF controls human interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase 2 promoter. J. Mol. Biol. 346, 411–422 (2005).
Filippova, G. N. et al. An exceptionally conserved transcriptional repressor, CTCF, employs different combinations of zinc fingers to bind diverged promoter sequences of avian and mammalian c-myc oncogenes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2802–2813 (1996).
Grewal, S. I. & Rice, J. C. Regulation of heterochromatin by histone methylation and small RNAs. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 230–238 (2004).
Volpe, T. A. et al. Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science 297, 1833–1837 (2002).
Jia, S., Noma, K. & Grewal, S. I. RNAi-independent heterochromatin nucleation by the stress-activated ATF/CREB family proteins. Science 304, 1971–1976 (2004).
Rusche, L. N., Kirchmaier, A. L. & Rine, J. The establishment, inheritance, and function of silenced chromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72, 481–516 (2003).
Bi, X. & Broach, J. R. UASrpg can function as a heterochromatin boundary element in yeast. Genes Dev. 13, 1089–1101 (1999).
Oki, M., Valenzuela, L., Chiba, T., Ito, T. & Kamakaka, R. T. Barrier proteins remodel and modify chromatin to restrict silenced domains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 1956–1967 (2004).
Bi, X., Yu, Q., Sandmeier, J. J. & Zou, Y. Formation of boundaries of transcriptionally silent chromatin by nucleosome-excluding structures. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 2118–2131 (2004).
Hebbes, T. R., Clayton, A. L., Thorne, A. W. & Crane-Robinson, C. Core histone hyperacetylation co-maps with generalized DNase I sensitivity in the chicken β-globin chromosomal domain. EMBO J. 13, 1823–1830 (1994).
Recillas-Targa, F. et al. Position-effect protection and enhancer blocking by the chicken β-globin insulator are separable activities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 6883–6888 (2002).
Litt, M. D., Simpson, M., Recillas-Targa, F., Prioleau, M. N. & Felsenfeld, G. Transitions in histone acetylation reveal boundaries of three separately regulated neighboring loci. EMBO J. 20, 2224–2235 (2001).
Litt, M. D., Simpson, M., Gaszner, M., Allis, C. D. & Felsenfeld, G. Correlation between histone lysine methylation and developmental changes at the chicken β-globin locus. Science 293, 2453–2455 (2001).
West, A. G., Huang, S., Gaszner, M., Litt, M. D. & Felsenfeld, G. Recruitment of histone modifications by USF proteins at a vertebrate barrier element. Mol. Cell 16, 453–463 (2004). This article demonstrates that direct recruitment of histone acetylases and H3K4-specific histone methyltransferases is a necessary but not sufficient component of the cHS4 vertebrate barrier element.
Ishii, K., Arib, G., Lin, C., Van Houwe, G. & Laemmli, U. K. Chromatin boundaries in budding yeast: the nuclear pore connection. Cell 109, 551–562 (2002).
Ishii, K. & Laemmli, U. K. Structural and dynamic functions establish chromatin domains. Mol. Cell 11, 237–248 (2003).
Casolari, J. M. et al. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 117, 427–439 (2004).
Roseman, R. R., Pirrotta, V. & Geyer, P. K. The su(Hw) protein insulates expression of the Drosophila melanogaster white gene from chromosomal position-effects. EMBO J. 12, 435–442 (1993).
Ciavatta, D., Kalantry, S., Magnuson, T. & Smithies, O. A DNA insulator prevents repression of a targeted X-linked transgene but not its random or imprinted X inactivation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9958–9963 (2006).
Filippova, G. N. et al. Boundaries between chromosomal domains of X inactivation and escape bind CTCF and lack CpG methylation during early development. Dev. Cell 8, 31–42 (2005).
Cho, D. H. et al. Antisense transcription and heterochromatin at the DM1 CTG repeats are constrained by CTCF. Mol. Cell 20, 483–489 (2005).
Lieb, J. D., Liu, X., Botstein, D. & Brown, P. O. Promoter-specific binding of Rap1 revealed by genome-wide maps of protein–DNA association. Nature Genet. 28, 327–334 (2001).
Donze, D., Adams, C. R., Rine, J. & Kamakaka, R. T. The boundaries of the silenced HMR domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 13, 698–708 (1999).
Donze, D. & Kamakaka, R. T. RNA polymerase III and RNA polymerase II promoter complexes are heterochromatin barriers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 20, 520–531 (2001).
Oki, M. & Kamakaka, R. T. Barrier function at HMR. Mol. Cell 19, 707–716 (2005). This paper describes the genetic dissection of the barrier element at the centromere-distal end of HMR in S. cerevisiae.
Partridge, J. F., Borgstrom, B. & Allshire, R. C. Distinct protein interaction domains and protein spreading in a complex centromere. Genes Dev. 14, 783–791 (2000).
Cam, H. P. et al. Comprehensive analysis of heterochromatin- and RNAi-mediated epigenetic control of the fission yeast genome. Nature Genet. 37, 809–819 (2005).
Scott, K. C., Merrett, S. L. & Willard, H. F. A heterochromatin barrier partitions the fission yeast centromere into discrete chromatin domains. Curr. Biol. 16, 119–129 (2006).
Willoughby, D. A., Vilalta, A. & Oshima, R. G. An Alu element from the K18 gene confers position-independent expression in transgenic mice. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 759–768 (2000).
Noma, K., Cam, H. P., Maraia, R. J. & Grewal, S. I. A role for TFIIIC transcription factor complex in genome organization. Cell 125, 859–872 (2006). This paper provides an example of barrier activity achieved by targeting the chromatin fibre to a subnuclear compartment that is unfavourable for heterochromatin formation.
Wallrath, L. L. & Elgin, S. C. Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 9, 1263–1277 (1995).
Sun, F. L. et al. The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster: interspersed euchromatic and heterochromatic domains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5340–5345 (2000).
Sun, F. L. et al. cis-Acting determinants of heterochromatin formation on Drosophila melanogaster chromosome four. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 8210–8220 (2004). This paper focuses on the chromatin organization of the fourth chromosome in Drosophila and describes situations in which transition between heterochromatin and euchromatin is not regulated by barrier elements.
Kimura, A. & Horikoshi, M. Partition of distinct chromosomal regions: negotiable border and fixed border. Genes Cells 9, 499–508 (2004).