link.springer.com

Introduction and Historical Overview

  • Alexander, Joshua (2012). Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, Robert (1999). ‘Self-evidence’, Philosophical Perspectives 13: 205–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, Robert (2008). ‘Intuition, Inference and Rational Disagreement in Ethics’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11: 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1946). ‘Other Minds’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supplementary volume 20: 148–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1957). ‘A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume 57: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A.J. (1936). Language, Truth and Logic. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baz, Avner (2012). When Words Are Called For: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beebee, Helen and Julian Dodd (eds) (2005). Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Karen (2011). ‘Truthmaking and Case-making’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83: 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, John (1988). The Reality of Numbers: A Physicalist’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Simon (1984). Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddon-Mitchell, David and Robert Nola (eds) (2009). Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, Herman (2012). Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf (1928). The Logical Structure of the World; Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, translated by Rolf A. George. Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf (1932). ‘The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language’, translated by Arthur Pap, in A.J. Ayer (1959) (ed), Logical Positivism. New York: Free Press, pp. 60–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, David J. (2012). Constructing the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, David J. (2015). ‘Why Isn’t There More Progress in Philosophy?’, Philosophy 90:3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, James and Jack Reynolds (2011). Analytic versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy. McGill: Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick, M. (1957). Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick M. (1976). Person and Object: A Metaphysical Study. London: George Allen and Un win.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1988). Language and Problems of Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, David (2000). ‘Diachronic Coherence versus Epistemic Impartiality’, Philosophical Review 109: 349–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudnoff, Elijah (2013). Intuition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conee, Earl (2001). ‘Comments on Bill Lycan’s “Moore Against the New Skeptics’”, Philosophical Studies 103: 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, Fabrice and Benjamin Schnieder (2012). Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, Simon (2010). ‘Survey-driven Romanticism’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1:275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Chris (2010). Introduction to Philosophical Methods. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, Norman (1979). ‘Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics’, Journal of Philosophy 76: 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald (1975). ‘Thought and Talk’, in Samuel Guttenplan (ed), Mind and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel C. (2013). Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaul, Michael DePaul and William Ramsey (eds) (1998). Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, Fred (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael (1973). Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael (1978). ‘The Justification of Deduction’, in his Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth Press, pp. 290–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, R.G. (1970). ‘Identity of Properties and The Definition of “Good”’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48: 360–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyke, Heather (2007). Metaphysics and the Representational Fallacy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Paul (1949). ‘Bertrand Russell’s Doubts about Induction’, Mind 58: 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enç, Berent (2005). How We Act: Causes, Reasons and Intentions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, Herbert and Grover Maxwell (1961). ‘Why Ordinary Language Needs Reforming’, Journal of Philosophy 58: 488–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, James H. (1984). Principles of Philosophical Reasoning. Totowa: New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry A. (1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, Richard (1983). ‘Epistemic Conservatism’, Philosophical Studies 43: 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, John F. (1987). ‘Truthmaker’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65: 188–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frappier, Melanie, Letitia Meynell and James Robert Brown (eds) (2012) Thought Experiments in Science, Philosophy, and the Arts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob (1879). Begriffsschrift, edited and translated by T.W. Bynum as Conceptual Notation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob (1884). The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number, translated by J.L. Austin, 2nd edition, 1974. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, David (1967). ‘Morality and Advantage’, Philosophical Review 76: 460–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendler, Tamar Szabo (2010). Intuition, Imagination, and Philosophical Methodology: Selected Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson (1955). Fact, Fiction andForecast. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. (1957). ‘Meaning’, The Philosophical Review 66: 377–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. (1968). ‘Utterer’s Meaning, Sentence Meaning and WordMeaning’, Foundations of Language 4: 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. (1975). ‘Logic and Conversation’, in Peter Cole, John P. Kimball and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics volume 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. (1978). ‘Further Notes on Logic and Conversation’, in Peter Cole (ed), Syntax and Semantics Volume 9: Pragmatics. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. (1981). ‘Presupposition and Conversational Implicature’, in Peter Cole (ed), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. and P.F. Strawson (1956). ‘In Defense of a Dogma’, The Philosophical Review 65: 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim, Patrick, Gary Mar and Paul St Denis (1998). The Philosophical Computer: Exploratory Essays in Philosophical Computer Modeling. Massachusetts, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutting, Gary (2009). What Philosophers Know: Case Studies in Recent Analytic Philosophy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, P.M.S. (1996). Wittgenstein’s Place inTwentieth Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanfling, Oswald (2000). Philosophy and Ordinary Language: The Bent and Genius of Our Tongue. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert (1965). ‘The Inference to the Best Explanation’, Philosophical Review 74: 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert (1973). Thought Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert (1986). Changein View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, W.D. (1977). ‘Review of Mark Steiner, Mathematical Knowledge’, journal of Philosophy 74: 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haug, Matthew C. (2014). Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, John (2003). From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G. (1945). ‘Studies in the Logic of Confirmation’, Mind 54: 1–26 and 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G. (1950). ‘Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 41: 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko (1970). ‘The Semantics of Modal Notions and the Indeterminacy of Ontology’, Synthese 21: 408–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, Joachim and Thomas Grundmann (eds) (2012) Experimental Philosophy and Its Critics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, Paul (2013). Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, Colin and Peter Urbach (1989). Scientific Reasoning: the Bayesian Approach, 3rd edition 2005. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huemer, Michael (1999). ‘The Problem of Memory Knowledge’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80: 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Frank (1982). ‘Epiphenomenal Qualia’, Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Frank (1998). From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, C.S. (2008). ‘Modal Knowledge, Count erfactual Knowledge and the Role of Experience’, Philosophical Quarterly 58: 693–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Mark (1987). ‘Human Beings’, Journal of Philosophy 84: 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Simon (2009). ‘Review of Trenton Merricks, Truth and Ontology’, Philosophical Review 118: 273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Thomas and Sarah McGrath (2015). ‘Are There Any Successful Philosophical Arguments?’, in John-Christopher Keller (ed), Being, Freedom, and Method: Themes from van Inwagen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, Joshua and Shaun Nichols (eds) (2008). Experimental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith, Hilary (2012). ‘Is Philosophical Knowledge Possible?’, in Diego E. Machuca (ed), Disagreement and Skepticism. London: Routledge, pp. 260–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul (1972). ‘Naming and Necessity’, in Gilbert Harman and Donald Davidson (eds), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 253–355, 763–769.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kvanvig, Jonathan L. (1989). ‘Conservatism and Its Virtues’, Synthese 79: 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, C.H. (1942). ‘The Notion of Analysis in Moore’s Philosophy’, in P.A. Schilpp (ed), The Philosophy of G.E. Moore. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, pp. 321–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Joseph (2001). Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David (1968). ‘Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’, Journal of Philosophy 65: 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David (1986). On The Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David (2001). ‘Truthmaking and Difference-Making’, Nous, 35: 602–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, William G. (1975). ‘Occam’s Razor’, Metaphilosophy 6: 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, William G. (2013). ‘On Two Main Themes in Gutting’s What Philosophers Know’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 51: 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, Kevin (2008). ‘The Virtues of Epistemic Conservatism’, Synthese 164: 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, Kris (2011). ‘Trenton Merricks’, Truth and Ontology’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83: 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Michael (2007). ‘Memory and Epistemic Conservatism’, Synthese 157: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, J.M.E. (1908). ‘The Unreality of Time’, Mind 17: 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machery, Edouard and Elizabeth O’Neill (2014). Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, Norman (1949). ‘Defending Common Sense’, Philosophical Review 58: 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, Ruth Barcan (1967). ‘Essentialism in Modal Logic’, Nous 1: 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melia, Joseph (1995). ‘On What There’s Not’, Analysis 55: 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merricks, Trenton (2007). Truth and Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard (1973). ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik, and Patrick Suppes (eds), Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 221–242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.E. (1903). Principia Ethica, revised edition, 1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.E. (1925). ‘A Defence of Common Sense’, in J. H. Muirhead (ed), Contemporary British Philosophy, second series. London: George Allen and Unwin, pp. 193–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, Arne (1960). ‘Typology of Questionnaires Adapted to the Study of Ex-pressions with Closely Related Meanings’, Synthese 12: 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Jennifer, Valerie San Juan and Raymond A. Mar (2013). ‘Lay Denial of Knowledge for Justified True Beliefs’, Cognition 129: 652–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, John (1961). Philosophical Reasoning. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitot, Jean, Francisco J. Varela, Bernard Pachoud, and Jean-Michel Roy (1999). Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrinovich, Lewis and Patricia O’Neill (1996). ‘Influence of Wording and Framing Effects on Moral Intuitions’, Ethology and Sociobiology 17: 145–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Predelli, Stefano (2002). ‘Holmes’ and Holmes: A Millian Analysis of Names from Fiction’, Dialectica 56: 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pust, Joel (2001). ‘Against Explanationist Skepticism Regarding Philosophical Intuitions’, Philosophical Studies 106: 227–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary (1975). ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, in his Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–271.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1951). ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, Philosophical Review 60: 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1953). ‘Reference and Modality’, in From a Logical Point of View, 2nd edition. New York: Harper and Row, 1961, pp. 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1969a). ‘Epistemology Naturalized’, in his Epistemology Naturalized and Other Essays. Columbia: Columbia University Press, pp. 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1969b). ‘Natural Kinds’, in Epistemology Naturalized and Other Essays. Columbia: Columbia University Press, pp. 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1970). Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1974). ‘The Independence of Moral Theory’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48: 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, Georges (1983). ‘A Reason for Doubting the Existence of Consciousness’, in Richard J. Davidson, Gary E. Schwartz and D. H. Shapiro (eds), Consciousness and Self-Regulation. New York: Plenum, pp. 1–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Jack James Chase, James Williams and Edwin Mares (eds) (2010). Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, Steven (1992). ‘Understanding Synonyms without Knowing that They Are Synonyms’, Analysis 52: 224–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinard, Susanna (2013). ‘Why Philosophy Can Overturn Common Sense’, in Tamar Szabo Gendler and John Hawthorne (eds), Oxford Studies in Epistemology volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185–212.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1967). The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand (1903). Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand (1905). ‘On Denoting’, Mind 14: 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand (1911). The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand (1914). Our Knowledge of the External World as a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, Gilbert (1949). The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, Gilbert (1954). Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, Thomas (2002). ‘Rawls on justification’, in Samuel Freeman (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–167.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, Jonathan (2008). ‘Truth-maker Commitments’, Philosophical Studies 141: 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Stewart (1991). Foundations without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sider, Theodore (2005). Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Hugh J. and Donn Welton (eds) (1988). Postmodernism and Continental Philosophy. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Peter (2000). ‘The Four Phases of Philosophy: Brentano’s Theory and Austria’s History’, The Monist 83: 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, Brian (1996). Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Joel and Peter Sullivan (2011). Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott (2003a). Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, volume 1: The Dawn of Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott (2003b). Philosophy in the Twentieth Century volume 2: The Age of Meaning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Elliott (1988). Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, Roy (1992). Thought Experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stampe, Dennis A. (1977). ‘Toward a Causal Theory of Linguistic Representation’, in Peter French, Howard K. Wettstein, and T. E. Uehling (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, volume 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 42–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, C.L. (1944). Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stove, David (1991). The Plato Cult and Other Philosophical Follies. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P.F. (1950). ‘On Referring’, Mind 59: 320–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P.F. (1952). Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P.F. (1963). ‘Carnap’s Views on Constructed Systems versus Natural Languages in Analytic Philosophy’, in P.A. Schilpp (ed), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 503–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, Patrick (1968). ‘The Desirability of Formalization in Science’, Journal of Philosophy 65:651–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, Alfred (1933). ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in John Corcoran (ed), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, translated by J. H. Woodger, 2nd edition. Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 152–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, Judith (1971). ‘A Defense of Abortion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, Peter (2014). Empty Ideas: A Critique of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Cleve, James (1979). ‘Foundationalism, Epistemic Principles, and the Cartesian Circle’, Philosophical Review 88: 55–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Inwagen, Peter (2006). The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherson, Brian (2003). ‘What Good Are Counterexamples?’, Philosophical Studies 115: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Jonathan M., Shaun Nichols and Stephen Stich (2001). ‘Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions’, Philosophical Topics 29: 429–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Alfred North and Bertrand Russell (1910, 1912, 1913). Principia Mathematica, volumes 1–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, Kathleen V. (1988). Real People: Personal Identity without Thought Experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Timothy (2007a). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Timothy (2007b). ‘Philosophical Knowledge and Knowledge of Counterfactuals’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 74: 89–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations, translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar