brill.com

Cinema, Supernatural Archaeology, and the Hidden Human Past

  • ️Peter Hiscock
  • ️Sun Jan 01 2012
Online Publication Date:
01 Jan 2012

Abstract

Close analysis of modern movies reveals — yet archaeologists and historians have failed to understand — that the dominant representation of archaeological research and ancient human culture in mainstream cinema involves explorations of supernatural objects and events. Cinematic archaeology tends to be mythic rather than realistic in focus. Movies frequently present images of the human past that are pseudoarchaeological in the sense that these films tell the same stories as ‘alternative archaeology,’ even though they may not make an explicit claim to the truthfulness of the events depicted. This pattern is documented through a review of films employing the ancient astronaut model in which visiting aliens changed human development in the past, and through an examination of the work of writer/director Roland Emmerich who has specialized in those films. The cinematic history of these narratives is long, demonstrating that cinema does not merely reproduce popular pseudoarchaeological research, it has also contributed to the growth of these stories.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

  • Coppens Phillip & von Däniken Erich The Ancient Alien Question: A New Inquiry Into the Existence, Evidence, and Influence of Ancient Visitors 2011 New York New Page Books

  • Fagan Garrett G. Fagan Garrett G. “Diagnosing Pseudoarchaeology” Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public 2006a Abingdon Routledge 23 46

  • Fagan Garrett G. & Feder K.L. “Crusading Against Straw Men: An Alternative View of Alternative Archaeologies: Response to Holtorf (2005)” World Archaeology 2006 38 718 729

  • Gray T. Harrold F. & Eve R. “Educational Experience and Belief in Paranormal Phenomena” Cult Archaeology and Creationism: Understanding Pseudoscientific Beliefs about the Past 1987 Iowa City University of Iowa Press 21 33

  • Gresh Lois H. & Weinberg Robert Why did it have to be snakes? From Science to the Supernatural, the Many Mysteries of Indiana Jones 2008 New Jersey John Wiley and Sons

  • Hiscock Peter “Book Review: Box Office Archaeology: Refining Hollywood’s Portrayals of the Past by Julie Schablitsky” Australian Archaeology 2008 66 75 6

  • Hiscock Peter Lemaitre S. & Schall C. “Archaeology Threatens the World! Representations of Archaeologists in Cinema” How do the Media Represent Archaeology, What Is at Stake? 2009 Bruxelles Kineon 71 79

  • Morton Chris & Thomas Ceri Louise The Mystery of the Crystal Skulls: Unlocking the Secrets of the Past, Present, and Future 2002 New York Bear and Company

  • Noble V.E. Schalitsky J. “When the legend becomes fact. Reconciling Hollywood realism and archaeological realities” Box Office Archaeology: Refining Hollywood’s Portrayals of the Past 2007 Walnut Creek, California Left Coast Press 223 244

  • Peet Preston Underground!: The Disinformation Guide to Ancient Civilizations, Astonishing Archaeology and Hidden History 2005 New York Disinformation

  • Shohat E. Stam R. & Miller T. “Gender and Culture of Empire: Towards a Feminist Ethnography of the Cinema” Film and Theory: An Anthology 2000 Oxford Blackwell 669 696

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1738 332 19
Full Text Views 383 79 2
PDF Views & Downloads 555 168 5

Cinema, Supernatural Archaeology, and the Hidden Human Past

In: Numen

Online Publication Date:
01 Jan 2012

Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

Abstract

Close analysis of modern movies reveals — yet archaeologists and historians have failed to understand — that the dominant representation of archaeological research and ancient human culture in mainstream cinema involves explorations of supernatural objects and events. Cinematic archaeology tends to be mythic rather than realistic in focus. Movies frequently present images of the human past that are pseudoarchaeological in the sense that these films tell the same stories as ‘alternative archaeology,’ even though they may not make an explicit claim to the truthfulness of the events depicted. This pattern is documented through a review of films employing the ancient astronaut model in which visiting aliens changed human development in the past, and through an examination of the work of writer/director Roland Emmerich who has specialized in those films. The cinematic history of these narratives is long, demonstrating that cinema does not merely reproduce popular pseudoarchaeological research, it has also contributed to the growth of these stories.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1738 332 19
Full Text Views 383 79 2
PDF Views & Downloads 555 168 5