cambridge.org

Immigration after Brexit | National Institute Economic Review | Cambridge Core

  • ️Tue Mar 18 2025

Abstract

This paper examines the short and long-term impacts of the UK referendum on migration flows and migration policy. Even in the short term – before any policy change – the vote will affect migration flows directly and indirectly through both economic and other channels. Post Brexit, two key issues will need to be addressed. Will the UK preserve a substantial measure of preference for EU citizens in any new system? And will policy tilt in a liberal or restrictive direction?

Type

Research Articles

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

References

Goodwin, M. J. and Heath, O. (2016), ‘The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind? An aggregate-level analysis of the result’, forthcoming in Political Quarterly.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, A, Lalani, M., Mason, G., Rolfe, H. and Rosazza Bondibene, C. (2012), ‘Skilled immigration and strategically important skills in the UK economy’, Migration Advisory Committee.Google Scholar

Migration Advisory Committee (2016), Review of Tier 2: Balancing migrant selectivity, investment in skills and impacts on UK productivity and competitiveness, London: Migration Advisory Committee.Google Scholar

Office of National Statistics (2016), Labour Market Statistics, August.Google Scholar

Portes, J. (2016a), ‘Immigration, free movement and the UK Referendum’, National Institute Economic Review, 236, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rolfe, H. and Hudson-Sharp, N. (2016), ‘The impact of free movement on the labour market: case studies of hospitality, food processing and construction’, London: NIESR.Google Scholar

Vasilopoulou, S. (2016), ‘Explaining UK euroscepticism: freedom of movement, employment, welfare and the UK referendum’, University of York, Political Quarterly (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Wadsworth, J., Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G. and Van Reenen, J. (2016), ‘Brexit and the impact of immigration on the UK’, Brexit Analysis No. 5, London: Centre for Economic Performance.Google Scholar