How are evidence and policy conceptualised, and how do they connect? A qualitative systematic review of public policy literature
- ️Valérie Pattyn
- ️Mon Aug 01 2022
Acciai, C. and Capano, G. (2021) Policy instruments at work: a meta‐analysis of their applications, Public Administration, 99(1): 118–36. doi: 10.1111/padm.12673
Bacchi, C. (2000) Policy as discourse: what does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1): 45–57. doi: 10.1080/01596300050005493
Cairney, P. and Oliver, K. (2020) How should academics engage in policymaking to achieve impact? Political Studies Review, 18(2): 228–44. doi: 10.1177/1478929918807714
Caplan, N. (1979) The Two-communities theory and knowledge utilization, American Behavioral Scientist, 22(3): 459–70. doi: 10.1177/000276427902200308
Christensen, J. (2021) Expert knowledge and policymaking: a multi-disciplinary research agenda, Policy & Politics, 49(3): 455–71, doi: 10.1332/030557320X15898190680037.
Craft, J. and Howlett, M. (2013) The dual dynamics of policy advisory systems: The impact of externalization and politicization on policy advice. Policy and Society, 32(3): 187–97.
Dunlop, C.A. and Radaelli, C.M. (2020) Policy learning in comparative policy analysis, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, doi: 10.1080/13876988.2020.1762077.
Eagly, A.H. and Chaiken, S. (2007) The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude, Social Cognition, 25(5): 582–602. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R. (2010) Epistemological bricolage: how practitioners make sense of learning, Administration and Society, 39(4): 476–96. doi: 10.1177/0095399707301857
Gerring, J. (1999) What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences, Polity, 31(3): 357–93. doi: 10.2307/3235246
Gieryn, T.F. (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists, American Sociological Review, 48(6): 781–95. doi: 10.2307/2095325
Halligan, J. (1995) Policy advice and the public service, in B.G. Peters and D.J. Savoie (eds) Governance in a Changing Environment, Québec: Canadian Centre for Management Development, pp 138–72.
Howlett, M. and Tosun, J. (2018) Policy styles: a new approach, in M. Howlett and J. Tosun (eds) Policy Styles and Policy-Making. Exploring the Linkages, Abingdon: Routledge.
Innvaer, S., Vist, G., Trommald, M. and Oxman, A. (2002) Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7(4): 239–44. doi: 10.1258/135581902320432778
Landry, R., Amara, N. and Lamari, M. (2001) Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada, Research Policy, 30(2): 333–49. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0
Lindquist, E.A. (1990) The third community, policy inquiry, and social scientists, in S. Brooks and A. Gagnon (eds) Social Scientists, Policy, and the State, New York: Praeger, pp 21–51.
Liverani, M., Hawkins, B. and Parkhurst, J.O. (2013) Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy: a systematic review, PLoS ONE, 8(10): e77404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077404
MacKillop, E., Quarmby, S. and Downe, J. (2020) Does knowledge brokering facilitate evidence-based policy? A review of existing knowledge and an agenda for future research, Policy & Politics, 48(2): 335–53.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G. and Prisma Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, PLoS Medicine, 6(7): e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Moyson, S., Raaphorst, N., Groeneveld, S. and Van de Walle, S. (2017) Organizational socialization in public administration research: a systematic review and directions for future research, American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), doi: 10.1177/0275074017696160.
Neal, J.W., Neal, Z. and Brutzman, B. (2021) Defining brokers, intermediaries, and boundary spanners: a systematic review, Evidence & Policy, doi: 10.1332/174426420X16083745764324.
Newman, L., Rowley, J., Vander Hoorn, S., Wijesooriya, N.S., Unemo, M. and Low, N. (2015) Global estimates of the prevalence and incidence of four curable sexually transmitted infections in 2012 based on systematic review and global reporting, PLos One, 10(12): e0143304.
Nutley, S., Walter, I. and Davies, H.T. (2009) Promoting evidence-based practice: models and mechanisms from cross-sector review, Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5): 552–59. doi: 10.1177/1049731509335496
Oliver, K. and Boaz, A. (2019) Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations, Palgrave Communications, 5(60): 1–10. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0199-0
Oliver, K. and Cairney, P. (2019) The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics, Palgrave Communications, 5(21): 1–11.
Oliver, K., Innvaer, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J. and Thomas, J. (2014) A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers, BMC Health Services Research, 14(2): 1–12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-1
Pattyn, V., Blum, S., Fobé, E., Pekar-Milicevic, M. and Brans, M. (2019) Academic policy advice in Consensus-seeking countries: the cases of Belgium and Germany, International Review of Administrative Science, online first, doi: 10.1177/0020852319878780.
PytlikZillig, L.M. and Kimbrough, C. (2016) Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: are we there yet? in E. Shockley, T.M. Neal, L.M. PytlikZillig and B.H. Bornstein (eds) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust, Berlin: Springer, pp 17–47.
Riche, C., Aubin, D. and Moyson, S. (2021) Too much of a good thing? A systematic review about the conditions of learning in governance networks, European Policy Analysis, 7(1): 147–64. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1080
Strassheim, H. and Kettunen, P. (2014) When does evidence-based policy turn into policy-based evidence? Configurations, contexts and mechanisms, Evidence & Policy, 10(2): 259–77.
Strydom, W.F., Funke, N., Nienaber, S., Nortje, K. and Steyn, M. (2010) Evidence-based policymaking: a review, South African Journal of Science, 106(5–6): 17–24. doi: 10.4102/sajs.v106i5/6.249
Tenbensel, T. (2008) The role of evidence in policy: how the mix matters, Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Research Society for Public Management, Brisbane.
Tosun, J. and Workman, S. (2017) Struggle and triumph in fusing policy process and comparative research, in C.M. Weible and P.A. Sabatier (eds) Theories of the Policy Process, 4th edn, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp 329–62.
van der Heijden, J. and Kuhlmann, J. (2017) Studying incremental institutional change: a systematic and critical meta-review of the literature from 2005 to 2015, Policy Studies Journal, 45(3): 535–54. doi: 10.1111/psj.12191
Verweij, S. and Trell, E.M. (2019) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in spatial planning research and related disciplines: a systematic literature review of applications, Journal of Planning Literature, 34(3): 300–317. doi: 10.1177/0885412219841490