degruyter.com

Future perspectives of biopolymeric industry

  • ️Trinath Biswal
  • ️Sun Sep 01 2024

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editors Swati Sharma and Ashok Kumar Nadda for their guidance and review of this article before its publication.

  1. Research ethics: Design and writting of this article is completely original.

  2. Author contributions: The article is a single author article and everything is contributes by Trinath Biswal.

  3. Competing interests: No competeting of interest.

  4. Research funding: No funding for this work.

  5. Data availability: As per publisher policy.

References

1. Joseph, B, Krishnan, S, Sagarika, VK, Tharayil, A, Kalarikkal, N, Thomas, S. Bionanocomposites as industrial materials, current and future perspectives: a review. Emergent Mater 2020;3:711–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-020-00133-x.Search in Google Scholar

2. Andreeen, C, Steinbüchel, A. Recent developments in non-biodegradable biopolymers: precursors, production processes, and future perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2019;103:143–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9483-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Andrady, AL. Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull 2011;62:1596–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. do Sul, JAI, Costa, MF. The present and future of microplastic pollution in the marine environment. Environ Pollut 2014;185:352–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.036.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Rautela, R, Cameotra, SS. Role of biopolymers in industries: their prospective future applications. In: Environment and sustainable development. New Delhi: Springer; 2014:133–42 pp.10.1007/978-81-322-1166-2_9Search in Google Scholar

6. Liu, H, Kumar, V, Jia, L, Sarsaiya, S, Kumar, D, Juneja, A, et al.. Biopolymer poly-hydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production from apple industrial waste residues: a review. Chemosphere 2021;284:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131427.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Jones, OG, McClements, DJ. Functional biopolymer particles: design, fabrication, and applications. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2010;9:374–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00118.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Van de Velde, K, Kiekens, P. Biopolymers: overview of several properties and consequences on their applications. Polym Test 2002;21:433–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9418(01)00107-6.Search in Google Scholar

9. Yates, MR, Barlow, CY. Life cycle assessments of biodegradable, commercial biopolymers—a critical review. Resources. Conserv Recycl 2013;78:54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.06.010.Search in Google Scholar

10. Abe, MM, Martins, JR, Sanvezzo, PB, Macedo, JV, Branciforti, MC, Halley, P, et al.. Advantages and disadvantages of bioplastics production from starch and lignocellulosic components. Polymers 2021;13:2484–508. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13152484.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Mtibe, A, Motloung, MP, Bandyopadhyay, J, Ray, SS. Synthetic biopolymers and their composites: advantages and limitations—an overview. Macromol Rapid Commun 2021;42:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202100130.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Vinod, A, Sanjay, MR, Suchart, S, Jyotishkumar, P. Renewable and sustainable biobased materials: an assessment on biofibers, biofilms, biopolymers and biocomposites. J Clean Prod 2020;258:1–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120978.Search in Google Scholar

13. Biswal, T. Biopolymers for tissue engineering applications: a review. Mater Today Proc 2021;41:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.628.Search in Google Scholar

14. Khalil, HA, Yahya, EB, Jummaat, F, Adnan, AS, Olaiya, NG, Rizal, S, et al.. Biopolymers based aerogels: a review on revolutionary solutions for smart therapeutics delivery. Prog Mater Sci 2023;131:101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101014.Search in Google Scholar

15. Park, SB, Lih, E, Park, KS, Joung, YK, Han, DK. Biopolymer-based functional composites for medical applications. Prog Polym Sci 2017;68:77–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

16. Thombare, N, Kumar, S, Kumari, U, Sakare, P, Yogi, RK, Prasad, N, et al.. Shellac as a multifunctional biopolymer: a review on properties, applications, and future potential. Int J Biol Macromol 2022;215:203–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.090.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Goonoo, N, Bhaw‐Luximon, A, Bowlin, GL, Jhurry, D. An assessment of biopolymer‐and synthetic polymer‐based scaffolds for bone and vascular tissue engineering. Polym Int 2013;62:523–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.4474.Search in Google Scholar

18. Gowthaman, NSK, Lim, HN, Sreeraj, TR, Amalraj, A, Gopi, S. Advantages of biopolymers over synthetic polymers: social, economic, and environmental aspects. In: Biopolymers and their industrial applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2021, Chapter-15:351–72 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819240-5.00015-8Search in Google Scholar

19. Grujic, R, Vukic, M, Gojkovic, V. Application of biopolymers in the food industry. In: Advances in applications of industrial biomaterials. Cham: Springer; 2017:103–19 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-62767-0_6Search in Google Scholar

20. Gupta, I, Cherwoo, L, Bhatia, R, Setia, H. Biopolymers: implications and application in the food industry. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 2022;46:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102534.Search in Google Scholar

21. Younes, B. Classification, characterization, and the production processes of biopolymers used in the textiles industry. J Text Inst 2017;108:674–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2016.1180731.Search in Google Scholar

22. Bhullar, SK, Özsel, BK, Yadav, R, Kaur, G, Chintamaneni, M, Buttar, HS. Antibacterial activity of combination of synthetic and biopolymer non-woven structures. J Compl Integr Med 2015;12:289–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcim-2015-0027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Puertas-Bartolomé, M, Mora-Boza, A, García-Fernández, L. Emerging biofabrication techniques: a review on natural polymers for biomedical applications. Polymers 2021;13:1209–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081209.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Sundarraj, AA, Ranganathan, TV. A review on cellulose and its utilization from agro-industrial waste. Drug Invent Today 2018;10:89–94.Search in Google Scholar

25. Philibert, T, Lee, BH, Fabien, N. Current status and new perspectives on chitin and chitosan as functional biopolymers. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2017;181:1314–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-016-2286-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. van den Broek, Lambertus, AM, Boeriu, CG. Chitin and chitosan (properties and applications). Food Appl Chitosan Deriv 2019;31:315–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119450467.ch13.Search in Google Scholar

27. Frey, MW. Electrospinning cellulose and cellulose derivatives. Polym Rev 2008;48:378–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583720802022281.Search in Google Scholar

28. Houck, MM, editor. Identification of textile fibers. India: Wood head Publishing Limited; 2009.10.1533/9781845695651Search in Google Scholar

29. Ramamoorthy, SK, Skrifvars, M, Persson, A. A review of natural fibers used in biocomposites: plant, animal and regenerated cellulose fibers. Polym Rev 2015;55:107–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2014.971124.Search in Google Scholar

30. Jahandideh, A, Ashkani, M, Moini, N. Biopolymers in textile industries. In: Biopolymers and their industrial applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2021:193–218 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819240-5.00008-0Search in Google Scholar

31. Chand, S, Chand, S, Raula, B. Usage of silkworm materials in various ground of science and research. J Nat Fibers 2022;20:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.2139328.Search in Google Scholar

32. Kurien, RA, Biju, A, Raj, KA, Chacko, A, Joseph, B, Koshy, CP. Chicken feather fiber reinforced composites for sustainable applications. Mater Today Proc 2022;58:862–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.400.Search in Google Scholar

33. Paşayev, N, Kocatepe, S, Maraş, N. Investigation of sound absorption properties of nonwoven webs produced from chicken feather fibers. J Ind Textil 2019;48:1616–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083718766843.Search in Google Scholar

34. Huda, S, Reddy, N, Karst, D, Xu, W, Yang, W, Yang, Y. Nontraditional biofibers for a new textile industry. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 2007;1:177–90. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2007.022.Search in Google Scholar

35. Reddy, N. Non-food industrial applications of poultry feathers. Waste Manag 2015;45:91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Russo, T, Fucile, P, Giacometti, R, Sannino, F. Sustainable removal of contaminants by biopolymers: a novel approach for wastewater treatment. Current state and future perspectives. Processes 2021;9:719–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9040719.Search in Google Scholar

37. Bhattarai, N, Li, Z, Edmondson, D, Zhang, M. Alginate‐based nanofibrous scaffolds: structural, mechanical, and biological properties. Adv Mater 2006;18:1463–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200502537.Search in Google Scholar

38. Tan, L, Li, Z, Shi, R, Quan, F, Wang, B, Ma, X, et al.. Preparation and properties of an alginate-based fiber separator for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020;12:38175–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c10630.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Li, J, He, J, Huang, Y. Role of alginate in antibacterial finishing of textiles. Int J Biol Macromol 2017;94:466–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.10.054.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Barbu, A, Neamtu, B, Zăhan, M, Iancu, GM, Bacila, C, Mireșan, V. Current trends in advanced alginate-based wound dressings for chronic wounds. J Personalized Med 2021;11:890–910. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11090890.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Knill, CJ, Kennedy, JF, Mistry, J, Miraftab, M, Smart, G, Groocock, MR, et al.. Alginate fibres modified with unhydrolysed and hydrolysed chitosans for wound dressings. Carbohydr Polym 2004;55:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.08.004.Search in Google Scholar

42. Zhang, W, Xue, Z, Yan, M, Liu, J, Xia, Y. Effect of epichlorohydrin on the wet spinning of carrageenan fibers under optimal parameter conditions. Carbohydr Polym 2016;150:232–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.032.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Fu, M, Wu, Y, Zhang, Q, Xue, Z, Geng, C, Xia, Y. Study on the mechanical and flame-retardant properties of a novel carrageenan fiber-CAF-K, Al. Eur Polym J 2021;150:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110408.Search in Google Scholar

44. Kong, L, Ziegler, GR. Fabrication of κ-carrageenan fibers by wet spinning: addition of ι-carrageenan. Food Hydrocolloids 2013;30:302–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.06.011.Search in Google Scholar

45. Rideout, TC, Harding, SV, Jones, PJ, Fan, MZ. Guar gum and similar soluble fibers in the regulation of cholesterol metabolism: current understandings and future research priorities. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008;4:1023–33. https://doi.org/10.2147/vhrm.s3512.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Thombare, N, Jha, U, Mishra, S, Siddiqui, MZ. Guar gum as a promising starting material for diverse applications: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 2016;88:361–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Mudgil, D, Barak, S, Khatkar, BS. Guar gum: processing, properties and food applications—a review. J Food Sci Technol 2014;51:409–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0522-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Singh, D, Viswakarma, P, Kumar, B. A review of guar gum processing, properties, and its food applications. Asian J Multidimens Res 2021;10:965–9. https://doi.org/10.5958/2278-4853.2021.00962.9.Search in Google Scholar

49. Mariod, AA. Arabic dietary fiber. In: Gum Arabic. Londan, UK: Apple Academic press, Taylor Francis group; 2018, Chapter-20:237–43 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-812002-6.00020-8Search in Google Scholar

50. Prasad, N, Thombare, N, Sharma, SC, Kumar, S. Gum Arabic–A versatile natural gum: a review on production, processing, properties and applications. Ind Crop Prod 2022;187:115304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115304.Search in Google Scholar

51. Patel, S, Goyal, A. Applications of natural polymer gum Arabic: a review. Int J Food Prop 2015;18:986–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2013.809541.Search in Google Scholar

52. Sanchez, C, Nigen, M, Tamayo, VM, Doco, T, Williams, P, Amine, C, et al.. Acacia gum: history of the future. Food Hydrocolloids 2018;78:140–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.04.008.Search in Google Scholar

53. Schmitz, C, Auza, LG, Koberidze, D, Rasche, S, Fischer, R, Bortesi, L. Conversion of chitin to defined chitosan oligomers: current status and future prospects. Mar Drugs 2019;17:452. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17080452.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

54. Tian, B, Liu, Y. Chitosan‐based biomaterials: from discovery to food application. Polym Adv Technol 2020;31:2408–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.5010.Search in Google Scholar

55. Kim, HS, Lee, CG, Lee, EY. Alginate lyase: structure, property, and application. Biotechnol Bioproc Eng 2011;16:843–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-011-0352-8.Search in Google Scholar

56. Mendis, E, Kim, SK. Present, and future prospects of seaweeds in developing functional foods. Adv Food Nutr Res 2011;64:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387669-0.00001-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

57. Freitas, CMP, Coimbra, JSR, Souza, VGL, Sousa, RCS. Structure and applications of pectin in food, biomedical, and pharmaceutical industry: a review. Coatings 2021;11:922–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11080922.Search in Google Scholar

58. Adetunji, LR, Adekunle, A, Orsat, V, Raghavan, V. Advances in the pectin production process using novel extraction techniques: a review. Food Hydrocolloids 2017;62:239–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.08.015.Search in Google Scholar

59. Liu, J, Sun, L, Xu, W, Wang, Q, Yu, S, Sun, J. Current advances and future perspectives of 3D printing natural-derived biopolymers. Carbohydr Polym 2019;207:297–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.077.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

60. Baranwal, J, Barse, B, Fais, A, Delogu, GL, Kumar, A. Biopolymer: a sustainable material for food and medical applications. Polymers 2022;14:983. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14050983.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

61. Mowafi, S, El-Sayed, H, Taleb, MA. Utilization of proteinic biopolymers: current status and future prospects. J Textil Color Polym Sci 2018;15:15–31. https://doi.org/10.21608/jtcps.2018.5007.1002.Search in Google Scholar

62. Korde, JM, Kandasubramanian, B. Naturally biomimicked smart shape memory hydrogels for biomedical functions. Chem Eng J 2020;379:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122430.Search in Google Scholar

63. Liu, J, Zhao, X. Design of self-assembling peptides and their biomedical applications. Nanomedicine 2011;6:1621–43. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.11.142.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

64. Chatterjee, S, Hui, PCL. Review of applications and future prospects of stimuli-responsive hydrogel based on thermo-responsive biopolymers in drug delivery systems. Polymers 2021;13:2086–102. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13132086.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

65. Abourehab, MA, Rajendran, RR, Singh, A, Pramanik, S, Shrivastav, P, Ansari, MJ, et al.. Alginate as a promising biopolymer in drug delivery and wound healing: a review of the state-of-the-art. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:9035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169035.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central