Effect of ethoxylate number and alkyl chain length on the pathway and kinetics of linear alcohol ethoxylate biodegradation in activated sludge
- ️Wed Jan 01 2025
Journal Article
,
The Procter and Gamble Company, P.O. Box 538707, Cincinnati, Ohio 45253‐8707, USA The Procter and Gamble Company, P.O. Box 538707, Cincinnati, Ohio 45253‐8707, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
The Procter and Gamble Company, P.O. Box 538707, Cincinnati, Ohio 45253‐8707, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Received:
03 February 2004
Published:
01 December 2004
Revision received:
05 November 2009
-
PDF
- Split View
-
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Video
- Audio
- Supplementary Data
-
Cite
Nina R Itrich, Thomas W Federle, Effect of ethoxylate number and alkyl chain length on the pathway and kinetics of linear alcohol ethoxylate biodegradation in activated sludge, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Volume 23, Issue 12, 1 December 2004, Pages 2790–2798, https://doi.org/10.1897/04-053.1
Close
Search
Abstract
Batch activated‐sludge die‐away studies were conducted with various pure homologs to determine the effect of ethoxylate number and alkyl chain length on the kinetics of primary and ultimate biodegradation of linear alcohol ethoxylates. The 14C‐(ethoxylate) homologs C14E1, C14E3, C14E6, and C14E9 were used to investigate the effect of ethoxylate number, and 14C‐(ethoxylate) homologs C12E6, C14E6, and C16E6 were used to examine the effect of chain length. Activated sludge was dosed with a trace concentration (0.2 μM) of each homolog, and the disappearance of parent, formation of metabolites, production of 14CO2, and uptake into solids were monitored with time. Ethoxylate number had little effect on the first‐order decay rates for primary biodegradation, which ranged from 61 to 78 h−1. However, alkyl chain length had a larger effect, with the C16 chain‐length homolog exhibiting a slower rate of parent decay (18 h−1) compared to its corresponding C12 and C14 homologs (61–69 h−1). Ethoxylate number affected the mechanism of biodegradation, with fission of the central ether bond to yield the corresponding fatty alcohol and (poly)ethylene glycol group increasing in dominance with increasing ethoxylate number. Based upon the measured rates of primary biodegradation, removal of parent during activated‐sludge treatment was predicted to range between 99.7 and 99.8% for all homologs except C16E6, which had a predicted removal of 98.9%. Based upon the measured rates of ultimate biodegradation, removal of ethoxylate‐containing metabolites was predicted to exceed 83% for all homologs. These predictions corresponded closely with previously published removal measurements in laboratory continuous activated‐sludge systems and actual treatment plants.
INTRODUCTION
Alcohol ethoxylates are a family of nonionic surfactants characterized by a hydrophobic alkyl chain and a polar ethoxylate head group. Commercial linear alcohol ethoxylates (LAEs) are complex mixtures of homologs with alkyl chains of varying lengths with a range of ethoxymers. Linear alcohol ethoxylate homologs are identified by using the convention CxEy, where x is the total carbon number in the alkyl chain and y is the number of ethoxylate groups (OCH2CH2) in the molecule. Mixtures are similarly identified, with x and y designating the range or average chain length and ethoxylate number. Detergent‐range LAEs typically encompass C12–18 alkyl chain lengths and an ethoxylate range of 1 to 22 units. In 2000, combined production of LAEs in North America and Western Europe exceeded 435,000 metric tons, with approximately 60% being used in household laundry products [1].
The biodegradability of alcohol ethoxylates has been studied extensively in numerous screening tests [2,3], and detergent‐range mixtures usually are ready biodegradable. In synthesizing the results of more than 250 screening tests, Swisher [3] concluded that ultimate biodegradation was favored by linearity of the hydrophobe and shortness of the ethoxylate chain. Biodegradation of LAEs has been observed to proceed by three different pathways [3]. The most common, central fission, occurs when the ether bond connecting the hydrophobe to the ethoxylate chain is cleaved, leading to the formation of fatty alcohol and polyethylene glycol (PEG), which are biodegraded independently. Alternatively, the terminal carbon of the alkyl chain can undergo omega oxidation, which is followed by inward biodegradation involving beta oxidation. Lastly, the terminal end of the hydrophile can undergo hydrolytic or oxidative attack. Although the most frequently reported pathway for biodegradation is central fission followed by rapid degradation of the resulting alcohol and slower degradation of the PEG [4–6], the mode of initial attack appears to be linked to experimental conditions and the complexity of the hydrophobe [5].
Although screening tests are useful to demonstrate the inherent and ultimate biodegradability of chemicals, more realistic simulation tests are needed to determine the actual kinetics and pathways in the environment. An example of such testing was performed by Larson and Games [7], who examined the mineralization kinetics of two different LAE homologs, labeled in both the alkyl and ethoxylate moieties, in river water. In the case of a C12E9 homolog, the alkyl chain was converted to CO2 more than twice as fast as the ethoxylate moiety, whereas similar rates of mineralization were observed both for the alkyl and ethoxylate moieties of a C16E3 homolog. A continuous activated‐sludge (CAS) test is a dynamic simulation of fate during activated‐sludge wastewater treatment. It accurately predicts effluent concentrations of parent and metabolites that can enter a receiving stream. However, the CAS test is limited in that the results are only directly applicable to a single set of operating conditions, defined by the hydraulic retention time (HRT) and solids retention time (SRT) [8,9]. Four CAS studies on LAEs have been reported in the literature. Steber and Wierich [10] conducted a study on a single 14C‐radiolabeled C18E7 homolog, and Kravetz et al. [11] evaluated a commercial mixture with alkyl chain lengths C12–15 and an average ethoxylate number of nine by using a dual‐labeled test material that was 3H labeled in the hydrophobe and 14C labeled in the ethoxylate chain. More recently, Battersby et al. [12] assessed the removal of both C12–15E3 and C12–15E7 mixtures in a CAS system, whereas Szymanski et al. [13] examined a C12E10 mixture. To date, no studies have systematically evaluated both the kinetics and pathways of LAE biodegradation as a function of chain length and ethoxylate number under realistic wastewater treatment conditions.
Table 1.
Characterization of the 14C linear alcohol ethoxylate homologs that were evaluated for biodegradation in activated sludge
Homolog | Structure with position of 14C | Molecular weight (g/mol) | Specific activity (μCi/mg) | Radiochemical purity (%) |
C14E1 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2OH | 258.4 | 23.2 | 96.9 |
C14E3 | CH3(CH2)13O(CH2CH2O)2CH214CH2OH | 346.6 | 13.7 | 95.8 |
C14E6 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 478.7 | 10.3 | 98.1 |
C14E9 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)8OH | 610.9 | 8.0 | >99 |
C12E6 | CH3(CH2)11OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 450.7 | 14.0 | 93.0 |
C16E6 | CH3(CH2)15OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 506.8 | 12.3 | 95.2 |
Homolog | Structure with position of 14C | Molecular weight (g/mol) | Specific activity (μCi/mg) | Radiochemical purity (%) |
C14E1 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2OH | 258.4 | 23.2 | 96.9 |
C14E3 | CH3(CH2)13O(CH2CH2O)2CH214CH2OH | 346.6 | 13.7 | 95.8 |
C14E6 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 478.7 | 10.3 | 98.1 |
C14E9 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)8OH | 610.9 | 8.0 | >99 |
C12E6 | CH3(CH2)11OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 450.7 | 14.0 | 93.0 |
C16E6 | CH3(CH2)15OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 506.8 | 12.3 | 95.2 |
Table 1.
Characterization of the 14C linear alcohol ethoxylate homologs that were evaluated for biodegradation in activated sludge
Homolog | Structure with position of 14C | Molecular weight (g/mol) | Specific activity (μCi/mg) | Radiochemical purity (%) |
C14E1 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2OH | 258.4 | 23.2 | 96.9 |
C14E3 | CH3(CH2)13O(CH2CH2O)2CH214CH2OH | 346.6 | 13.7 | 95.8 |
C14E6 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 478.7 | 10.3 | 98.1 |
C14E9 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)8OH | 610.9 | 8.0 | >99 |
C12E6 | CH3(CH2)11OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 450.7 | 14.0 | 93.0 |
C16E6 | CH3(CH2)15OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 506.8 | 12.3 | 95.2 |
Homolog | Structure with position of 14C | Molecular weight (g/mol) | Specific activity (μCi/mg) | Radiochemical purity (%) |
C14E1 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2OH | 258.4 | 23.2 | 96.9 |
C14E3 | CH3(CH2)13O(CH2CH2O)2CH214CH2OH | 346.6 | 13.7 | 95.8 |
C14E6 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 478.7 | 10.3 | 98.1 |
C14E9 | CH3(CH2)13OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)8OH | 610.9 | 8.0 | >99 |
C12E6 | CH3(CH2)11OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 450.7 | 14.0 | 93.0 |
C16E6 | CH3(CH2)15OCH214CH2(OCH2CH2)5OH | 506.8 | 12.3 | 95.2 |
This paper describes a series of radiolabeled batch activated‐sludge die‐away [14] tests that were used to examine the biodegradation kinetics of specific LAE homologs under realistic activated‐sludge sewage‐treatment conditions. A trace level of each test chemical was dosed to activated sludge and the rates of primary and metabolite degradation, as well as mineralization, were followed by using specific radioanalytical methods. The progression of metabolites also was examined to elucidate the mechanism by which the LAE components biodegraded. This testing was conducted in two phases with relatively pure radiolabeled homologs. The 14C‐(ethoxylate) homologs C14E1, C14E3, C14E6, and C14E9 were evaluated to investigate the effect of ethoxylate number, and 14C‐(ethoxylate) homologs C12E6, C14E6, and C16E6 were tested to examine the effect of chain length on biodegradation. The C14E6 served as a benchmark during both phases of testing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Test materials
The 14C homologs were synthesized at the Procter and Gamble Company (Cincinnati, OH, USA). For each homolog, the 14C label was located in a single carbon position within the ethoxylate moiety. In the case of C14E1, the 14C syntheses involved addition of an ethoxylate group by reacting the starting fatty alcohol with 14C‐chloroacetic acid. In the case of C14E3, the synthesis involved reacting a purified C14E2 LAE with 14C‐bromoacetic acid. In the case of the other homologs, the synthesis involved addition of a radiolabled ethoxylate to the starting alcohol with 14C‐bromoacetic acid followed by addition of five or more additional ethoxylate units. Radiochemical purity was determined by radio–thin‐layer chromatography (radio‐TLC) analysis by using a Bioscan Imaging 200 System (Bioscan, Washington, DC). Specific activity was determined with a Beckman LS 6500 scintillation counter (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA). Table 1 shows the structure and 14C position for each homolog as well as molecular weight, radiochemical purity, and specific activity. In the case of the 14C‐C14E3, 76% of the total impurity was 14C‐C14E2, whereas approximately 50% of the total impurity in the 14C‐C12E6 was 14C‐C12E5. All other impurities could not be identified.
Overview of biodegradation testing
The testing was performed in two phases. In phase 1, the effect of ethoxylate number on biodegradation kinetics was examined by using C14E1, C14E3, C14E6, and C14E9. In phase 2, the effect of chain length was examined by using C12E6, C14E6, and C16E6. The test procedure has been described previously by Federle and Itrich [14]. Briefly, a trace concentration of radiolabeled test material was dosed to freshly collected activated sludge in an open test system. Periodically, sludge samples were collected and lyophilized, and the dried solids were extracted. The disappearance of parent and progression of metabolite formation and decay were monitored over time by TLC of the extracts with radioactivity detection. Production of 14CO2 was determined by comparing total radioactivity in a bioactive treatment compared to that in an abiotic control by using liquid scintillation counting. Incorporation into bio‐mass was monitored by combustion and liquid scintillation counting analysis of the extracted sludge solids.
Test system
Activated‐sludge mixed liquor was freshly collected on two occasions from Downingtown Regional Water Pollution Control Center (Downingtown, PA, USA). This plant receives predominantly domestic wastewater. The solids level of the mixed‐liquor suspended solids was adjusted to 2,500 mg/L before use. Two treatments were prepared for each test material that consisted of 1 L each of biologically active sludge and abiotic control sludge in 2‐L flasks. The abiotic control was prepared by amending the sludge with mercuric chloride at 1 g/L followed by autoclaving for 90 min. Each of the 14C test materials was dosed at a concentration of 0.2 μM in both treatments, which were continually mixed on a shaker table and incubated at 20 ± 2°C. Samples were collected for both mineralization and chemical analysis at each sampling interval. In an effort to accurately assess the early events in the kinetics of biodegradation, rapid sampling occurred over the first 8 h of the test. Subsamples were taken at 1, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min. Subsequent samples were collected every 2 h until the 8‐h time point, and then removed every 24 to 48 h for the remainder of the experiment.
Analysis of mineralization
Mineralization was based on the difference between the total radioactivity in the bioactive and abiotic treatments after acidification. Triplicate 1‐ml aliquots of sludge were taken from each treatment and placed into separate 20‐ml glass scintillation vials containing 1 ml of 0.5% HCl. The acidified samples were incubated overnight, mixed with 15 ml of Ultima Gold Scintillation Cocktail (Packard, Meriden, CT, USA), and analyzed by liquid scintillation counting.
Analysis of parent and metabolite
At each sampling, 10 ml of sludge from each treatment was transferred to a 15‐ml screwtop centrifuge tube and immediately frozen in a dry ice‐acetone bath. The frozen samples were stored at −80°C until lyophilized by using a Virtis bench‐top model 3.3L freeze dryer (Virtis, Gardiner, NY, USA). The lyophilized sludge from phase 1 was extracted twice with 5 ml of methanol:acetone (2:1, v/v) to recover parent and metabolites, whereas the samples from phase 2 were extracted twice with methanol. The sludge solids from both phases were subsequently extracted twice with 5 ml of water. After removing aliquots for liquid scintillation counting, the solvent extracts were concentrated under nitrogen, and the water extracts were frozen and lyophilized. Both were reconstituted in a minimal volume of the original diluent, and subsamples were spotted onto prechanneled 60 A Silica Gel 60 TLC plates (Whatman, Clifton, NJ, USA). The plates used for the C14E1 homolog were developed in ethyl acetate:hexane (1:1, v/v), whereas the plates used with the other homologs were developed in chloroform:methanol:formic acid (90:10:1, v/v/v). After development, the plates were allowed to dry and were then scanned with a Bioscan Imaging 200 System.
Analysis of sludge solids for biomass incorporation
The extracted solids were quantitatively transferred to microfuge tubes and centrifuged. The supernatant was decanted, and the solids were combusted in a Packard Sample Oxidizer (model 307, Hewlett‐Packard, Avondale, PA, USA) system and analyzed by liquid scintillation counting.
Kinetic and statistical analyses
The data describing the disappearance of parent and total parent and metabolites were fit to various equations by using nonlinear regression analysis with Table Curve 2D software, Version 4.0 (Jandel Scientific, San Raefael, CA, USA). The two‐compartment first‐order decay model yielded the best fit in most cases, so all data were fit to this model. This model has the form
where y is the percent of initial parent or total parent and metabolites present at time t, A is the percent degraded at first‐order rate k1, and B is the percent degraded at the first‐order rate k2. Likewise, the mineralization data were fit to a two‐compartment first‐order production model with the form
where y is the percent of the initial material mineralized to 14CO2 at time t, A is the percent 14CO2 produced at first‐order rate k1, and B is the percent 14CO2 produced at the first‐order rate k2. Linear regression and correlation analyses were conducted with Systat, Version 5.0 (Systat, Point Richmond, CA, USA).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The average recovery of radioactivity from the abiotic controls exceeded 93% for all the homologs, and the majority (>98%) of this radioactivity was present as parent at the termination of the experiments (Table 2). The bulk of the remaining radioactivity was associated with the solids. The average recovery from the biologically active treatments was consistently lower than that from the abiotic controls (82–88%), which is attributed to the difficulty in accurately assessing mineralization to 14CO2. In this study, mineralization was determined by comparing liquid scintillation counts of mixed liquor samples from the biotic and abiotic treatments. These samples contain a high level of suspended solids that reduce counting efficiency. Although alternate approaches for assessing mineralization, such as trapping of evolved 14CO2 with alkali, are not limited by counting efficiency, they have other limitations, including trapping efficiency and physical transfer rates that mask the true rate of mineralization. Given the kinetic limitations of other approaches for measuring mineralization, the rapid rates of mineralization expected, and abundant evidence showing that LAEs degrade completely, the method to measure mineralization was selected based upon its ability to provide the most accurate kinetic information.
Table 2.
Total radioactivity (mean ± standard deviation) added in the form of 14C linear alcohol ethoxylates that was recovered from abiotic control and biologically active (biotic) activated sludge during sampling (n = 16)
Homolog | Abiotic | Biotic |
Phase 1 | ||
C14E1 | 93.1 ± 1.3 | 88.3 ± 3.7 |
C14E3 | 97.6 ± 2.8 | 86.5 ± 4.6 |
C14E6 | 102.0 ± 3.3 | 82.3 ± 5.6 |
C14E9 | 100.5 ± 4.15 | 86.9 ± 7.6 |
Phase 2 | ||
C12E6 | 105.8 ± 2.4 | 88.0 ± 6.8 |
C14E6 | 97.6 ± 4.2 | 84.8 ± 5.6 |
C16E6 | 103.5 ± 2.7 | 87.4 ± 10.5 |
Homolog | Abiotic | Biotic |
Phase 1 | ||
C14E1 | 93.1 ± 1.3 | 88.3 ± 3.7 |
C14E3 | 97.6 ± 2.8 | 86.5 ± 4.6 |
C14E6 | 102.0 ± 3.3 | 82.3 ± 5.6 |
C14E9 | 100.5 ± 4.15 | 86.9 ± 7.6 |
Phase 2 | ||
C12E6 | 105.8 ± 2.4 | 88.0 ± 6.8 |
C14E6 | 97.6 ± 4.2 | 84.8 ± 5.6 |
C16E6 | 103.5 ± 2.7 | 87.4 ± 10.5 |
Table 2.
Total radioactivity (mean ± standard deviation) added in the form of 14C linear alcohol ethoxylates that was recovered from abiotic control and biologically active (biotic) activated sludge during sampling (n = 16)
Homolog | Abiotic | Biotic |
Phase 1 | ||
C14E1 | 93.1 ± 1.3 | 88.3 ± 3.7 |
C14E3 | 97.6 ± 2.8 | 86.5 ± 4.6 |
C14E6 | 102.0 ± 3.3 | 82.3 ± 5.6 |
C14E9 | 100.5 ± 4.15 | 86.9 ± 7.6 |
Phase 2 | ||
C12E6 | 105.8 ± 2.4 | 88.0 ± 6.8 |
C14E6 | 97.6 ± 4.2 | 84.8 ± 5.6 |
C16E6 | 103.5 ± 2.7 | 87.4 ± 10.5 |
Homolog | Abiotic | Biotic |
Phase 1 | ||
C14E1 | 93.1 ± 1.3 | 88.3 ± 3.7 |
C14E3 | 97.6 ± 2.8 | 86.5 ± 4.6 |
C14E6 | 102.0 ± 3.3 | 82.3 ± 5.6 |
C14E9 | 100.5 ± 4.15 | 86.9 ± 7.6 |
Phase 2 | ||
C12E6 | 105.8 ± 2.4 | 88.0 ± 6.8 |
C14E6 | 97.6 ± 4.2 | 84.8 ± 5.6 |
C16E6 | 103.5 ± 2.7 | 87.4 ± 10.5 |
Table 3 shows the final disposition of radioactivity in the test systems. In the abiotic controls, the bulk of the radioactivity (>97% of the total recovered) was still in the form of parent with a small residual associated with solids (0.4‐1.9% of initial). In the biotic treatments, none of the radioactivity was present as parent alcohol ethoxylate and no more than 4% was in the form of metabolites that could be resolved through chromatography. The majority of the radioactivity that was not mineralized was associated with the solids (7–14% of initial) or was present as extractable but chromatographically indistinct materials (3–7% of initial).
Figure 1 shows chromatograms of the methanol:acetone extracts from the biotic treatments after a 5‐min incubation period during phase 1 with C14 homologs with different ethoxylate numbers. Similar chromatograms (not shown) of extracts from the abiotic controls exhibit a single major peak representing the parent test materials with very small minor peaks representing radiochemical impurities. The chromatograms from biotic treatments in phase 2 are not shown but have a similar pattern to that observed for C14E6 during phase 1. In addition to showing the presence of residual parent, the 5‐min sample chromatograms for all the homologs revealed the appearance of poorly resolved polar materials that remained at the origin or migrated just above it, which are designated as polar metabolites I. In addition, chromatograms for some homologs showed the appearances of a metabolite somewhat more polar than the parent, which is designated as polar metabolite II, and a nonpolar metabolite, which migrated farther than the parent. The distribution and position of these peaks combined with previous information on likely metabolites provide insight into the mechanisms of initial biodegradation. Patterson et al. [15] isolated acidic and neutral PEGs during the biodegradation of a commercial C16–18E9 mixture and concluded that initial primary biodegradation occurs via two simultaneous but independent pathways. These included central fission, involving the cleavage of the ether bond connecting the hydrophobe to the ethoxylate, and omega oxidation of the terminal methyl group in the alkyl chain to yield a carboxyalkyl ethoxylate. The occurrence of these simultaneous and independent modes of attack has since been confirmed in a pure culture with Pseudomonas sp. strain SC25A [16] and in bench‐scale activated‐sludge systems [10]. Central fission of the test materials used in this study would yield 14C‐PEGs, which migrate just above the origin, appearing to the far left of the parent in the chromatograms. The actual Rf values for specific PEGs vary with chain length. Omega oxidation of the terminal methyl group in the alkyl chain hydrophobe, and subsequent shortening of the chain through beta oxidation, would yield carboxyalkyl ethoxylates, which initially would be slightly more polar than the parent and then become increasingly more polar and impossible to resolve from PEGs as the alkyl chain becomes shortened. Although not previously reported as a primary degradation mechanism for LAEs, oxidative attack of the terminal ethoxylate alcohol to form a carboxylate has been reported for alkyl phenol ethoxylates [11,15]. Such a material would be less polar than the parent under the chromatographic conditions used in this study and migrate farther up the plate than the parent.
Table 3.
Final disposition of radioactivity added in the form of 14C linear alcohol ethoxylates that was recovered from abiotic control and biologically active (biotic) activated sludge after 168 h of incubation
Homolog | Treatment | Parent (%) | Resolvable metabolitesa (%) | Other extracted materialsb (%) | Associated with solids (%) | CO2 (%) | Total recovery (%) |
Phase 1 | |||||||
C14E1 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 74.7 | 87.6 |
Abiotic | 90.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 92.0 | |
C14E3 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.4 | 6.2 | 7.4 | 72.6 | 88.4 |
Abiotic | 96.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 97.6 | |
C14E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 8.0 | 68.2 | 83.2 |
Abiotic | 98.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 99.4 | |
C14E9 | Biotic | 0.0 | 1.9 | 5.7 | 11.4 | 66.0 | 85.0 |
Abiotic | 90.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.36 | 0.0 | 91.2 | |
Phase 2 | |||||||
C12E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.2 | 13.2 | 68.6 | 91.0 |
Abiotic | 106.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 106.8 | |
C14E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 3.5 | 6.1 | 13.7 | 67.0 | 90.2 |
Abiotic | 95.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 97.1 | |
C16E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 4.0 | 7.2 | 10.3 | 64.1 | 85.7 |
Abiotic | 106.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 107.7 |
Homolog | Treatment | Parent (%) | Resolvable metabolitesa (%) | Other extracted materialsb (%) | Associated with solids (%) | CO2 (%) | Total recovery (%) |
Phase 1 | |||||||
C14E1 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 74.7 | 87.6 |
Abiotic | 90.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 92.0 | |
C14E3 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.4 | 6.2 | 7.4 | 72.6 | 88.4 |
Abiotic | 96.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 97.6 | |
C14E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 8.0 | 68.2 | 83.2 |
Abiotic | 98.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 99.4 | |
C14E9 | Biotic | 0.0 | 1.9 | 5.7 | 11.4 | 66.0 | 85.0 |
Abiotic | 90.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.36 | 0.0 | 91.2 | |
Phase 2 | |||||||
C12E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.2 | 13.2 | 68.6 | 91.0 |
Abiotic | 106.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 106.8 | |
C14E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 3.5 | 6.1 | 13.7 | 67.0 | 90.2 |
Abiotic | 95.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 97.1 | |
C16E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 4.0 | 7.2 | 10.3 | 64.1 | 85.7 |
Abiotic | 106.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 107.7 |
a Present as discrete, integrated peaks within the chromatograms of the extracts.
b Not present as discrete, integrated peaks within the chromatograms of the extracts.
Table 3.
Final disposition of radioactivity added in the form of 14C linear alcohol ethoxylates that was recovered from abiotic control and biologically active (biotic) activated sludge after 168 h of incubation
Homolog | Treatment | Parent (%) | Resolvable metabolitesa (%) | Other extracted materialsb (%) | Associated with solids (%) | CO2 (%) | Total recovery (%) |
Phase 1 | |||||||
C14E1 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 74.7 | 87.6 |
Abiotic | 90.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 92.0 | |
C14E3 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.4 | 6.2 | 7.4 | 72.6 | 88.4 |
Abiotic | 96.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 97.6 | |
C14E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 8.0 | 68.2 | 83.2 |
Abiotic | 98.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 99.4 | |
C14E9 | Biotic | 0.0 | 1.9 | 5.7 | 11.4 | 66.0 | 85.0 |
Abiotic | 90.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.36 | 0.0 | 91.2 | |
Phase 2 | |||||||
C12E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.2 | 13.2 | 68.6 | 91.0 |
Abiotic | 106.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 106.8 | |
C14E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 3.5 | 6.1 | 13.7 | 67.0 | 90.2 |
Abiotic | 95.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 97.1 | |
C16E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 4.0 | 7.2 | 10.3 | 64.1 | 85.7 |
Abiotic | 106.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 107.7 |
Homolog | Treatment | Parent (%) | Resolvable metabolitesa (%) | Other extracted materialsb (%) | Associated with solids (%) | CO2 (%) | Total recovery (%) |
Phase 1 | |||||||
C14E1 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 74.7 | 87.6 |
Abiotic | 90.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 92.0 | |
C14E3 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.4 | 6.2 | 7.4 | 72.6 | 88.4 |
Abiotic | 96.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 97.6 | |
C14E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 8.0 | 68.2 | 83.2 |
Abiotic | 98.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 99.4 | |
C14E9 | Biotic | 0.0 | 1.9 | 5.7 | 11.4 | 66.0 | 85.0 |
Abiotic | 90.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.36 | 0.0 | 91.2 | |
Phase 2 | |||||||
C12E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.2 | 13.2 | 68.6 | 91.0 |
Abiotic | 106.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 106.8 | |
C14E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 3.5 | 6.1 | 13.7 | 67.0 | 90.2 |
Abiotic | 95.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 97.1 | |
C16E6 | Biotic | 0.0 | 4.0 | 7.2 | 10.3 | 64.1 | 85.7 |
Abiotic | 106.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 107.7 |
a Present as discrete, integrated peaks within the chromatograms of the extracts.
b Not present as discrete, integrated peaks within the chromatograms of the extracts.
Figures 2 and 3 show the disappearance of the parent, formation and disappearance of metabolites, incorporation into solids, and formation of 14CO2 as a function of time during the first 48 h. Disappearance of parent was extremely rapid, being nearly complete within the first hour and was associated with the instantaneous appearance of metabolites, which transiently accounted for up to 80% of the total radioactivity, depending upon the homolog. After this rapid appearance, metabolite levels decreased with the concurrent formation of 14CO2. Both the disappearance of metabolites and the production of 14CO2 were biphasic and occurred initially at a very fast rate and then at a slower rate. The transition from the fast to slow rates occurred after 1 to 4 h, depending upon the homolog. In addition to being converted to metabolites and mineralized to CO2, some of the radiolabel was incorporated into biomass. Table 3 shows the level of radioactivity associated with the solids at the end of the study (168 h). This level was substantially greater in the biotic compared to the abiotic treatments, consistent with incorporation into biomass. In the abiotic controls, the average radioactivity associated with the solids ranged from 0.4 to 1.9% and did not change with time, thus reflecting materials that could not be recovered through extraction. Figures 2 and 3 show that in the biotic treatments, the level of radioactivity associated with the solids increased with time and reached a maximum within the first 24 h, followed in most cases by a gradual decline. On average, the percentage of radioactivity associated with the solids was highest for the higher ethoxylate materials (E6 and E9), which could reflect the different anabolic fates of the different metabolites.
It was not possible to definitively identify all metabolites because of their low concentrations and transient nature as well as a lack of putative standards. Nevertheless, inspection of the metabolite patterns (Fig. 1) and the progression of their formation and disappearance (Figs. 2 and 3) indicate that ethoxylate number significantly affected the relative importance of the various pathways for biodegradation. In the case of C14E1, the disappearance of the parent was associated with the immediate appearance of materials, which were both more polar and less polar than the parent. Because the C14E1 homolog has only one ethoxylate group and the radiolabel in the C14E3 homolog is located in the terminal ethoxylate group, central fission would yield 14C‐ethylene glycol, which would be highly polar and remain close to the origin. Oxidative attack of the terminal methyl group of the alkyl chain would result in the formation of a 14C‐carboxyalkyl ethoxylate, which would be more polar than the parent and appear to the left of the parent, whereas omega oxidation of the terminal ethoxylate would result in the formation of 14C‐alkyl ethoxy carboxylates, which would be less polar and migrate to the right of parent. In the chromatograms from the earliest time points, the polar material is likely the central fission product, ethylene glycol, whereas the less‐polar metabolite can only be the alkyl ethoxylate carboxylate. Thus, it appears that initial attack on the C14E1 homolog involved both central fission and oxidation of the terminal ethoxylate, with the latter process being more predominant. Notably, no evidence was found of carboxyalkyl ethoxylates being formed.
Fig. 1.
Thin‐layer radio chromatograms of methanol:acetone extracts of activated sludge dosed with 14C radiolabeled linear alcohol ethoxylate homologs after 5 min of incubation.
In the case of the C14E3 homolog, the initial disappearance of parent was associated with the appearance of three materials, a polar material close to the origin, a material just to the left and somewhat more polar than the parent, and a material less polar than the parent at a low level. The first corresponds to triethylene glycol; the second likely corresponds to the omega oxidation product of the alkyl chain, and the third can only represent alkyl ethoxy carboxylate. Hence, three modes of attack are probably operative for this homolog, central fission, omega oxidation of terminal methyl of the hydrophobe, and omega oxidation of the terminal ethoxylate, with the first two being the most prominent. In the case of C14E6, only two peaks initially arise with the disappearance of parent, a polar peak corresponding to PEG and a smaller peak slightly more polar than the parent, which is likely the carboxyalkyl ethoxylate. Hence, for this homolog, central fission appears to predominate, whereas omega oxidation of the hydrophobe occurs to a smaller extent. This same pattern also is observed with this homolog during phase 2 and with C12E6 and C16E6. In the case of C14E9, only one metabolite is initially formed, consistent with central fission being the sole mechanism of primary biodegradation for this homolog. Therefore, in activated sludge, the mode of attack for most materials involved central fission and the predominance of this route increased as ethoxylate number increased. This observation is consistent with results from CAS studies. Steber and Wierich [17], who used radiolabeled C18E7 model compounds labeled in both the alkyl and ethoxylate moieties, reported that the level of neutral PEG intermediates in the effluent of a CAS system was higher than that for carboxyalkyl ethoxylates. Neutral PEG‐like intermediates were found in effluents of CAS systems dosed with C14–15E11, C14–15E15, and C14–15E20 [18], and PEG was enriched in the effluent of CAS units fed C12–15E3 and C12–15E7 [12] as well as C12E10 [13]. Notably, although this study confirms that central fission is a predominant mechanism of biodegradation, it is the first to show that the degree of this dominance can be affected by ethoxylate number.
Table 4 shows the kinetic constants describing the decay of parent, disappearance of total parent and metabolites, and production of 14CO2. Data were fit to a two‐compartment first‐order model, which assumes two pools of material, biodegraded at two distinct rates. In the case of parent decay, the first rate (k1) describes the biodegradation of the largest and most bioavailable pool (A%), which is most likely to escape sewage treatment. The second rate (k2) describes the biodegradation of a smaller and less bioavailable pool (B%), consisting of sorbed chemical. This sequestered parent can be viewed as an artifact of the batch system and is not relevant under continuous‐flow conditions and would minimally contribute to the level of parent escaping into effluent under actual activated‐sludge conditions because of its association with sludge solids. The k1 of primary biodegradation, which describes the rate at which the majority of the compound degrades, ranged from 61.6 to 78.4 h−1 and increased with increasing ethoxylate number for the C14 chain‐length materials in phase 1. These rates represent half‐lives ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 min, and the rate correlated with ethoxylate number (r = 0.92; p ≤ 0.1). In the second set of experiments, the effect of hydrophobe length on biodegradation was examined by using materials with six ethoxylate units. The C14E6 was common to both sets of experiments and behaved similarly, with k1 values of 70.1 ± 3.2 h−1 and 61.4 ± 3.1 h−1 in phases 1 and 2, respectively, which were performed with sludge samples obtained three weeks apart. In phase 2, k1 decreased with increasing chain length and ranged from 17.9 to 69.2 h−1, with half‐lives ranging from 0.6 to 2.3 min. Although not significant because of the low number of degrees of freedom, the correlation coefficient between k1 and chain length equaled −0.93 in phase 2. When combining the k1 data from both phases, the only substantial correlation existed between k1 and chain length (r = −0.74; p ≤ 0.1). Both alkyl chain length and ethoxylate number can affect hydrophobicity and sorption. To assess this combined effect, k1 values from both phases were compared to sorption coefficients (Kd) previously reported for these homologs [19]. In this analysis, k1 and Kd were negatively correlated (r = −0.87; p < 0.01), further indicating that biodegradation rate and hydrophobicity are inversely related.
Fig. 2.
Percent of initial radioactivity remaining as parent, converted to metabolites, incorporated into solids, or mineralized to 14CO2 for linear alcohol ethoxylate homologs with a C14 alkyl chain but different numbers of ethoxylate units as a function of incubation time in activated sludge.
Because decay of parent was extremely rapid compared to that for the metabolites, the rates describing the disappearance of combined parent and metabolites primarily describe the biodegradation of the metabolites. The vast majority of this disappearance was described by k1, which ranged in phase 1 from 0.80 to 2.7 h−1 and increased with increasing ethoxylate number for the C14‐chain‐length materials. These rates represented half‐lives ranging from 15 to 84 min and were significantly correlated with ethoxylate number (r = 0.98; p ≤ 0.05). The k1 describing combined parent and metabolite biodegradation for C14E6 was 1.7 h−1 in both phases 1 and 2, showing the reproducibility of the test and the ability to directly compare results from both experimental phases. In phase 2, k1 did not vary in a consistent pattern with chain length, ranging from 1.0 to 1.7 h−1 with half‐lives ranging from 24 to 42 min. Rates describing the mineralization of the homologs to 14CO2 were comparable in magnitude to the rates describing the decay of combined parent and metabolites in both experimental phases. The mineralization rate (k1) ranged from 1.0 to 4.1 h−1.
The first‐order rates measured in this study and previously published sorption coefficients [19] were used to estimate removal of each homolog in the aeration and clarification units of an activated‐sludge treatment plant. The concentration of an LAE homolog leaving a treatment plant free in solution or sorbed to suspended solids in the final effluent is a function of its first‐order biodegradation rate (k1), its sorption coefficient (Kd), the concentration of solids in the aeration basin (SSreactor), the HRT, the SRT, and the concentration of solids in the final effluent (SSeff) [20]. The concentration of dissolved LAE in the effluent (Ceff(dissolved)) was calculated by using the following equation:
where Cinf is the influent concentration of LAE (100%), SSreactor is 2.5 × 10−3 kg/L, HRT is 6 h, and SRT is 240 h. The concentration of LAE sorbed (Ceff(sorbed)) to effluent solids was calculated from the concentration of dissolved LAE as described below
where SSeff is 2.0 × 10−5 kg/L, and the total LAE in effluent is
The values used for HRT, SRT, SSreactor, and SSeff were typical values from the field [21,22].
The percent of intact LAE present in influent predicted to occur in the dissolved and sorbed form in effluent is shown in Table 5. For all homologs, total removal of parent was predicted to exceed 98%, and with the exception of C16E6, where removal was predicted to fall between 99.7 and 99.8%. With the exception of C16E6 parent LAE, the contribution of LAE sorbed to effluent solids was less than 8% of the total amount in effluent. Removal of C16E6 was predicted to be lower than the other homologs because of its slower primary biodegradation rate. In addition, the contribution of sorbed C16E6 in effluent (17%) was much greater because of its higher sorption. These predictions for removal efficiency are comparable to those measured in CAS tests in the laboratory and in monitoring of actual wastewater plants in the field. Kravetz et al. [23] reported that parent removal of C12–15E9 based upon analysis of cobalt thiocyanate active substances in a CAS system operated with an HRT of 8 h exceeded 98%. Steber and Wierich [10] reported approximately 99% removal for a model C18E7 homolog in a CAS system operated with a 3‐h HRT. More recently, Szymanski et al. [13] reported an average removal of 96.8% for a C12E10 in CAS system operated with an HRT of 3.5 h, based upon a bismuth active substance and indirect tensammetric methods. Finally, Battersby et al. [12] reported that >99.9% of C12–15E3 and C12–15E7 were removed in a CAS system operated with an HRT of 6 h, based upon high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection. Similar removals have been reported in the field. Gledhill et al. [24] reported removals of 99% for LAE at an Oklahoma, USA, activated‐sludge plant when using HPLC detection. McAvoy et al. [25] used gas chromatography with mass selective detection to measure total LAE concentration in raw influent and effluent from four activated‐sludge and six trickling‐filter treatment plants. Removals averaged 99.1 ± 0.9% and 93.8 ± 3.8% for activated‐sludge and trickling‐filter plants, respectively, excluding overloaded or upset plants. Notably, removal was inversely correlated with the level of solids in the effluents. Matthijs et al. [26] monitored seven municipal treatment plants in The Netherlands, and found average removals between 99.1 and 99.9% for the various plants.
Fig. 3.
Percent of initial radioactivity remaining as parent, converted to metabolites, incorporated into solids, or mineralized to 14CO2 for linear alcohol ethoxylate homologs with six ethoxylate units but different alkyl chain lengths as a function of incubation time in activated sludge.
Table 4.
Parameters (estimate ± standard error) describing the biodegradation of linear alcohol ethoxylate homologs based upon two‐compartment first‐order decay or production models
Homolog | r2 | A (%)a | k1(h−1) | B (%)b | k2 (h−1) |
Decay of parent | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.998 | 71.2 ± 2.9 | 61.6 ± 5.1 | 28.1 ± 2.6 | 3.1 ± 0.4 |
C14E3 | 0.998 | 49.4 ± 4.4 | 70.6 ± 10.4 | 50.9 ± 4.1 | 5.7 ± 0.6 |
C14E6 | 0.999 | 63.3 ± 1.5 | 70.1 ± 3.2 | 36.6 ± 1.3 | 3.9 ± 0.2 |
C14E9 | 0.999 | 89.1 ± 0.9 | 78.4 ± 1.8 | 10.9 ± 0.8 | 2.7 ± 0.3 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.999 | 92.6 ± 0.4 | 69.2 ± 0.4 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.3 |
C14E6 | 0.999 | 83.2 ± 2.9 | 61.4 ± 3.1 | 16.7 ± 2.8 | 6.4 ± 1.3 |
C16E6 | 0.999 | 58.6 ± 5.6 | 17.9 ± 2.4 | 39.8 ± 5.7 | 2.8 ± 0.3 |
Decay of parent and metabolites | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.999 | 77.2 ± 6.5 | 0.80 ± 0.17 | 9.9 ± 5.7 | 0.017 ± 0.027 |
C14E3 | 0.969 | 88.7 ± 5.2 | 1.02 ± 0.15 | 1.0 ± 3.9 | 0.007 ± 0.091 |
C14E6 | 0.980 | 91.5 ± 4.1 | 1.73 ± 0.19 | 3.5 ± 2.4 | 0.003 ± 0.011 |
C14E9 | 0.997 | 86.2 ± 2.7 | 2.75 ± 0.25 | 7.7 ± 1.9 | 0.023 ± 0.020 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.989 | 81.2 ± 5.0 | 1.04 ± 0.13 | 9.7 ± 4.6 | 0.026 ± 0.027 |
C14E6 | 0.991 | 89.4 ± 2.8 | 1.75 ± 0.15 | 6.7 ± 2.0 | 0.008 ± 0.012 |
C16E6 | 0.991 | 95.1 ± 3.2 | 1.19 ± 0.10 | 5.4 ± 2.4 | 0.004 ± 0.014 |
Mineralization to 14CO2 | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.990 | 52.3 ± 1.9 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 23.7 ± 4.4 | 0.013 ± 0.007 |
C14E3 | 0.992 | 53.8 ± 1.5 | 1.33 ± 0.10 | 20.7 ± 3.8 | 0.013 ± 0.006 |
C14E6 | 0.980 | 51.2 ± 1.1 | 1.32 ± 0.08 | 28.8 ± 16.3 | 0.005 ± 0.005 |
C14E9 | 0.997 | 47.4 ± 2.1 | 4.15 ± 0.67 | 19.9 ± 2.7 | 0.026 ± 0.018 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.988 | 40.9 ± 2.5 | 1.35 ± 0.19 | 26.1 ± 2.6 | 0.031 ± 0.009 |
C14E6 | 0.993 | 47.1 ± 1.0 | 1.47 ± 0.09 | 23.1 ± 4.7 | 0.010 ± 0.004 |
C16E6 | 0.994 | 43.0 ± 1.5 | 1.00 ± 0.08 | 16.3 ± 2.2 | 0.025 ± 0.011 |
Homolog | r2 | A (%)a | k1(h−1) | B (%)b | k2 (h−1) |
Decay of parent | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.998 | 71.2 ± 2.9 | 61.6 ± 5.1 | 28.1 ± 2.6 | 3.1 ± 0.4 |
C14E3 | 0.998 | 49.4 ± 4.4 | 70.6 ± 10.4 | 50.9 ± 4.1 | 5.7 ± 0.6 |
C14E6 | 0.999 | 63.3 ± 1.5 | 70.1 ± 3.2 | 36.6 ± 1.3 | 3.9 ± 0.2 |
C14E9 | 0.999 | 89.1 ± 0.9 | 78.4 ± 1.8 | 10.9 ± 0.8 | 2.7 ± 0.3 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.999 | 92.6 ± 0.4 | 69.2 ± 0.4 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.3 |
C14E6 | 0.999 | 83.2 ± 2.9 | 61.4 ± 3.1 | 16.7 ± 2.8 | 6.4 ± 1.3 |
C16E6 | 0.999 | 58.6 ± 5.6 | 17.9 ± 2.4 | 39.8 ± 5.7 | 2.8 ± 0.3 |
Decay of parent and metabolites | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.999 | 77.2 ± 6.5 | 0.80 ± 0.17 | 9.9 ± 5.7 | 0.017 ± 0.027 |
C14E3 | 0.969 | 88.7 ± 5.2 | 1.02 ± 0.15 | 1.0 ± 3.9 | 0.007 ± 0.091 |
C14E6 | 0.980 | 91.5 ± 4.1 | 1.73 ± 0.19 | 3.5 ± 2.4 | 0.003 ± 0.011 |
C14E9 | 0.997 | 86.2 ± 2.7 | 2.75 ± 0.25 | 7.7 ± 1.9 | 0.023 ± 0.020 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.989 | 81.2 ± 5.0 | 1.04 ± 0.13 | 9.7 ± 4.6 | 0.026 ± 0.027 |
C14E6 | 0.991 | 89.4 ± 2.8 | 1.75 ± 0.15 | 6.7 ± 2.0 | 0.008 ± 0.012 |
C16E6 | 0.991 | 95.1 ± 3.2 | 1.19 ± 0.10 | 5.4 ± 2.4 | 0.004 ± 0.014 |
Mineralization to 14CO2 | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.990 | 52.3 ± 1.9 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 23.7 ± 4.4 | 0.013 ± 0.007 |
C14E3 | 0.992 | 53.8 ± 1.5 | 1.33 ± 0.10 | 20.7 ± 3.8 | 0.013 ± 0.006 |
C14E6 | 0.980 | 51.2 ± 1.1 | 1.32 ± 0.08 | 28.8 ± 16.3 | 0.005 ± 0.005 |
C14E9 | 0.997 | 47.4 ± 2.1 | 4.15 ± 0.67 | 19.9 ± 2.7 | 0.026 ± 0.018 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.988 | 40.9 ± 2.5 | 1.35 ± 0.19 | 26.1 ± 2.6 | 0.031 ± 0.009 |
C14E6 | 0.993 | 47.1 ± 1.0 | 1.47 ± 0.09 | 23.1 ± 4.7 | 0.010 ± 0.004 |
C16E6 | 0.994 | 43.0 ± 1.5 | 1.00 ± 0.08 | 16.3 ± 2.2 | 0.025 ± 0.011 |
a Percent of total parent or parent and metabolites degraded or CO2 produced at first‐order rate (k1).
b Percent of total parent or parent and metabolites degraded or CO2 produced at first‐order rate (k2).
Table 4.
Parameters (estimate ± standard error) describing the biodegradation of linear alcohol ethoxylate homologs based upon two‐compartment first‐order decay or production models
Homolog | r2 | A (%)a | k1(h−1) | B (%)b | k2 (h−1) |
Decay of parent | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.998 | 71.2 ± 2.9 | 61.6 ± 5.1 | 28.1 ± 2.6 | 3.1 ± 0.4 |
C14E3 | 0.998 | 49.4 ± 4.4 | 70.6 ± 10.4 | 50.9 ± 4.1 | 5.7 ± 0.6 |
C14E6 | 0.999 | 63.3 ± 1.5 | 70.1 ± 3.2 | 36.6 ± 1.3 | 3.9 ± 0.2 |
C14E9 | 0.999 | 89.1 ± 0.9 | 78.4 ± 1.8 | 10.9 ± 0.8 | 2.7 ± 0.3 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.999 | 92.6 ± 0.4 | 69.2 ± 0.4 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.3 |
C14E6 | 0.999 | 83.2 ± 2.9 | 61.4 ± 3.1 | 16.7 ± 2.8 | 6.4 ± 1.3 |
C16E6 | 0.999 | 58.6 ± 5.6 | 17.9 ± 2.4 | 39.8 ± 5.7 | 2.8 ± 0.3 |
Decay of parent and metabolites | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.999 | 77.2 ± 6.5 | 0.80 ± 0.17 | 9.9 ± 5.7 | 0.017 ± 0.027 |
C14E3 | 0.969 | 88.7 ± 5.2 | 1.02 ± 0.15 | 1.0 ± 3.9 | 0.007 ± 0.091 |
C14E6 | 0.980 | 91.5 ± 4.1 | 1.73 ± 0.19 | 3.5 ± 2.4 | 0.003 ± 0.011 |
C14E9 | 0.997 | 86.2 ± 2.7 | 2.75 ± 0.25 | 7.7 ± 1.9 | 0.023 ± 0.020 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.989 | 81.2 ± 5.0 | 1.04 ± 0.13 | 9.7 ± 4.6 | 0.026 ± 0.027 |
C14E6 | 0.991 | 89.4 ± 2.8 | 1.75 ± 0.15 | 6.7 ± 2.0 | 0.008 ± 0.012 |
C16E6 | 0.991 | 95.1 ± 3.2 | 1.19 ± 0.10 | 5.4 ± 2.4 | 0.004 ± 0.014 |
Mineralization to 14CO2 | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.990 | 52.3 ± 1.9 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 23.7 ± 4.4 | 0.013 ± 0.007 |
C14E3 | 0.992 | 53.8 ± 1.5 | 1.33 ± 0.10 | 20.7 ± 3.8 | 0.013 ± 0.006 |
C14E6 | 0.980 | 51.2 ± 1.1 | 1.32 ± 0.08 | 28.8 ± 16.3 | 0.005 ± 0.005 |
C14E9 | 0.997 | 47.4 ± 2.1 | 4.15 ± 0.67 | 19.9 ± 2.7 | 0.026 ± 0.018 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.988 | 40.9 ± 2.5 | 1.35 ± 0.19 | 26.1 ± 2.6 | 0.031 ± 0.009 |
C14E6 | 0.993 | 47.1 ± 1.0 | 1.47 ± 0.09 | 23.1 ± 4.7 | 0.010 ± 0.004 |
C16E6 | 0.994 | 43.0 ± 1.5 | 1.00 ± 0.08 | 16.3 ± 2.2 | 0.025 ± 0.011 |
Homolog | r2 | A (%)a | k1(h−1) | B (%)b | k2 (h−1) |
Decay of parent | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.998 | 71.2 ± 2.9 | 61.6 ± 5.1 | 28.1 ± 2.6 | 3.1 ± 0.4 |
C14E3 | 0.998 | 49.4 ± 4.4 | 70.6 ± 10.4 | 50.9 ± 4.1 | 5.7 ± 0.6 |
C14E6 | 0.999 | 63.3 ± 1.5 | 70.1 ± 3.2 | 36.6 ± 1.3 | 3.9 ± 0.2 |
C14E9 | 0.999 | 89.1 ± 0.9 | 78.4 ± 1.8 | 10.9 ± 0.8 | 2.7 ± 0.3 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.999 | 92.6 ± 0.4 | 69.2 ± 0.4 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.3 |
C14E6 | 0.999 | 83.2 ± 2.9 | 61.4 ± 3.1 | 16.7 ± 2.8 | 6.4 ± 1.3 |
C16E6 | 0.999 | 58.6 ± 5.6 | 17.9 ± 2.4 | 39.8 ± 5.7 | 2.8 ± 0.3 |
Decay of parent and metabolites | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.999 | 77.2 ± 6.5 | 0.80 ± 0.17 | 9.9 ± 5.7 | 0.017 ± 0.027 |
C14E3 | 0.969 | 88.7 ± 5.2 | 1.02 ± 0.15 | 1.0 ± 3.9 | 0.007 ± 0.091 |
C14E6 | 0.980 | 91.5 ± 4.1 | 1.73 ± 0.19 | 3.5 ± 2.4 | 0.003 ± 0.011 |
C14E9 | 0.997 | 86.2 ± 2.7 | 2.75 ± 0.25 | 7.7 ± 1.9 | 0.023 ± 0.020 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.989 | 81.2 ± 5.0 | 1.04 ± 0.13 | 9.7 ± 4.6 | 0.026 ± 0.027 |
C14E6 | 0.991 | 89.4 ± 2.8 | 1.75 ± 0.15 | 6.7 ± 2.0 | 0.008 ± 0.012 |
C16E6 | 0.991 | 95.1 ± 3.2 | 1.19 ± 0.10 | 5.4 ± 2.4 | 0.004 ± 0.014 |
Mineralization to 14CO2 | |||||
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 0.990 | 52.3 ± 1.9 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 23.7 ± 4.4 | 0.013 ± 0.007 |
C14E3 | 0.992 | 53.8 ± 1.5 | 1.33 ± 0.10 | 20.7 ± 3.8 | 0.013 ± 0.006 |
C14E6 | 0.980 | 51.2 ± 1.1 | 1.32 ± 0.08 | 28.8 ± 16.3 | 0.005 ± 0.005 |
C14E9 | 0.997 | 47.4 ± 2.1 | 4.15 ± 0.67 | 19.9 ± 2.7 | 0.026 ± 0.018 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 0.988 | 40.9 ± 2.5 | 1.35 ± 0.19 | 26.1 ± 2.6 | 0.031 ± 0.009 |
C14E6 | 0.993 | 47.1 ± 1.0 | 1.47 ± 0.09 | 23.1 ± 4.7 | 0.010 ± 0.004 |
C16E6 | 0.994 | 43.0 ± 1.5 | 1.00 ± 0.08 | 16.3 ± 2.2 | 0.025 ± 0.011 |
a Percent of total parent or parent and metabolites degraded or CO2 produced at first‐order rate (k1).
b Percent of total parent or parent and metabolites degraded or CO2 produced at first‐order rate (k2).
Table 5.
Predicted molar percent of linear alcohol ethoxylate homologs and ethoxylate‐containing metabolites not removed during activated‐sludge treatment and escaping in the effluent based upon measured first‐order decay rates for parent and parent and metabolites, assuming a hydraulic residence time of 6 h, a solids retention time of 10 d, mixed liquor suspended solids of 2,500 mg/L, and a solids concentration of 20 mg/L in the effluent
Homolog | Kda (L/kg) | Free in solution | Parent sorbed to effluent solids | Total | % Total parent and metabolitesb |
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 1,690 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 17.2 |
C14E3 | 4,136 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 14.0 |
C14E6 | 2,736 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 8.8 |
C14E9 | 2,955 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 5.7 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 813 | 0.24 | <0.01 | 0.24 | 13.8 |
C14E6 | 2,736 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 8.7 |
C16E6 | 10,317 | 0.92 | 0.19 | 1.11 | 12.8 |
Homolog | Kda (L/kg) | Free in solution | Parent sorbed to effluent solids | Total | % Total parent and metabolitesb |
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 1,690 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 17.2 |
C14E3 | 4,136 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 14.0 |
C14E6 | 2,736 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 8.8 |
C14E9 | 2,955 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 5.7 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 813 | 0.24 | <0.01 | 0.24 | 13.8 |
C14E6 | 2,736 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 8.7 |
C16E6 | 10,317 | 0.92 | 0.19 | 1.11 | 12.8 |
a Reported by McAvoy [19].
b Assumes that Kd for metabolites equals zero and that removal occurs solely as a result of biodegradation.
Table 5.
Predicted molar percent of linear alcohol ethoxylate homologs and ethoxylate‐containing metabolites not removed during activated‐sludge treatment and escaping in the effluent based upon measured first‐order decay rates for parent and parent and metabolites, assuming a hydraulic residence time of 6 h, a solids retention time of 10 d, mixed liquor suspended solids of 2,500 mg/L, and a solids concentration of 20 mg/L in the effluent
Homolog | Kda (L/kg) | Free in solution | Parent sorbed to effluent solids | Total | % Total parent and metabolitesb |
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 1,690 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 17.2 |
C14E3 | 4,136 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 14.0 |
C14E6 | 2,736 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 8.8 |
C14E9 | 2,955 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 5.7 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 813 | 0.24 | <0.01 | 0.24 | 13.8 |
C14E6 | 2,736 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 8.7 |
C16E6 | 10,317 | 0.92 | 0.19 | 1.11 | 12.8 |
Homolog | Kda (L/kg) | Free in solution | Parent sorbed to effluent solids | Total | % Total parent and metabolitesb |
Phase 1 | |||||
C14E1 | 1,690 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 17.2 |
C14E3 | 4,136 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 14.0 |
C14E6 | 2,736 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 8.8 |
C14E9 | 2,955 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 5.7 |
Phase 2 | |||||
C12E6 | 813 | 0.24 | <0.01 | 0.24 | 13.8 |
C14E6 | 2,736 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 8.7 |
C16E6 | 10,317 | 0.92 | 0.19 | 1.11 | 12.8 |
a Reported by McAvoy [19].
b Assumes that Kd for metabolites equals zero and that removal occurs solely as a result of biodegradation.
The total load of parent and metabolites in effluent was likewise predicted by using the k1 describing the biodegradation of combined parent and metabolites. In this analysis, the metabolites were assumed to be highly soluble and not removed by sorption. Thus, the predicted removal is totally a function of the biodegradation rate (k1) and HRT. Because the radiolabel is localized in the ethoxylate moieties, this analysis is only relevant for metabolites containing ethoxylate moieties, such as ethylene glycol, PEGs, carboxylated PEGs, carboxyalkyl ethoxylates, and alkyl ethoxy carboxylates. Based upon this prediction, the molar percent of LAE transformed to metabolites escaping treatment ranged from 6 to 17%, depending upon homolog, with C14E1 having the highest predicted level of metabolites in effluent. However, it should be noted that the major metabolites from this homolog were less polar and would likely be removed by sorption, making this estimate high, because the Kd is assumed to be zero. Nevertheless, there is a strong inverse relationship between the predicted level of metabolites in the effluent and ethoxylate number.
Predicted removal based upon first‐order degradation rates and sorption coefficients can be compared to results from published CAS studies. Battersby et al. [12] reported that 88 to 102% and 83 to 97% of the dissolved carbon added in the form of C12–15E3 and C12–15E7, respectively, was removed in a CAS system operated with a 6‐h HRT. Szymanski et al. [13] measured the level of long‐chain and short‐chain PEG in effluent from a CAS system fed C12E10 operated with an HRT of 3.5 h and concluded that these measured levels equaled 21% of that theoretically formed from central fission. When using the rates from the current study, the level of metabolite predicted to be in effluent when assuming an HRT of 3.5 h is 23% for C12E6. In general, total removal of parent and metabolites is difficult to assess from a CAS system unless radiolabeled materials are used because of the complexity of the resulting metabolites and the difficulty in establishing a mass balance. The best study for making such a comparison is that of Steber and Wierich [10], who reported that approximately 24% of the radioactivity from a 14C‐(ethoxylate) C18E7 homolog dosed to a CAS system operated with a 3‐h HRT was present in the effluent. Sixteen percent of the radioactivity was in the form of neutral metabolites, presumably PEGs, and 8% was in the form of acidic metabolites, carboxyalkyl ethoxylates [17]. For comparison, when using the data from the current study and assuming an HRT of 3 h, the level of metabolites in effluent predicted for C16E6 would be 22%.
In conclusion, this study shows that a range of homologs of alcohol ethoxylate undergo rapid primary and ultimate biodegradation in activated sludge. However, the mechanism and the rates for this biodegradation vary as a function of ethoxylate number and alkyl chain length. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that the rates measured in an activated‐sludge die‐away test can be used with a reasonably high level of confidence to predict the level of parent and metabolites escaping wastewater treatment.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Kay Marks (Roy F. Weston) for her assistance in conducting this research and for her many years of dedicated service to Procter and Gamble in the field of environmental fate research and testing.
REFERENCES
1
Modler R Gubler R Kishi A
2002
. Surfactant, household detergents and their raw materials. In
Chemical Economics Handbook
.
SRI International Consulting
,
Menlo Park, CA, USA
, pp
83.8000A
–
583.80003K
.
2
Talmage SS
1994
.
Environmental and Human Safety of Major Surfactants: Alcohol Ethoxylates and Alkylphenol Ethoxylates
.
Lewis
,
Boca Raton, FL, USA
.
3
Swisher RD
1987
.
Surfactant Biodegradation
.
Marcel Dekker
,
New York, NY, USA
.
4
Kravetz L
1990
.
Biodegradation pathways of nonionic ethoxylates.
In Glass JE Swift G
Agricultural and Synthetic Polymers Biodegradability and Utilization
. Symposium Series 433.
American Chemical Society
,
Washington, DC
, pp
96
–
109
.
5
Marcomini A Zanette M Pojana G Carrer C Suter M
1999
.
Behavior of aliphatic alcohol polyethoxylates and their metabolites under standardized aerobic biodegradation conditions
.
Environ Toxicol Chem
19
:
549
–
554
.
6
vanGinkel CG
1996
.
Complete degradation of xenobiotic surfactants by consortia of aerobic microorganisms
.
Biodegradation
7
:
151
–
164
.
7
Larson RJ Games LM
1981
.
Biodegradation of linear alcohol ethoxylates in natural waters
.
Environ Sci Technol
15
:
1488
–
1493
.
8
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
1996
.
Simulation test—303A aerobic sewage treatment—Coupled units test
.
OECD
,
Paris, France
.
9
International Organization for Standardization
1995
.
Water quality—Evaluation of the elimination and biodegrability of organic compound in aqueous medium—Activated sludge simulation test
. ISO 11733.
ISO
,
Geneva, Switzerland
.
10
Steber J Wierich P
1983
.
The environmental fate of detergent range fatty alcohol ethoxylates—Biodegradation studies with a 14C labeled model surfactant
.
Tenside Detergent
20
:
183
–
187
.
11
Kravetz L Chung H Guin KF Shebs WT Smith LS
1984
.
Primary and ultimate biodegradation of an alcohol ethoxylate and a nonylphenol ethoxylate under average winter conditions in the United States
.
Tenside Detergent
21
:
1
–
6
.
12
Battersby NS Sherren AJ Bumpus RN Eagle R Molade IK
2001
.
The fate of linear alcohol ethoxylates during activated sludge sewage treatment
.
Chemosphere
45
:
109
–
121
.
13
Szymanski A Wyrwas B Swit Z Jaroszynski T Lukaszewski Z
2000
.
Biodegradation of fatty alcohol ethoxylates in the continuous flow activated sludge test
.
Water Res
34
:
4101
–
4109
.
14
Federle TW Itrich NR
1997
.
Comprehensive approach for assessing the kinetics of primary and ultimate biodegradation of chemicals in activated sludge: Application to linear alkylbenzene sulfonate
.
Environ Sci Technol
31
:
1178
–
1184
.
15
Patterson SJ Scott CC Tucker KB
1970
.
Nonionic detergent degradation: Initial mechanism of the degradation
.
J Am Oil Chem Soc
47
:
37
–
41
.
16
Tidswell EC Russell NJ White GF
1996
.
Ether‐bond scission in the biodegradation of alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactants by Pseudomonas sp. strain SC25A
.
Microbiology
142
:
1123
–
1131
.
17
Steber J Wierich P
1983
.
Metabolites and biodegradation pathways of fatty alcohol ethoxylates in microbial biocenoses of sewage treatment plants
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
49
:
530
–
537
.
18
Birch RR
1984
.
Biodegradation of nonionic surfactants
.
J Am Oil Chem Soc
1
:
340
–
343
.
19
McAvoy DC Kerr KM
2001
.
Association of alcohol ethoxylates with a dissolved humic substance.
In Clapp CE Hayes MH Senesi N Bloom PR Jardine PM
Humic Substances and Chemical Contaminants
.
Soil Science Society of America
,
Madison, WI
, pp
177
–
186
.
20
Namkung E Rittman BE
1987
.
Estimating volatile organic compound emissions from publicly owned treatment works
.
J Water Pollut Control Fed
59
:
670
–
678
.
21
Struijs JS van de Ment D
1991
.
A spreadsheet‐based box model to predict the fate of xenobiotics in a municipal wastewater treatment plant
.
Water Res
25
:
891
–
900
.
22
Tchobanoglous G Burton FL
1991
.
Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse
.
McGraw‐Hill
,
New York, NY, USA
.
23
Kravetz L Chung L Guin KF Shebs WT Smith LS
1982
. Ultimate biodegradation of an alcohol ethoxylate and nonylphenol ethoxylate.Household Personal Prod Ind March:
46
–
52
; April: 62–70.
24
Gledhill WE Huddleston RL Kravetz L Nielsen AM Sedlak RI Vashon RD
1989
.
Treatability of surfactants at a wastewater treatment plant
.
Tenside Surfactant Detergent
26
:
276
–
281
.
25
McAvoy DC Dyer SD Fendinger NJ Eckhoff WS Lawrence DL Begley WM
1998
.
Removal of alcohol ethoxylate, alcohol ethoxylate sulfates, and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in wastewater treatment
.
Environ Toxicol Chem
17
:
1705
–
1711
.
26
Matthijs E Holt MS Kiewiet A Rijs GB
1999
.
Environmental monitoring for linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, alcohol ethoxylates, alcohol ethoxy sulfate, alcohol sulfate, and soap
.
Environ Toxicol Chem
18
:
2634
–
2644
.
Copyright © 2004 SETAC
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)