link.springer.com

Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others - Memory & Cognition

  • ️Shafir, Eldar
  • ️Thu Jul 01 1993

References

  • Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty.Operations Research,30, 961–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyth-Marom, R., Austin, L., Fischhoff, B., Palmgren, C., & Jacobs-Quadrel, M. (in press). Perceived consequences of risky behaviors: Adults and adolescents.Developmental Psychology.

  • Brainard, R. W., Irby, T. S., Fitts, P. M., &Alluisi, E. (1962). Some variables influencing the rate of gain of information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,63, 105–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bursztajn, H., Chanowitz, B., Kaplan, E., Gutheil, T. G., Hamm, R. M., &Alexander, V. (1991). Medical and judicial perceptions of the risks associated with use of antipsychotic medication.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychology & the Law,19, 271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H., Donnell, M. L., &Kirk, D. B. (1978). An experimental study of risk preference in lotteries.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 497–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., &Parpal, M. (1989). Mental addition versus subtraction in counterfactual reasoning: On assessing the impact of personal actions and life events.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,57, 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firrs, P. M., &Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,46, 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, W. M. (1990). Judgments of relative importance in decision making: Global vs local interpretations of subjective weight.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,47, 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D. A., Sherman, S. J., &Baker, S. M. (1989). The influence of unique features and direction of comparison on preferences.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,25, 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, V. L., Neale, M. A., &Northcraft, G. B. (1987). Decision bias and personnel selection strategies.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,40, 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., &Snell, J. (1990). Predicting utility. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.),Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel Einhom (pp. 295–310). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., &Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—a model and taxonomy.Psychological Review,97, 253–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., &Slovic, P. (1973). Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in Las Vegas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G., &Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty.Economic Journal,92, 805–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1959).Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., &Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (pp. 249–410). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice.Bell Journal of Economics,9, 587–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marley, A. A. J. (1968). Some probabilistic models of simple choice and ranking.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,5, 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., &Tversky, A. (1988). On the framing of medical decisions. In D. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.),Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. 562–568). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., &Gentner, D. (1990). Similarity involving attributes and relations: Judgments of similarity and difference are not inverses.Psychological Science,1, 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (1989).Public choice II. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W. (1982). Contingent decision behavior.Psychological Bulletin,92, 382–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., &Reeve, T. G. (Eds.) (1990).Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schkade, D. A., &Johnson, E. J. (1989). Cognitive processes in preference reversals.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,44, 203–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (in press). Reason-based choice.Cognition.

  • Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects.Journal of Consumer Research,16, 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1990). Choice. In D. Osherson & E. Smith (Eds.),An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 3 (pp. 89–116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., &Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Response mode, framing, and information-processing effects in risk assessment. In R. Hogarth (Ed.),New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Question framing and response consistency (pp. 21–36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Griffin, D., &Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In R. Hogarth (Ed.),Insights in decision making: Theory and applications (pp. 5–27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., &Lichtenstein, S. (1983). Preference reversals: A broader perspective.American Economic Review,73, 596–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice.Psychological Review,79, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity.Psychological Review,84, 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., &Gati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization (pp. 79–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions.Journal of Business,59, 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model.Quarterly Journal of Economics,107, 1039–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., Sattath, S., &Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.Psychological Review,95, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., &Shafir, E. (1992). The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty.Psychological Science,3, 305–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., Slovic, P., &Kahneman, D. (1990). The causes of preference reversal.American Economic Review,80, 204–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K., Magat, W. A., &Huber, J. (1987). An investigation of the rationality of consumer valuations of multiple health risks.Rand Journal of Economics,18, 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J., &Morgenstern, O. (1947).Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1984).Engineering psychology and human performance. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references