nature.com

Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals - Nature

  • ️Lake, James A.
  • ️Thu May 29 1997

Abstract

The arthropods constitute the most diverse animal group, but, despite their rich fossil record and a century of study, their phylogenetic relationships remain unclear1. Taxa previously proposed to be sister groups to the arthropods include Annelida, Onychophora, Tardigrada and others, but hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships have been conflicting2,3. For example, onychophorans, like arthropods, moult periodically, have an arthropod arrangement of haemocoel1,4, and have been related to arthropods in morphological and mitochondrial DNA sequence analyses4,5. Like annelids, they possess segmental nephridia and muscles that are a combination of smooth and obliquely striated fibres6. Our phylogenetic analysis of 18S ribosomal DNA sequences indicates a close relationship between arthropods, nematodes and all other moulting phyla. The results suggest that ecdysis (moulting) arose once and support the idea of a new clade, Ecdysozoa, containing moulting animals: arthropods, tardigrades, onychophorans, nematodes, nematomorphs, kinor-hynchs and priapulids. No support is found for a clade of segmented animals, the Articulata, uniting annelids with arthropods. The hypothesis that nematodes are related to arthropods has important implications for developmental genetic studies using as model systems the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and the arthropod Drosophila melanogaster, which are generally held to be phylogenetically distant from each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boudreaux, H. B. Arthropod Phylogeny with Special Reference to Insects (Wiley, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raff, R. A., Marshall, C. R. & Turbeville, J. M. Using DNA sequences to unravel the Cambrian radiation of the animal phyla. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 351–375 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eernisse, D. J., Albert, J. S. & Anderson, F. E. Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: a phylogenetic analysis of spiralian metazoan morphology. Syst. Biol. 41, 305–330 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballard, J. W. et al. Evidence from 12S ribosomal RNA sequences that onychophorans are modified arthropods. Science 258, 1345–1348 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weygoldt, P. Arthropod relationships: the phylogenetic-systematic approach. Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 24, 19–35 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brusca, R. C. & Brusca, G. J. Invertebrates (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Halanych, K. M. et al. Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that the lophophorates are protostome animals. Science 267, 1641–1632 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lake, J. A. The order of sequence alignment can bias the selection of tree topology. Biol. Evol. 8, 378–385 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart, C.-B. The powers and pitfalls of parsimony. Nature 361, 603–607 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Winnepenninckx, B. et al. 18S rRNA data indicate that aschelminthes are polyphyletic in origin and consist of at least three distinct clades. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 1132–1137 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright, K. in Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates Vol. 4 (eds Harrison, F. W. & Ruppert, E. E.) 111–195 (Wiley-Liss, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lake, J. A. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: Paralinear distances. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 1455–1459 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lockhart, P. J., Steel, M. A., Hendy, M. D. & Penny, D. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 605–612 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Field, K. G. et al. Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science 239, 748–753 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hillis, D. M. & Bull, J. J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 182–192 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nielsen, C. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla (Oxford University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gee, H. Before the Backbone: Views on the Origin of the Vertebrates (Chapman & Hall, London, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Balavoine, G. The early emergence of plaryhelminths is contradicted by the agreement between 18S rRNA and Hox data C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Life Sci. 320, 83–94 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Valentine, J. W. Bilaterians of the Precambrian–Cambrian transition and the annelid–arthropod relationship. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 2272–2275 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. petterson, C. The Hierarchy of Life (eds Fernholm, B., Bremer, K. & Jornvall, H.) 471–488 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lake, J. A. Origin of the Metazoa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 763–766 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruppert, E. E. in Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates Vol. 4, (eds Harrison, R. W. & Ruppert, E. E.) 1–17 (Wiley-Liss, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: Phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39, 307–322 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boore, J. L., Collins, T. M., Stanton, S., Daehier, L. L. & Brown, W. M. Deducing the pattern of arthropod phylogeny from mitochondrial DNA rearrangements. Nature 376 163–165 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Conway Morris, S. The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa. Nature 361, 219–225 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lake, J. A. Calculating the probability of multitaxon evolutionary trees: Bootstrappers Gambit Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 9662–9666 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldman, N. Simple diagnostic statistical tests of models for DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 37, 650–661 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Felsenstein, J. & Churchill, G. A. A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 93–104 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wallace, R. L., Ricci, C. & Malone, G. A cladistic analysis of pseudoceolomate (aschelminth) morphology. Invert. Biol. 115, 104–112 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garey, J. R., Krotec, M., Nelson, D. R. & Brooks, J. Molecular analysis supports a Tardigrade–Arthropod association. Invert. Biol. 115, 79–88 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Molecular Biology Institute and MCD Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA

    Anna Marie A. Aguinaldo, Lawrence S. Linford, Maria C. Rivera & James A. Lake

  2. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701, USA

    James M. Turbeville

  3. Department of Biological Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15282

    James R. Garey

  4. Department of Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 33620, USA

    James R. Garey

  5. Department of Biology and Indiana Molecular Biology Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, USA

    Rudolf A. Raff

Authors

  1. Anna Marie A. Aguinaldo

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James M. Turbeville

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lawrence S. Linford

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria C. Rivera

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. James R. Garey

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rudolf A. Raff

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. James A. Lake

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Aguinaldo, A., Turbeville, J., Linford, L. et al. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387, 489–493 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/387489a0

Download citation

  • Received: 07 November 1996

  • Accepted: 03 April 1997

  • Issue Date: 29 May 1997

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387489a0