Dawn after the dark age - Nature
- ️McMahon, Richard
- ️Wed Sep 13 2006
- News & Views
- Published: 13 September 2006
Astronomy
Nature volume 443, pages 151–152 (2006)Cite this article
-
262 Accesses
-
1 Citations
-
3 Altmetric
The latest surveys provide evidence for one, maybe two, galaxies farther back in cosmic time than ever detected before. But does the fact that we don't see more mean these are the very first galaxies to be formed?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
References
Iye, M. et al. Nature 443, 186–188 (2006).
Bouwens, R. J. & Illingworth, G. D. Nature 443, 189–192 (2006).
Hu, E. M. & McMahon, R. G. Nature 382, 231–233 (1996).
Hu, E. M. et al. Astrophys. J. 568, L75–L79 (2002).
Horton, A. et al. Proc. SPIE 5492, 1022–1032 (2004).
Kneib, J. -P., Ellis, R. S., Santos, M. R. & Richard, J. Astrophys. J. 607, 697–703 (2004).
Eyles, L. et al. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 346, 443–454 (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 OHA, UK
Richard McMahon
Authors
- Richard McMahon
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McMahon, R. Dawn after the dark age. Nature 443, 151–152 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/443151a
Published: 13 September 2006
Issue Date: 14 September 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/443151a