en.unionpedia.org

Burns v. Hickenlooper, the Glossary

Burns v. Hickenlooper is a lawsuit filed on July 1, 2014, in federal district court in Colorado, challenging that state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples.^[1]

25 relations: Appeal, Bostic v. Schaefer, Certiorari, David M. Ebel, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Fundamental rights, Harris Hartz, Injunction, John Suthers, Kitchen v. Herbert, LGBT rights in Colorado, List of Latin legal terms, Oral argument, PACER (law), Raymond P. Moore, Recognition of same-sex unions in Colorado, Same-sex marriage in Colorado, Same-sex marriage in Oklahoma, Status conference, Stay of execution, Supreme Court of the United States, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, United States district court, United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Westlaw.
2014 in Colorado
Colorado law
John Hickenlooper
LGBT in Colorado
United States same-sex union case law

Appeal

In law, an appeal is the process in which cases are reviewed by a higher authority, where parties request a formal change to an official decision.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Appeal

Bostic v. Schaefer (formerly Bostic v. McDonnell and Bostic v. Rainey) is a lawsuit filed in federal court in July 2013 that challenged Virginia's refusal to sanction same-sex marriages. Burns v. Hickenlooper and Bostic v. Schaefer are 2014 in LGBT history, 2014 in United States case law and United States same-sex union case law.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Bostic v. Schaefer

Certiorari

In law, certiorari is a court process to seek judicial review of a decision of a lower court or government agency.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Certiorari

David M. Ebel

David Milton Ebel (born June 3, 1940) is a Senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and David M. Ebel

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Fundamental rights

Fundamental rights are a group of rights that have been recognized by a high degree of protection from encroachment.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Fundamental rights

Harris Hartz

Harris L Hartz (born January 20, 1947) is an American jurist and lawyer who serves as a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Harris Hartz

Injunction

An injunction is an equitable remedy in the form of a special court order that compels a party to do or refrain from specific acts.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Injunction

John Suthers

John William Suthers (born October 18, 1951) is an American attorney and politician who served as the mayor of Colorado Springs, Colorado, the Attorney General of Colorado, U.S. Attorney for Colorado, executive director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, and Fourth Judicial District Attorney.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and John Suthers

Kitchen v. Herbert

Kitchen v. Herbert, 961 F.Supp.2d 1181 (D. Utah 2013), affirmed, 755 F.3d 1193 (10th Cir. 2014); stay granted, 134 S.Ct. 893 (2014); petition for certiorari denied, No. Burns v. Hickenlooper and Kitchen v. Herbert are 2014 in United States case law and United States same-sex union case law.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Kitchen v. Herbert

LGBT rights in Colorado

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in the U.S. state of Colorado enjoy the same rights as non-LGBT people. Burns v. Hickenlooper and LGBT rights in Colorado are Colorado law and LGBT in Colorado.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and LGBT rights in Colorado

List of Latin legal terms

. DON'T DELETE ->. --> A number of Latin terms are used in legal terminology and legal maxims.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and List of Latin legal terms

Oral argument

Oral arguments are spoken presentations to a judge or appellate court by a lawyer (or parties when representing themselves) of the legal reasons why they should prevail.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Oral argument

PACER (law)

PACER (acronym for Public Access to Court Electronic Records) is an electronic public access service for United States federal court documents.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and PACER (law)

Raymond P. Moore

Raymond Paul Moore (born June 19, 1953) is a Senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Raymond P. Moore

Recognition of same-sex unions in Colorado

The U.S. state of Colorado has provided limited recognition of same-sex unions in the form of designated beneficiary agreements since July 1, 2009, and as civil unions since May 1, 2013. Burns v. Hickenlooper and recognition of same-sex unions in Colorado are LGBT in Colorado.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Recognition of same-sex unions in Colorado

Same-sex marriage in Colorado

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Colorado since October 7, 2014. Burns v. Hickenlooper and Same-sex marriage in Colorado are 2014 in Colorado, 2014 in LGBT history, Colorado law and LGBT in Colorado.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Same-sex marriage in Colorado

Same-sex marriage in Oklahoma

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Oklahoma since October 6, 2014, following the resolution of a lawsuit challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage. Burns v. Hickenlooper and same-sex marriage in Oklahoma are 2014 in LGBT history.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Same-sex marriage in Oklahoma

Status conference

A status conference (sometimes called an early conference) is a court-ordered meeting with a judge (or under some circumstances an authorized counsel) where a trial date (or other case deadlines) is decided.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Status conference

Stay of execution

A stay of execution (Law Latin: cesset executio, "let execution cease") is a court order to temporarily suspend the execution of a court judgment or other court order.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Stay of execution

Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Supreme Court of the United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (in case citations, 10th Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

United States district court

The United States district courts are the trial courts of the U.S. federal judiciary.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and United States district court

United States District Court for the District of Colorado

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado (in case citations, D. Colo. or D. Col.) is a federal court in the Tenth Circuit (except for patent claims and claims against the U.S. government under the Tucker Act, which are appealed to the Federal Circuit). Burns v. Hickenlooper and United States District Court for the District of Colorado are Colorado law.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and United States District Court for the District of Colorado

Westlaw

Westlaw is an online legal research service and proprietary database for lawyers and legal professionals available in over 60 countries.

See Burns v. Hickenlooper and Westlaw

References

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burns_v._Hickenlooper