en.unionpedia.org

Chimel v. California, the Glossary

Index Chimel v. California

Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant.[1]

Table of Contents

  1. 19 relations: Arizona v. Gant, Arrest, Attorney General of California, Certiorari, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Lawyers' Edition, LexisNexis, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 395, Pacific Reporter, Riley v. California, Ronald M. George, Samuel Alito, Search and seizure, Search warrant, Searches incident to a lawful arrest, Supreme Court of California, Supreme Court of the United States, Warrantless searches in the United States.

  2. 1969 in California
  3. 1969 in United States case law

Arizona v. Gant

Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires law-enforcement officers to demonstrate an actual and continuing threat to their safety posed by an arrestee, or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest from tampering by the arrestee, in order to justify a warrantless vehicular search incident to arrest conducted after the vehicle's recent occupants have been arrested and secured. Chimel v. California and Arizona v. Gant are United States Fourth Amendment case law.

See Chimel v. California and Arizona v. Gant

Arrest

An arrest is the act of apprehending and taking a person into custody (legal protection or control), usually because the person has been suspected of or observed committing a crime.

See Chimel v. California and Arrest

Attorney General of California

The attorney general of California is the state attorney general of the Government of California.

See Chimel v. California and Attorney General of California

Certiorari

In law, certiorari is a court process to seek judicial review of a decision of a lower court or government agency.

See Chimel v. California and Certiorari

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments.

See Chimel v. California and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. Chimel v. California and Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution are United States Fourth Amendment case law.

See Chimel v. California and Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Lawyers' Edition

The United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyers' Edition, or Lawyers' Edition (L. Ed. and L. Ed. 2d in case citations), is an unofficial reporter of Supreme Court of the United States opinions.

See Chimel v. California and Lawyers' Edition

LexisNexis

LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York.

See Chimel v. California and LexisNexis

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 395

This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 395 of the United States Reports. Chimel v. California and list of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 395 are 1969 in United States case law.

See Chimel v. California and List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 395

Pacific Reporter

The Pacific Reporter, Pacific Reporter Second, and Pacific Reporter Third are United States regional case law reporters.

See Chimel v. California and Pacific Reporter

Riley v. California

Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014),Riley v. California, (2014). Chimel v. California and Riley v. California are legal history of California and United States Fourth Amendment case law.

See Chimel v. California and Riley v. California

Ronald M. George

Ronald Marc George (born March 11, 1940) is an American jurist.

See Chimel v. California and Ronald M. George

Samuel Alito

Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. (born April 1, 1950) is an American jurist who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.

See Chimel v. California and Samuel Alito

Search and seizure

Search and seizure is a procedure used in many civil law and common law legal systems by which police or other authorities and their agents, who, suspecting that a crime has been committed, commence a search of a person's property and confiscate any relevant evidence found in connection to the crime.

See Chimel v. California and Search and seizure

Search warrant

A search warrant is a court order that a magistrate or judge issues to authorize law enforcement officers to conduct a search of a person, location, or vehicle for evidence of a crime and to confiscate any evidence they find.

See Chimel v. California and Search warrant

Searches incident to a lawful arrest

Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v. California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.

See Chimel v. California and Searches incident to a lawful arrest

Supreme Court of California

The Supreme Court of California is the highest and final court of appeals in the courts of the U.S. state of California.

See Chimel v. California and Supreme Court of California

Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States.

See Chimel v. California and Supreme Court of the United States

Warrantless searches in the United States

Warrantless searches are searches and seizures conducted without court-issued search warrants.

See Chimel v. California and Warrantless searches in the United States

See also

1969 in California

1969 in United States case law

References

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimel_v._California

Also known as 395 U.S. 752, Chimel v California.