Duren v. Missouri, the Glossary
Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the Sixth Amendment.[1]
Table of Contents
10 relations: Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Jury, Jury trial, Lawyers' Edition, LexisNexis, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Supreme Court of the United States, Taylor v. Louisiana, Women in United States juries.
- Legal history of Missouri
- United States Sixth Amendment jury case law
- United States equal protection and criminal procedure case law
- United States jury case law
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
An associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States is a justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, other than the chief justice of the United States.
See Duren v. Missouri and Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
Jury
A jury is a sworn body of people (jurors) convened to hear evidence, make findings of fact, and render an impartial verdict officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment.
See Duren v. Missouri and Jury
Jury trial
A jury trial, or trial by jury, is a legal proceeding in which a jury makes a decision or findings of fact.
See Duren v. Missouri and Jury trial
Lawyers' Edition
The United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyers' Edition, or Lawyers' Edition (L. Ed. and L. Ed. 2d in case citations), is an unofficial reporter of Supreme Court of the United States opinions.
See Duren v. Missouri and Lawyers' Edition
LexisNexis
LexisNexis is an American data analytics company headquartered in New York, New York.
See Duren v. Missouri and LexisNexis
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Joan Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Bader; March 15, 1933 – September 18, 2020) was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1993 until her death in 2020.
See Duren v. Missouri and Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The Sixth Amendment (Amendment VI) to the United States Constitution sets forth rights related to criminal prosecutions.
See Duren v. Missouri and Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States.
See Duren v. Missouri and Supreme Court of the United States
Taylor v. Louisiana
Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court which held that systematically excluding women from a venire, or jury pool, by requiring (only) them to actively register for jury duty violated the defendant's right to a representative venire. Duren v. Missouri and Taylor v. Louisiana are United States Sixth Amendment jury case law, United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court, United States equal protection and criminal procedure case law and United States jury case law.
See Duren v. Missouri and Taylor v. Louisiana
Women in United States juries
The representation of women on United States juries drastically increased during the last hundred years because of legislation and court rulings.
See Duren v. Missouri and Women in United States juries
See also
Legal history of Missouri
- Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
- Deck v. Missouri
- Dred Scott v. Sandford
- Drope v. Missouri
- Duren v. Missouri
- Geyer Act
- Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
- Hazelwood School District v. United States
- List of first minority male lawyers and judges in Missouri
- List of first women lawyers and judges in Missouri
- Minor v. Happersett
- Missouri Compromise
- Missouri Constitutional Convention of 1861–1863
- Missouri Executive Order 44
- Missouri Plan
- Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada
- Missouri v. Holland
- Missouri v. Iowa
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Missouri v. Seibert
- Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
United States Sixth Amendment jury case law
- Adams v. Texas
- Apodaca v. Oregon
- Ballew v. Georgia
- Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas
- Burch v. Louisiana
- Cheff v. Schnackenberg
- Duncan v. Louisiana
- Duren v. Missouri
- Ex parte Milligan
- Glasser v. United States
- Irvin v. Dowd
- J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
- Lockett v. Ohio
- Ludwig v. Massachusetts
- McDonnell v. United States
- McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
- Morgan v. Illinois
- Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado
- Reynolds v. United States
- Rita v. United States
- Rivera v. Illinois
- Sheppard v. Maxwell
- Skilling v. United States
- Spaziano v. Florida
- Swain v. Alabama
- Taylor v. Louisiana
- United States v. Jackson
- Wainwright v. Witt
- Williams v. Florida
- Williams v. Price
- Witherspoon v. Illinois
United States equal protection and criminal procedure case law
- Duren v. Missouri
- Hale v. Kentucky
- Hernandez v. Texas
- Norris v. Alabama
- Strauder v. West Virginia
- Taylor v. Louisiana
- Vasquez v. Hillery
United States jury case law
- Brown v. Kendall
- Brown v. New Jersey
- Dietz v. Bouldin
- Duren v. Missouri
- Ex parte Bigelow
- Ham v. South Carolina
- Holmes v. Walton
- Johnson v. Louisiana
- Maxwell v. Dow
- Ramos v. Louisiana
- Sparf v. United States
- State v. Strasburg
- Strauder v. West Virginia
- Taylor v. Louisiana
- Teague v. Lane
- United States v. Moylan
- United States v. Thomas (1997)
References
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duren_v._Missouri
Also known as 439 U.S. 357, 439 U.S. 459, 439 U.S. 461, 439 US 357, 439 US 459, 439 US 461, Duren v Missouri, Harlin v. Missouri, Lee v. Missouri.