Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd, the Glossary
Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd, 2 SCR 536 is a leading decision by the Supreme Court of Canada, which first acknowledged the existence of indirect discrimination through conduct that creates prejudicial effect.[1]
Table of Contents
5 relations: Central Okanagan School District No 23 v Renaud, Discrimination, Sears Canada, Seventh-day Adventist Church, Supreme Court of Canada.
- 1985 in Canadian case law
- Canadian civil rights case law
- Labour relations in Canada
- Religious discrimination
Central Okanagan School District No 23 v Renaud
Central Okanagan School District No 23 v Renaud, 2 SCR 970 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court found that an employer was under a duty to accommodate the religious beliefs of employees to the point of undue hardship. Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd and Central Okanagan School District No 23 v Renaud are History of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and Supreme Court of Canada cases.
Discrimination
Discrimination is the process of making unfair or prejudicial distinctions between people based on the groups, classes, or other categories to which they belong or are perceived to belong, such as race, gender, age, religion, physical attractiveness or sexual orientation.
See Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd and Discrimination
Sears Canada
Sears Canada Inc. was a publicly-traded Canadian company affiliated with the American-based Sears department store chain.
See Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd and Sears Canada
Seventh-day Adventist Church
The Seventh-day Adventist Church (SDA) is an Adventist Protestant Christian denomination which is distinguished by its observance of Saturday, the seventh day of the week in the Christian (Gregorian) and the Hebrew calendar, as the Sabbath, its emphasis on the imminent Second Coming (advent) of Jesus Christ, and its annihilationist soteriology.
See Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd and Seventh-day Adventist Church
Supreme Court of Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC; Cour suprême du Canada, CSC) is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada.
See Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd and Supreme Court of Canada
See also
1985 in Canadian case law
- 1985 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada
- Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd
- Operation Dismantle v R
- R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd
- R v Canadian Dredge & Dock Co
- R v Sansregret
- R v Therens
- Reference Re BC Motor Vehicle Act
- Singh v Canada
- Valente v R
Canadian civil rights case law
- Bliss v Canada (AG)
- British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v British Columbia Government Service Employees' Union
- British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) v British Columbia (Council of Human Rights)
- Brooks v Canada Safeway Ltd
- Canada (AG) v Lavell
- Christie v York
- Cunningham v Homma
- Duke v R
- Edwards v Canada (AG)
- Genetic Non-Discrimination Act
- Janzen v Platy Enterprises Ltd
- Lulu Anderson v The Brown Investment Company
- McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
- Noble v Alley
- Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Etobicoke (Borough of)
- Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd
- Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v Boisbriand (City of)
- Quong Wing v R
- R v Drybones
- Reference Re Persons of Japanese Race
- Robichaud v Canada (Treasury Board)
- Roncarelli v Duplessis
- Seneca College v Bhadauria
- Union Colliery Co of British Columbia v Bryden
Labour relations in Canada
- Blencoe v British Columbia (Human Rights Commission)
- British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v British Columbia Government Service Employees' Union
- British Columbia Government Employees' Union v British Columbia (AG)
- Canada Industrial Relations Board
- Canada Labour Code
- Canadian Human Rights Act
- Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 963 v New Brunswick Liquor Corp
- Central Alberta Dairy Pool v Alberta (Human Rights Commission)
- Collapse of the Canadian Women's Hockey League
- Cuddy Chicks Ltd v Ontario (Labour Relations Board)
- Douglas/Kwantlen Faculty Assn v Douglas College
- Dunmore v Ontario (AG)
- Egan v Canada
- Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board
- Harrison v Carswell
- Hodge v Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development)
- Janzen v Platy Enterprises Ltd
- Lavigne v Ontario Public Service Employees Union
- Lovelace v Ontario
- McKinney v University of Guelph
- Microsoft and unions
- Minimum wage in Canada
- Minister of Citizens' Services
- Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Official Languages
- Minister of Employment, Workforce, and Labour
- Minister of Families, Children and Social Development
- Minister of Labour (Canada)
- Mounted Police Association of Ontario v Canada
- Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v Newfoundland and Labrador Assn of Public and Private Employees
- Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Etobicoke (Borough of)
- Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd
- Ontario Hydro v Ontario (Labour Relations Board)
- Public Service Grievance Board
- R v Advance Cutting & Coring Ltd
- Rand formula
- Reference Re Public Service Employee Relations Act (Alta)
- Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 580 v Dolphin Delivery Ltd
- Slaight Communications Inc v Davidson
- Sobeys Stores Ltd v Yeomans
- Trade unions in Canada
- Union des Employes de Service, Local 298 v Bibeault
- United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 1518 v KMart Canada Ltd
Religious discrimination
- Anti-Amish sentiment
- Anti-cult movement
- Anti-religious sentiment
- Antisemitism
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal
- Azmi v Kirklees Metropolitan BC
- Bulgarian National Alliance
- Christian privilege
- Desecration
- Dhimmi
- Dhimmitude
- Discrimination against atheists
- Discrimination against modern pagans
- Equality Directive 2000
- False god
- Gozinesh
- Guidance Patrol
- Islamic religious police
- Islamophobia
- Kosher tax
- Mahsa Amini protests
- Muslim privilege
- Numerus clausus
- Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd
- Religious discrimination
- Religious intolerance
- Religious segregation
- Revised Joint Ministerial Decrees on Construction of Houses of Worship
- Roncarelli v Duplessis
- Shinbutsu bunri
- State religion
- Zunnar
References
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_(Human_Rights_Commission)_v_Simpsons-Sears_Ltd
Also known as O'Malley v. Simpson-Sears, Ontario Human Rights Commission and O'Malley v. Simpsons-Sears Ltd..