en.unionpedia.org

Parker immunity doctrine, the Glossary

The Parker immunity doctrine is an exemption from liability for engaging in antitrust violations.^[1]

12 relations: A.D. Bedell Wholesale Co., Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc., California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., Competition law, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, Legal liability, Noerr–Pennington doctrine, North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC, Parker v. Brown, Rice v. Norman Williams Co., Supreme Court of the United States, Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement.
State sovereign immunity in the United States
United States antitrust law

A.D. Bedell Wholesale Co., Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.

A.D. Bedell Wholesale Co., Inc.

See Parker immunity doctrine and A.D. Bedell Wholesale Co., Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.

California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.

California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn.

See Parker immunity doctrine and California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.

Competition law

Competition law is the field of law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies.

See Parker immunity doctrine and Competition law

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments.

See Parker immunity doctrine and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar

Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773 (1975), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision.

See Parker immunity doctrine and Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar

Legal liability

In law, liable means "responsible or answerable in law; legally obligated".

See Parker immunity doctrine and Legal liability

Under the Noerr–Pennington doctrine, private entities are immune from liability under the antitrust laws for attempts to influence the passage or enforcement of laws, even if the laws they advocate for would have anticompetitive effects. Parker immunity doctrine and Noerr–Pennington doctrine are United States antitrust law.

See Parker immunity doctrine and Noerr–Pennington doctrine

North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission, 574 U.S. 494 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of immunity from US antitrust law.

See Parker immunity doctrine and North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

Parker v. Brown

Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of United States antitrust law.

See Parker immunity doctrine and Parker v. Brown

Rice v. Norman Williams Co.

Rice v. Norman Williams Co., 458 U.S. 654 (1982), was a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court involving the preemption of state law by the Sherman Act.

See Parker immunity doctrine and Rice v. Norman Williams Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States.

See Parker immunity doctrine and Supreme Court of the United States

Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement

The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) was entered on November 23, 1998, originally between the four largest United States tobacco companies (Philip Morris Inc., R. J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard – the "original participating manufacturers", referred to as the "Majors") and the attorneys general of 46 states.

See Parker immunity doctrine and Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement

References

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_immunity_doctrine

Also known as State action immunity doctrine.