RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG), the Glossary
RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG), 3 S.C.R. 199 is a leading Canadian constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada what upheld the federal ''Tobacco Products Control Act'' but struck out the provisions that prevented tobacco advertising and unattributed health warnings.[1]
Table of Contents
11 relations: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Imperial Brands, List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court), Nicotine marketing, Peace, order, and good government, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867, Supreme Court of Canada, Tobacco and Vaping Products Act, Ultra vires.
- 1995 in Canadian case law
- Imperial Brands
- Medical lawsuits
- R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
- Smoking in Canada
- Tobacco case law
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charte canadienne des droits et libertés), often simply referred to as the Charter in Canada, is a bill of rights entrenched in the Constitution of Canada, forming the first part of the Constitution Act, 1982.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Imperial Brands
Imperial Brands plc (formerly Imperial Tobacco Group plc) is a British multinational tobacco company headquartered in London and Bristol, England.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and Imperial Brands
List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court)
This is a chronological list of notable cases decided by the Supreme Court of Canada from appointment of Antonio Lamer as Chief Justice of Canada to his retirement.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court)
Nicotine marketing
Nicotine marketing is the marketing of nicotine-containing products or use.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and Nicotine marketing
Peace, order, and good government
In many Commonwealth jurisdictions, the phrase "peace, order, and good government" (POGG) is an expression used in law to express the legitimate objects of legislative powers conferred by statute.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and Peace, order, and good government
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
The R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJR) is an American tobacco manufacturing company based in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and headquartered at the RJR Plaza Building.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") is the section of the Constitution of Canada that lists what the Charter calls "fundamental freedoms" theoretically applying to everyone in Canada, regardless of whether they are a Canadian citizen, or an individual or corporation.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867
Section 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867, also known as the criminal law power, grants the Parliament of Canada the authority to legislate on.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and Section 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867
Supreme Court of Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC; Cour suprême du Canada, CSC) is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and Supreme Court of Canada
Tobacco and Vaping Products Act
The Tobacco and Vaping Products Act (Loi sur le tabac et les produits de vapotage) is a Canadian law to regulate the production, marketing and sale of tobacco and vaping products.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and Tobacco and Vaping Products Act
Ultra vires
Ultra vires ('beyond the powers') is a Latin phrase used in law to describe an act that requires legal authority but is done without it.
See RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG) and Ultra vires
See also
1995 in Canadian case law
- 1995 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada
- Canadian Broadcasting Corp v Canada (Labour Relations Board)
- Egan v Canada
- Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto
- Miron v Trudel
- R (Canada) v Adams
- R v Burlingham
- R v Hibbert
- R v Jorgensen
- R v O'Connor
- R v Park
- R v U (FJ)
- RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG)
- Stewart v Pettie
- Thibaudeau v Canada
- Weber v Ontario Hydro
Imperial Brands
- Altadis
- Habanos S.A.
- ITG Brands
- Imperial Brands
- Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd
- Imperial Group plc v Philip Morris Ltd
- Imperial Tobacco Company Building
- New Smoking Material
- RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG)
- Reemtsma
- Salmon & Gluckstein
- Skruf Snus
- Stephen Mitchell & Son
- Tabacalera
- Tony Garrett
- W.D. & H.O. Wills
- William Churchman
- Wills baronets
Medical lawsuits
- Arseculeratne v. Priyani Soysa
- Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital
- Canterbury v. Spence
- Chaoulli v Quebec (AG)
- Charlie Gard case
- Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
- Doe v. Bolton
- Estelle v. Gamble
- Ferguson v. City of Charleston
- Gonzales v. Carhart
- Hadiza Bawa-Garba case
- Kay's Tutor v Ayrshire & Arran Health Board
- Landeros v. Flood
- Maryland v. King
- McFall v. Shimp
- Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
- Nekrep Case
- Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank
- Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons v. California Medical Ass'n
- R v Blaue
- RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG)
- Reibl v Hughes
- Roe v. Wade
- Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital
- Schmerber v. California
- Sudiksha Thirumalesh case
- Tetracycline litigation
- Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California
- United States v. Texas (2021)
- Van Wyk v Lewis
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
- Alan Landers
- American Snuff Company
- Arca Foundation
- Barbarians at the Gate
- Barbarians at the Gate (film)
- Camel Caravan
- Camel News Caravan
- Camel Trophy
- F. Ross Johnson
- IMSA GT Championship
- Joe Camel
- John Wesley Hanes I
- Karl von der Heyden
- Macdonald Tobacco
- Marshall McGearty Lounge
- NASCAR Winston Cup Series era
- Project SCUM
- R. J. Reynolds
- R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
- R. J. Reynolds Vapor Company
- RJR Nabisco
- RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community
- RJR Plaza Building
- RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG)
- Ralph Seagraves
- Reynolds American
- Reynolds Building
- Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company
- Viceroy Cup
- William Neal Reynolds
- Winston tastes good like a cigarette should
Smoking in Canada
- Action on Smoking and Health
- Airspace Action on Smoking and Health
- Barb Tarbox
- British Columbia v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd
- Canadian Council for Tobacco Control
- Ceremonial pipe
- Heather Crowe (activist)
- National Non-Smoking Week
- Non-Smokers' Rights Association
- RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG)
- Smoking in Canada
- Tobacco Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act
Tobacco case law
- British Columbia v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd
- Dryden v Greater Glasgow Health Board
- Ha v New South Wales
- Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd
- Imperial Group plc v Philip Morris Ltd
- Philip Morris v. Uruguay
- RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG)
References
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RJR-MacDonald_Inc_v_Canada_(AG)
Also known as RJR - MacDonald Inc. v. Canada, RJR - MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), RJR - MacDonald v. Canada, RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General).