en.unionpedia.org

R v Hibbert, the Glossary

Index R v Hibbert

R v Hibbert, 2 SCR 973, is a Supreme Court of Canada decision on aiding and abetting and the defence of duress in criminal law.[1]

Table of Contents

  1. 7 relations: Aiding and abetting, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Criminal Code (Canada), Criminal law, Duress in English law, Mens rea, Supreme Court of Canada.

  2. 1995 in Canadian case law

Aiding and abetting

Aiding and abetting is a legal doctrine related to the guilt of someone who aids or abets (encourages, incites) another person in the commission of a crime (or in another's suicide).

See R v Hibbert and Aiding and abetting

Court of Appeal for Ontario

The Court of Appeal for Ontario (frequently mistakenly referred to as the Ontario Court of Appeal) (ONCA is the abbreviation for its neutral citation) is the appellate court for the province of Ontario, Canada.

See R v Hibbert and Court of Appeal for Ontario

Criminal Code (Canada)

The Criminal Code (Code criminel) is a law that codifies most criminal offences and procedures in Canada.

See R v Hibbert and Criminal Code (Canada)

Criminal law

Criminal law is the body of law that relates to crime.

See R v Hibbert and Criminal law

Duress in English law

Duress in English law is a complete common law defence, operating in favour of those who commit crimes because they are forced or compelled to do so by the circumstances, or the threats of another.

See R v Hibbert and Duress in English law

Mens rea

In criminal law, mens rea (Law Latin for "guilty mind") is the mental state of a defendant who is accused of committing a crime.

See R v Hibbert and Mens rea

Supreme Court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC; Cour suprême du Canada, CSC) is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada.

See R v Hibbert and Supreme Court of Canada

See also

1995 in Canadian case law

References

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Hibbert

Also known as R. v. Hibbert.