R v Morales, the Glossary
R v Morales, 3 S.C.R. 711, is a case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada.[1]
Table of Contents
12 relations: Bail, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Criminal Code (Canada), Fundamental justice, List of Supreme Court of Canada cases, Narcotic Control Act, R v Oakes, Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Supreme Court of Canada.
- 1992 in Canadian case law
- Bail
- Canadian criminal procedure case law
Bail
Bail is a set of pre-trial restrictions that are imposed on a suspect to ensure that they will not hamper the judicial process.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charte canadienne des droits et libertés), often simply referred to as the Charter in Canada, is a bill of rights entrenched in the Constitution of Canada, forming the first part of the Constitution Act, 1982.
See R v Morales and Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Criminal Code (Canada)
The Criminal Code (Code criminel) is a law that codifies most criminal offences and procedures in Canada.
See R v Morales and Criminal Code (Canada)
Fundamental justice
In Canadian and New Zealand law, fundamental justice is the fairness underlying the administration of justice and its operation.
See R v Morales and Fundamental justice
List of Supreme Court of Canada cases
The Supreme Court of Canada is the court of last resort and final appeal in Canada. R v Morales and List of Supreme Court of Canada cases are Supreme Court of Canada cases.
See R v Morales and List of Supreme Court of Canada cases
Narcotic Control Act
The Narcotic Control Act (Loi sur les stupéfiants), passed in 1961, was one of Canada's national drug control statutes prior to its repeal by the 1996 Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. It implemented the provisions of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.
See R v Morales and Narcotic Control Act
R v Oakes
R v Oakes 1 SCR 103 is a Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the legal test for whether a government action infringing a right under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is justified. R v Morales and r v Oakes are Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law and Supreme Court of Canada cases.
Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the section that confirms that the rights listed in the Charter are guaranteed.
See R v Morales and Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the section of the Canadian Constitution that protects a person's legal rights in criminal and penal matters.
See R v Morales and Section 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a constitutional provision that protects an individual's autonomy and personal legal rights from actions of the government in Canada.
See R v Morales and Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, found under the "Legal rights" heading in the Charter, guarantees the right against arbitrary detainment and imprisonment.
See R v Morales and Section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Supreme Court of Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC; Cour suprême du Canada, CSC) is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada.
See R v Morales and Supreme Court of Canada
See also
1992 in Canadian case law
- 1992 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada
- Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v Chiarelli
- Canadian Council of Churches v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration)
- Canadian National Railway Co v Norsk Pacific Steamship Co
- Central Okanagan School District No 23 v Renaud
- London Drugs Ltd v Kuehne & Nagel International Ltd
- Moge v Moge
- Newfoundland Telephone Co v Newfoundland (Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities)
- Norberg v Wynrib
- Peel (Regional Municipality of) v Canada
- R v Butler
- R v Church of Scientology of Toronto
- R v DeSousa
- R v Généreux
- R v Mills
- R v Morales
- R v Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society
- R v Parks
- R v Smith (1992)
- R v Zundel
- Schachter v Canada
Bail
- Anticipatory bail
- Bail
- Bail Act 1898
- Bail Act 1978
- Bail Act 2013
- Bail bondsman
- Bail fund
- Police (Detention and Bail) Act 2011
- Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
- Policing and Crime Act 2017
- R v Morales
- Sixteenth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland
Canadian criminal procedure case law
- Azoulay v R
- Miazga v Kvello Estate
- Mills v R
- R v Askov
- R v Basi
- R v Brydges
- R v Cinous
- R v Finta
- R v Godoy
- R v Grant
- R v Hall
- R v Hape
- R v Harrison
- R v Hebert
- R v Henry
- R v Hydro-Québec
- R v Jordan (2016)
- R v Laba
- R v Lifchus
- R v M (MR)
- R v Manninen
- R v Morales
- R v Noble
- R v Owen
- R v Pan; R v Sawyer
- R v Prosper
- R v Rahey
- R v Rodgers
- R v S (RD)
- R v Sinclair
- R v Starr
- R v Stillman
- R v Stinchcombe
- R v Storrey
- R v Strachan
- R v Suberu
- R v Swain
- R v Therens
- R v Turcotte
- R v Turpin
- R v W (D)
- R v Whitfield
- R v Wigglesworth
- R v Wray
- R. v Broyles
- Vetrovec v R
- Wood v Schaeffer
References
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Morales
Also known as R. v. Morales.