R v Strachan, the Glossary
R v Strachan, 2 S.C.R. 980 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the exclusion of evidence under section 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms subsequent to a violation of a Charter right.[1]
Table of Contents
9 relations: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court), Narcotic Control Act, R v Collins (1987), Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Supreme Court of Canada.
- 1988 in Canadian case law
- Canadian criminal procedure case law
- Canadian evidence case law
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charte canadienne des droits et libertés), often simply referred to as the Charter in Canada, is a bill of rights entrenched in the Constitution of Canada, forming the first part of the Constitution Act, 1982.
See R v Strachan and Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court)
This is a chronological list of notable cases decided by the Supreme Court of Canada from Brian Dickson's appointment as Chief Justice on April 18, 1984, to his retirement on June 30, 1990.
See R v Strachan and List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court)
Narcotic Control Act
The Narcotic Control Act (Loi sur les stupéfiants), passed in 1961, was one of Canada's national drug control statutes prior to its repeal by the 1996 Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. It implemented the provisions of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. R v Strachan and Narcotic Control Act are Canadian law stubs.
See R v Strachan and Narcotic Control Act
R v Collins (1987)
R v Collins 1 S.C.R. 265 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on section 8 and was a leading case on section 24(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982 which allowed for the exclusion of evidence upon infringing the Charter. R v Strachan and r v Collins (1987) are Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law and Supreme Court of Canada cases.
See R v Strachan and R v Collins (1987)
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP; Gendarmerie royale du Canada; GRC) is the national police service of Canada.
See R v Strachan and Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms specifies rights upon arrest or detention, including the rights to consult a lawyer and the right to habeas corpus.
See R v Strachan and Section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides for remedies available to those whose Charter rights are shown to be violated.
See R v Strachan and Section 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects against unreasonable search and seizure.
See R v Strachan and Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Supreme Court of Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC; Cour suprême du Canada, CSC) is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada.
See R v Strachan and Supreme Court of Canada
See also
1988 in Canadian case law
- 1988 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada
- British Columbia Government Employees' Union v British Columbia (AG)
- Devine v Quebec (AG)
- Ford v Quebec (AG)
- R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd
- R v Dyment
- R v Mercure
- R v Morgentaler
- R v Stevens
- R v Strachan
- Union des Employes de Service, Local 298 v Bibeault
Canadian criminal procedure case law
- Azoulay v R
- Miazga v Kvello Estate
- Mills v R
- R v Askov
- R v Basi
- R v Brydges
- R v Cinous
- R v Finta
- R v Godoy
- R v Grant
- R v Hall
- R v Hape
- R v Harrison
- R v Hebert
- R v Henry
- R v Hydro-Québec
- R v Jordan (2016)
- R v Laba
- R v Lifchus
- R v M (MR)
- R v Manninen
- R v Morales
- R v Noble
- R v Owen
- R v Pan; R v Sawyer
- R v Prosper
- R v Rahey
- R v Rodgers
- R v S (RD)
- R v Sinclair
- R v Starr
- R v Stillman
- R v Stinchcombe
- R v Storrey
- R v Strachan
- R v Suberu
- R v Swain
- R v Therens
- R v Turcotte
- R v Turpin
- R v W (D)
- R v Whitfield
- R v Wigglesworth
- R v Wray
- R. v Broyles
- Vetrovec v R
- Wood v Schaeffer
Canadian evidence case law
- Cinar Corp v Robinson
- Descôteaux v Mierzwinski
- Graat v R
- R v B (KG)
- R v Béland
- R v Gruenke
- R v Handy
- R v Hebert
- R v Henry
- R v Khan
- R v Khelawon
- R v Laba
- R v Lavallee
- R v Lifchus
- R v M (MR)
- R v Manninen
- R v Marquard
- R v Mills
- R v Mohan
- R v Noble
- R v O'Connor
- R v Oickle
- R v Rodgers
- R v Seaboyer
- R v Smith (1992)
- R v Starr
- R v Stillman
- R v Stinchcombe
- R v Strachan
- R v Turcotte
- R v U (FJ)
- R v W (D)
- R v Wray
- R. v Broyles
- Solosky v R
- Vetrovec v R
References
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Strachan
Also known as R. v. Strachan.