Reibl v Hughes, the Glossary
Reibl v Hughes 2 S.C.R. 880 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on negligence, medical malpractice, informed consent, the duty to warn, and causation.[1]
Table of Contents
7 relations: Battery (crime), Court of Appeal for Ontario, Endarterectomy, Informed consent, Medical malpractice, Supreme Court of Canada, Tort.
- 1980 in Canadian case law
- Canadian tort case law
- Medical lawsuits
- Medical malpractice case law
Battery (crime)
Battery is a criminal offense involving unlawful physical contact, distinct from assault, which is the act of creating apprehension of such contact.
See Reibl v Hughes and Battery (crime)
Court of Appeal for Ontario
The Court of Appeal for Ontario (frequently mistakenly referred to as the Ontario Court of Appeal) (ONCA is the abbreviation for its neutral citation) is the appellate court for the province of Ontario, Canada.
See Reibl v Hughes and Court of Appeal for Ontario
Endarterectomy
Endarterectomy is a surgical procedure to remove the atheromatous plaque material, or blockage, in the lining of an artery constricted by the buildup of deposits.
See Reibl v Hughes and Endarterectomy
Informed consent
Informed consent is a principle in medical ethics, medical law and media studies, that a patient must have sufficient information and understanding before making decisions about their medical care.
See Reibl v Hughes and Informed consent
Medical malpractice
Medical malpractice is a legal cause of action that occurs when a medical or health care professional, through a negligent act or omission, deviates from standards in their profession, thereby causing injury or death to a patient.
See Reibl v Hughes and Medical malpractice
Supreme Court of Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC; Cour suprême du Canada, CSC) is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada.
See Reibl v Hughes and Supreme Court of Canada
Tort
A tort is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act.
See also
1980 in Canadian case law
- Pappajohn v R
- Pettkus v Becker
- Reibl v Hughes
Canadian tort case law
- AI Enterprises Ltd v Bram Enterprises Ltd
- Arnold v Teno
- Astley v Verdun
- BG Checo International Ltd v British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority
- Bazley v Curry
- Bettel v Yim
- Canadian National Railway Co v Norsk Pacific Steamship Co
- Central Trust Co v Rafuse
- Childs v Desormeaux
- Cooper v Hobart
- Deloitte & Touche v Livent Inc (Receiver of)
- Dobson (Litigation guardian of) v Dobson
- Doe v Bennett
- Freeman-Maloy v Marsden
- Hall v Hebert
- Honda Canada Inc v Keays
- Horsley v MacLaren
- Jordan House Hotel Ltd v Menow
- Kamloops (City of) v Nielsen
- Kuipers v Gordon Riley Transport
- London Drugs Ltd v Kuehne & Nagel International Ltd
- Miazga v Kvello Estate
- Norberg v Wynrib
- Priestman v Colangelo
- R v Saskatchewan Wheat Pool
- Reibl v Hughes
- Seneca College v Bhadauria
- Stewart v Pettie
- Wake-Walker v SS Colin W Ltd
- Wallace v United Grain Growers Ltd
Medical lawsuits
- Arseculeratne v. Priyani Soysa
- Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital
- Canterbury v. Spence
- Chaoulli v Quebec (AG)
- Charlie Gard case
- Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
- Doe v. Bolton
- Estelle v. Gamble
- Ferguson v. City of Charleston
- Gonzales v. Carhart
- Hadiza Bawa-Garba case
- Kay's Tutor v Ayrshire & Arran Health Board
- Landeros v. Flood
- Maryland v. King
- McFall v. Shimp
- Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
- Nekrep Case
- Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank
- Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons v. California Medical Ass'n
- R v Blaue
- RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG)
- Reibl v Hughes
- Roe v. Wade
- Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital
- Schmerber v. California
- Sudiksha Thirumalesh case
- Tetracycline litigation
- Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California
- United States v. Texas (2021)
- Van Wyk v Lewis
Medical malpractice case law
- Arseculeratne v. Priyani Soysa
- Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee
- Cahoon v. Cummings
- Canterbury v. Spence
- Death of Chong Yun Jing
- Estelle v. Gamble
- Fortunato v. Office of Stephen M. Silston, D.D.S.
- Hawkins v. McGee
- Kawaauhau v. Geiger
- Kay's Tutor v Ayrshire & Arran Health Board
- Landeros v. Flood
- Levy v. Louisiana
- Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
- Nekrep Case
- Nowatske v. Osterloh
- Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank
- Philp v Ryan
- Reibl v Hughes
- Roe v Minister of Health
- Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital
- Van Wyk v Lewis
- Ybarra v. Spangard
References
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reibl_v_Hughes
Also known as Reibel v. Hughes, Reibl v. Hughes.