Batson v. Kentucky & Strike for cause - Unionpedia, the concept map
Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.
Difference between Batson v. Kentucky and Strike for cause
Batson v. Kentucky vs. Strike for cause
Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling that a prosecutor's use of a peremptory challenge in a criminal case—the dismissal of jurors without stating a valid cause for doing so—may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on their race. Strike for cause (also referred to as challenge for cause or removal for cause) is a method of eliminating potential members from a jury panel in the United States.
Similarities between Batson v. Kentucky and Strike for cause
Batson v. Kentucky and Strike for cause have 4 things in common (in Unionpedia): Jury, Jury selection, Peremptory challenge, Voir dire.
The list above answers the following questions
- What Batson v. Kentucky and Strike for cause have in common
- What are the similarities between Batson v. Kentucky and Strike for cause
Batson v. Kentucky and Strike for cause Comparison
Batson v. Kentucky has 54 relations, while Strike for cause has 5. As they have in common 4, the Jaccard index is 6.78% = 4 / (54 + 5).
References
This article shows the relationship between Batson v. Kentucky and Strike for cause. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: