Chimel v. California & Samuel Alito - Unionpedia, the concept map
Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.
Difference between Chimel v. California and Samuel Alito
Chimel v. California vs. Samuel Alito
Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. (born April 1, 1950) is an American jurist who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Similarities between Chimel v. California and Samuel Alito
Chimel v. California and Samuel Alito have 2 things in common (in Unionpedia): Search warrant, Supreme Court of the United States.
The list above answers the following questions
- What Chimel v. California and Samuel Alito have in common
- What are the similarities between Chimel v. California and Samuel Alito
Chimel v. California and Samuel Alito Comparison
Chimel v. California has 19 relations, while Samuel Alito has 296. As they have in common 2, the Jaccard index is 0.63% = 2 / (19 + 296).
References
This article shows the relationship between Chimel v. California and Samuel Alito. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: