Disfranchisement & Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) - Unionpedia, the concept map
Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.
Difference between Disfranchisement and Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)
Disfranchisement vs. Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)
Disfranchisement, also disenfranchisement (which has become more common since 1982) or voter disqualification, is the restriction of suffrage (the right to vote) of a person or group of people, or a practice that has the effect of preventing someone from exercising the right to vote. Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), 3 SCR 519 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court held that prisoners have a right to vote under section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Similarities between Disfranchisement and Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)
Disfranchisement and Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) have 1 thing in common (in Unionpedia): Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The list above answers the following questions
- What Disfranchisement and Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) have in common
- What are the similarities between Disfranchisement and Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)
Disfranchisement and Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) Comparison
Disfranchisement has 209 relations, while Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) has 12. As they have in common 1, the Jaccard index is 0.45% = 1 / (209 + 12).
References
This article shows the relationship between Disfranchisement and Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer). To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: