en.unionpedia.org

False dilemma & Logical reasoning - Unionpedia, the concept map

Shortcuts: Differences, Similarities, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, References.

Difference between False dilemma and Logical reasoning

False dilemma vs. Logical reasoning

A false dilemma, also referred to as false dichotomy or false binary, is an informal fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. Logical reasoning is a mental activity that aims to arrive at a conclusion in a rigorous way.

Similarities between False dilemma and Logical reasoning

False dilemma and Logical reasoning have 12 things in common (in Unionpedia): Argument, Critical thinking, Deductive reasoning, Defeasible reasoning, Disjunctive syllogism, Formal fallacy, Informal fallacy, Law of excluded middle, Logic, Reason, Soundness, Straw man.

Argument

An argument is a series of sentences, statements, or propositions some of which are called premises and one is the conclusion.

Argument and False dilemma · Argument and Logical reasoning · See more »

Critical thinking

Critical thinking is the analysis of available facts, evidence, observations, and arguments in order to form a judgement by the application of rational, skeptical, and unbiased analyses and evaluation.

Critical thinking and False dilemma · Critical thinking and Logical reasoning · See more »

Deductive reasoning

Deductive reasoning is the process of drawing valid inferences.

Deductive reasoning and False dilemma · Deductive reasoning and Logical reasoning · See more »

Defeasible reasoning

In philosophy of logic, defeasible reasoning is a kind of provisional reasoning that is rationally compelling, though not deductively valid.

Defeasible reasoning and False dilemma · Defeasible reasoning and Logical reasoning · See more »

Disjunctive syllogism

In classical logic, disjunctive syllogism (historically known as modus tollendo ponens (MTP), Latin for "mode that affirms by denying") is a valid argument form which is a syllogism having a disjunctive statement for one of its premises.

Disjunctive syllogism and False dilemma · Disjunctive syllogism and Logical reasoning · See more »

Formal fallacy

In logic and philosophy, a formal fallacy, deductive fallacy, logical fallacy or non sequitur (it does not follow) is a pattern of reasoning rendered invalid by a flaw in its logical structure that can neatly be expressed in a standard logic system, for example propositional logic.

False dilemma and Formal fallacy · Formal fallacy and Logical reasoning · See more »

Informal fallacy

Informal fallacies are a type of incorrect argument in natural language.

False dilemma and Informal fallacy · Informal fallacy and Logical reasoning · See more »

Law of excluded middle

In logic, the law of excluded middle or the principle of excluded middle states that for every proposition, either this proposition or its negation is true.

False dilemma and Law of excluded middle · Law of excluded middle and Logical reasoning · See more »

Logic

Logic is the study of correct reasoning.

False dilemma and Logic · Logic and Logical reasoning · See more »

Reason

Reason is the capacity of applying logic consciously by drawing conclusions from new or existing information, with the aim of seeking the truth.

False dilemma and Reason · Logical reasoning and Reason · See more »

Soundness

In logic and deductive reasoning, an argument is sound if it is both valid in form and has no false premises.

False dilemma and Soundness · Logical reasoning and Soundness · See more »

Straw man

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.

False dilemma and Straw man · Logical reasoning and Straw man · See more »

The list above answers the following questions

  • What False dilemma and Logical reasoning have in common
  • What are the similarities between False dilemma and Logical reasoning

False dilemma and Logical reasoning Comparison

False dilemma has 63 relations, while Logical reasoning has 86. As they have in common 12, the Jaccard index is 8.05% = 12 / (63 + 86).

References

This article shows the relationship between False dilemma and Logical reasoning. To access each article from which the information was extracted, please visit: