User talk:Carabinieri - Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The file File:WilliamEvartsCrop.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to say thanks for taking such effort to review the article. It's great to have someone who both has an interest in doing so, and a related interest in topics to be able to look at in such detail, which only serves to make the article that much stronger. Kaiser matias (talk) 01:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- User:Kaiser matias, I'm happy to. I think when someone puts a lot of work into an article, as I'm sure you did with this one, and ask for a review, they deserve a very thorough look. I'll get back to you on the FAC later today.--Carabinieri (talk) 13:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, and thanks for your other input there, I'll be sure to check out what you suggested. Always nice to know things like that. Kaiser matias (talk) 15:51, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 |
| trade unions |
|---|
| ... you were recipient no. 2226 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
|
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Árpád Doppler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Árpád Doppler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
FiddleheadLady (talk) 19:50, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive |
|
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andreas Kleinlein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Kleinlein until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Grnrchst (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article Burkinabé Bolshevik Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There is no evidence for this having ever existed. If someone finds sources, then please put it in the talk page of this page and ping me. You can delete this after.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
I don't really want to delete this page, but I can't find any references for it. Easternsahara (talk) 16:19, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]